[外電] Knicks To Sign Tyson Chandler
看板Knicks作者knicks8888 (Step By Step)時間14年前 (2011/12/09 09:38)推噓29(29推 0噓 18→)留言47則, 17人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)
The Knicks are nearing completion on a deal with Tyson Chandler worth $58
million over four seasons.
After their efforts to trade for Chris Paul stalled, sources say the Knicks
intensified their efforts to sign Chandler.
In order to sign Chandler, the Knicks will need either amnesty or trade
Chauncey Billups.
The Warriors were previously in the market for Chandler, but they are all but
out of the running.
Marc Stein reports that the Mavericks are uninterested in taking back Billups
in a sign-and-trade for Chandler.
Update: Multiple sources confim to Newsday's Alan Hahn that Chandler will
indeed end up with the Knicks. Both Billups and Turiaf will be shed in order
to create room for Chandler.
據說Billups已經打包回到丹佛老家了
比起CP3
我是比較傾向禁區球員
畢竟在奪冠的經驗上
這幾年的Pistons、Spurs、Lakers、Celtics 和今年的Mavs都至少有一位
七呎上下的禁區球員
相對於控球後衛的水準
就比較多樣化了
總之
很期待新球季
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 124.11.18.104
推
12/09 09:39, , 1F
12/09 09:39, 1F
推
12/09 09:40, , 2F
12/09 09:40, 2F
推
12/09 09:43, , 3F
12/09 09:43, 3F
→
12/09 09:44, , 4F
12/09 09:44, 4F
推
12/09 09:47, , 5F
12/09 09:47, 5F
推
12/09 09:47, , 6F
12/09 09:47, 6F
→
12/09 09:47, , 7F
12/09 09:47, 7F
→
12/09 09:48, , 8F
12/09 09:48, 8F
→
12/09 09:48, , 9F
12/09 09:48, 9F
→
12/09 09:49, , 10F
12/09 09:49, 10F
推
12/09 10:09, , 11F
12/09 10:09, 11F
推
12/09 10:14, , 12F
12/09 10:14, 12F
推
12/09 10:15, , 13F
12/09 10:15, 13F
推
12/09 10:23, , 14F
12/09 10:23, 14F
推
12/09 10:33, , 15F
12/09 10:33, 15F
推
12/09 10:43, , 16F
12/09 10:43, 16F
→
12/09 10:44, , 17F
12/09 10:44, 17F
推
12/09 10:50, , 18F
12/09 10:50, 18F
推
12/09 10:52, , 19F
12/09 10:52, 19F
推
12/09 10:59, , 20F
12/09 10:59, 20F
→
12/09 11:00, , 21F
12/09 11:00, 21F
推
12/09 11:10, , 22F
12/09 11:10, 22F
→
12/09 11:11, , 23F
12/09 11:11, 23F
推
12/09 11:22, , 24F
12/09 11:22, 24F
推
12/09 11:50, , 25F
12/09 11:50, 25F
推
12/09 12:08, , 26F
12/09 12:08, 26F
→
12/09 12:10, , 27F
12/09 12:10, 27F
推
12/09 13:50, , 28F
12/09 13:50, 28F
推
12/09 14:43, , 29F
12/09 14:43, 29F
→
12/09 14:44, , 30F
12/09 14:44, 30F
→
12/09 14:47, , 31F
12/09 14:47, 31F
→
12/09 14:47, , 32F
12/09 14:47, 32F
→
12/09 14:50, , 33F
12/09 14:50, 33F
推
12/09 14:53, , 34F
12/09 14:53, 34F
推
12/09 15:52, , 35F
12/09 15:52, 35F
推
12/09 16:10, , 36F
12/09 16:10, 36F
→
12/09 16:10, , 37F
12/09 16:10, 37F
→
12/09 16:17, , 38F
12/09 16:17, 38F
推
12/09 16:21, , 39F
12/09 16:21, 39F
→
12/09 16:25, , 40F
12/09 16:25, 40F
推
12/09 16:27, , 41F
12/09 16:27, 41F
→
12/09 16:27, , 42F
12/09 16:27, 42F
推
12/09 20:27, , 43F
12/09 20:27, 43F
推
12/09 21:04, , 44F
12/09 21:04, 44F
推
12/09 21:05, , 45F
12/09 21:05, 45F
→
12/09 22:29, , 46F
12/09 22:29, 46F
推
12/09 23:37, , 47F
12/09 23:37, 47F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):