[乳摸] Kings considering Okafor
http://0rz.tw/kURwt
Kings considering Okafor
A source with knowledge of the situation says the Kings are discussing a
trade with New Orleans that would send Kenny Thomas to the Hornets and bring
center Emeka Okafor to Sacramento.
聽說想用KT換Okafor!
The deal would be ideal for the Hornets, as Thomas' expiring contract worth
$8.7 million is just the kind of contract that would trim their enormous
payroll. The question, of course, is whether the Kings see Okafor as a big
man solution worth the five years and approximately $62 million left on his
deal.
Player '09-10 '10-11 '11-12 '12-13 '13-14
Thomas $8.7M -- -- -- --
Okafor $10.8M $11.8M $12.8M $13.8M $14.8M
The 6-foot-10, 255-pound center who was the second pick of the 2004 draft out
of Connecticut has averaged nearly a double-double (13.9 points, 10.6
rebounds) in his six-season career. He spent his first four seasons in
Charlotte before being traded to New Orleans in late July for Tyson Chandler.
生涯平均13.9分10.6板
No deal is imminent and this is merely a discussion between the two sides at
this point. - Sam Amick
只是摸摸而已,還不用付錢
相關:
http://www.sactownroyalty.com/2009/11/14/1157344/the-prospect-of-emeka-okafor
上方網址簡略概要:
我們確定要向季後賽衝擊了嗎?是,找Okafor來不錯。否,這會變成很難搞的合約。
Petrie從自由市場拉回來的,好像沒多少好貨,最好的是Divac ,但也有overpaid。
所以讓KT約完走人是不是件好事呢?
Hawes 的定位問題,我們仍然希望Hawes 當我們未來的中鋒?還是一個有力的禁區替
補。
雖然Okafor剛被交易過,但以他的約長度和重度,若沒打好就是一個累贅,而且市場
上還有成績比他更出色的長人。
--
CP3:我前腳剛傷,國王後腳就來挖人
Hawes:Okafor來當我替補,嗯,可以接受啦!(自我感覺良好魂!)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 125.224.130.147
※ 編輯: santabrelai 來自: 125.224.130.147 (11/15 08:29)
推
11/15 09:09, , 1F
11/15 09:09, 1F
→
11/15 09:16, , 2F
11/15 09:16, 2F
推
11/15 09:16, , 3F
11/15 09:16, 3F
→
11/15 09:16, , 4F
11/15 09:16, 4F
→
11/15 09:17, , 5F
11/15 09:17, 5F
→
11/15 09:19, , 6F
11/15 09:19, 6F
推
11/15 09:39, , 7F
11/15 09:39, 7F
推
11/15 09:50, , 8F
11/15 09:50, 8F
推
11/15 09:58, , 9F
11/15 09:58, 9F
推
11/15 10:17, , 10F
11/15 10:17, 10F
→
11/15 10:19, , 11F
11/15 10:19, 11F
→
11/15 10:20, , 12F
11/15 10:20, 12F
推
11/15 10:25, , 13F
11/15 10:25, 13F
→
11/15 10:26, , 14F
11/15 10:26, 14F
→
11/15 10:26, , 15F
11/15 10:26, 15F
→
11/15 10:29, , 16F
11/15 10:29, 16F
推
11/15 10:42, , 17F
11/15 10:42, 17F
→
11/15 10:43, , 18F
11/15 10:43, 18F
推
11/15 10:46, , 19F
11/15 10:46, 19F
→
11/15 10:46, , 20F
11/15 10:46, 20F
→
11/15 10:47, , 21F
11/15 10:47, 21F
→
11/15 10:48, , 22F
11/15 10:48, 22F
推
11/15 10:54, , 23F
11/15 10:54, 23F
→
11/15 10:54, , 24F
11/15 10:54, 24F
推
11/15 10:55, , 25F
11/15 10:55, 25F
提供一些正反說法:
正方:
