[問題] 機車行佔用人行道是要報環保局or警局?
此間機車行位在三民區莊敬國小對面,廢棄機車都放在紅線以及人行道上,小朋友放學後
經過這裡都要走到大馬路,實在很危險。
請問這樣是要投訴到環保局還是警察局?
題外話,此機車行旁邊還有掛上某立委的服務處,是因為這樣才一直沒事嗎?還是在高雄
這樣是正常的?
以上可按 刪除
不管你要問什麼,都別忘了附上『高雄點』
我是高雄人或我曾住在高雄不能當高雄點喔
高雄點定義請參閱板規
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.12.147.152
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Kaohsiung/M.1475412447.A.065.html
推
10/02 20:52, , 1F
10/02 20:52, 1F
了解,馬上檢舉
推
10/02 20:55, , 2F
10/02 20:55, 2F
蛤…有這麼嚴重嗎
※ 編輯: sharonick (101.12.147.152), 10/02/2016 20:58:59
※ 編輯: sharonick (101.12.147.152), 10/02/2016 20:59:19
推
10/02 21:05, , 3F
10/02 21:05, 3F
→
10/02 21:05, , 4F
10/02 21:05, 4F
推
10/02 21:07, , 5F
10/02 21:07, 5F
推
10/02 21:12, , 6F
10/02 21:12, 6F
推
10/02 21:12, , 7F
10/02 21:12, 7F
→
10/02 21:13, , 8F
10/02 21:13, 8F
推
10/02 21:13, , 9F
10/02 21:13, 9F
→
10/02 21:14, , 10F
10/02 21:14, 10F
→
10/02 21:14, , 11F
10/02 21:14, 11F
→
10/02 21:16, , 12F
10/02 21:16, 12F
→
10/02 21:16, , 13F
10/02 21:16, 13F
→
10/02 21:16, , 14F
10/02 21:16, 14F
→
10/02 21:18, , 15F
10/02 21:18, 15F
推
10/02 21:19, , 16F
10/02 21:19, 16F
推
10/02 21:30, , 17F
10/02 21:30, 17F
推
10/02 21:32, , 18F
10/02 21:32, 18F
→
10/02 21:32, , 19F
10/02 21:32, 19F
檢,都檢
※ 編輯: sharonick (101.12.147.152), 10/02/2016 21:40:59
→
10/02 21:44, , 20F
10/02 21:44, 20F
推
10/02 21:46, , 21F
10/02 21:46, 21F
推
10/02 21:47, , 22F
10/02 21:47, 22F
→
10/02 21:47, , 23F
10/02 21:47, 23F
推
10/02 21:49, , 24F
10/02 21:49, 24F
蛤,我這樣用googlemap不行嗎?
推
10/02 21:56, , 25F
10/02 21:56, 25F
→
10/02 21:56, , 26F
10/02 21:56, 26F
→
10/02 21:57, , 27F
10/02 21:57, 27F
推
10/02 21:59, , 28F
10/02 21:59, 28F
→
10/02 21:59, , 29F
10/02 21:59, 29F
推
10/02 22:14, , 30F
10/02 22:14, 30F
→
10/02 22:14, , 31F
10/02 22:14, 31F
火車站那裡就算了,但這家害很多國小生要走到馬路上去
推
10/02 22:14, , 32F
10/02 22:14, 32F
→
10/02 22:15, , 33F
10/02 22:15, 33F
※ 編輯: sharonick (101.12.147.152), 10/02/2016 22:31:33
※ 編輯: sharonick (101.12.147.152), 10/02/2016 22:32:03
→
10/02 23:08, , 34F
10/02 23:08, 34F
推
10/02 23:38, , 35F
10/02 23:38, 35F
→
10/03 00:06, , 36F
10/03 00:06, 36F
→
10/03 01:34, , 37F
10/03 01:34, 37F
→
10/03 01:34, , 38F
10/03 01:34, 38F
噓
10/03 07:08, , 39F
10/03 07:08, 39F
→
10/03 07:08, , 40F
10/03 07:08, 40F
推
10/03 08:53, , 41F
10/03 08:53, 41F
推
10/03 10:05, , 42F
10/03 10:05, 42F
推
10/03 10:19, , 43F
10/03 10:19, 43F
→
10/03 10:21, , 44F
10/03 10:21, 44F
→
10/03 10:22, , 45F
10/03 10:22, 45F
推
10/03 10:39, , 46F
10/03 10:39, 46F
→
10/03 10:41, , 47F
10/03 10:41, 47F
→
10/03 23:02, , 48F
10/03 23:02, 48F
推
10/04 04:53, , 49F
10/04 04:53, 49F
噓
10/04 20:03, , 50F
10/04 20:03, 50F
→
10/04 20:03, , 51F
10/04 20:03, 51F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):