1. 這是KT能帶給國王最好的禮物,說實在空出來的薪資空間除了對老闆之外別無益處,
2010自由市場不是我們這種小地方球隊玩得起的,不如趁這段時間內用KT的約為我們取得
最大的利益。
2. 讓我們能夠一下子取得強力的D ,Okafor是一個聯盟中的優秀長人,生涯平均兩雙的
他能補足我們長期缺乏的東西,他也有不錯的跳投能力,可以和JT成為良好的組合。即使
他進攻時槽透了,我們的先發中鋒現在也差不多一樣。
3. Petrie的自由市場進貨能力的確不佳(也和沙加緬度本身條件有關),除了Divac 之
外,他沒搞定過多少好物,他對交易和選秀還是比較在行。
4. Spencer Hawes Sucks....
反方:
1. 曾經的傷勢、高度、薪水,這些都是Okafor不能讓人信服的原因,他的薪水很明顯有
overpaid,他的高度才只有六呎十,不是完整的中鋒料。
2. 他會是一個薪水殺手,將我們期待已久的薪資空間重新卡死,我們讓KT整整待了那麼
多年,不就是為了這次解放,這會讓我們失去面對自由市場的彈藥。
3. Spencer Hawes 仍有其待開發之處,他在Miller離開後就打出了一段不錯的成績,現
在Okafor加入又會將他丟回板凳上,而且可能會一待多年。
4. 這麼快就要被丟,難道其中有鬼?
5. 比他好的長人且可能被交易仍有其人,像是某Boo及現在看來難買的Amare
目前看到評論,多數持正方意見
→
11/15 11:02, , 26F
11/15 11:02, 26F
推
11/15 11:12, , 27F
11/15 11:12, 27F
推
11/15 12:46, , 28F
11/15 12:46, 28F
→
11/15 12:47, , 29F
11/15 12:47, 29F
推
11/15 12:51, , 30F
11/15 12:51, 30F
→
11/15 12:52, , 31F
11/15 12:52, 31F
→
11/15 12:52, , 32F
11/15 12:52, 32F
→
11/15 12:53, , 33F
11/15 12:53, 33F
→
11/15 12:54, , 34F
11/15 12:54, 34F
→
11/15 12:55, , 35F
11/15 12:55, 35F
→
11/15 12:56, , 36F
11/15 12:56, 36F
→
11/15 12:58, , 37F
11/15 12:58, 37F
→
11/15 12:58, , 38F
11/15 12:58, 38F
還有 47 則推文
還有 2 段內文
→
11/15 18:11, , 86F
11/15 18:11, 86F
→
11/15 18:12, , 87F
11/15 18:12, 87F
推
11/15 18:12, , 88F
11/15 18:12, 88F
→
11/15 18:14, , 89F
11/15 18:14, 89F
→
11/15 18:14, , 90F
11/15 18:14, 90F
→
11/15 18:15, , 91F
11/15 18:15, 91F
→
11/15 18:19, , 92F
11/15 18:19, 92F
→
11/15 18:20, , 93F
11/15 18:20, 93F
推
11/15 18:22, , 94F
11/15 18:22, 94F
→
11/15 18:23, , 95F
11/15 18:23, 95F
→
11/15 18:23, , 96F
11/15 18:23, 96F
→
11/15 18:25, , 97F
11/15 18:25, 97F
推
11/15 20:55, , 98F
11/15 20:55, 98F
→
11/15 20:59, , 99F
11/15 20:59, 99F
→
11/15 21:00, , 100F
11/15 21:00, 100F
→
11/15 21:01, , 101F
11/15 21:01, 101F
→
11/15 21:04, , 102F
11/15 21:04, 102F
推
11/15 23:44, , 103F
11/15 23:44, 103F
→
11/15 23:46, , 104F
11/15 23:46, 104F
推
11/15 23:58, , 105F
11/15 23:58, 105F
推
11/16 00:10, , 106F
11/16 00:10, 106F
→
11/16 00:11, , 107F
11/16 00:11, 107F
→
11/16 00:13, , 108F
11/16 00:13, 108F
推
11/16 00:14, , 109F
11/16 00:14, 109F
→
11/16 00:15, , 110F
11/16 00:15, 110F
推
11/16 00:16, , 111F
11/16 00:16, 111F
→
11/16 00:17, , 112F
11/16 00:17, 112F
→
11/16 00:18, , 113F
11/16 00:18, 113F
→
11/16 00:19, , 114F
11/16 00:19, 114F
推
11/16 00:19, , 115F
11/16 00:19, 115F
→
11/16 00:20, , 116F
11/16 00:20, 116F
→
11/16 00:20, , 117F
11/16 00:20, 117F
→
11/16 00:21, , 118F
11/16 00:21, 118F
→
11/16 00:21, , 119F
11/16 00:21, 119F
推
11/16 00:24, , 120F
11/16 00:24, 120F
推
11/16 00:24, , 121F
11/16 00:24, 121F
推
11/16 00:32, , 122F
11/16 00:32, 122F
→
11/16 00:32, , 123F
11/16 00:32, 123F
推
11/16 01:10, , 124F
11/16 01:10, 124F
→
11/16 01:11, , 125F
11/16 01:11, 125F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):