Re: [閒聊] 單橫陣對砲迴避的影響
※ 引述《StellaNe (凍結的大地)》之銘言:
: 基本上是艦隊都市傳說的老話題了,多數的驗證傾向於沒有這回事
: 但是今天看到這一篇驗證:
: http://bs-arekore.at.webry.info/201504/article_7.html
: 樣本數看起來非常足夠
: 結論是單橫陣砲迴避比較高..............不過是在深海棲艦方
: 這樣驗證方法的好處是穩定,像是要驗證我方單橫迴避就要湊四隻去擺單橫
: 還無法控哪隻被打,且出高等船有等級不一影響,用1等還要湊四隻一樣的
: 去打對方只有固定的幾種船,只要不斷派一隻Lv1的去就好了
: 所以蒐集樣本很快
: 感想就是即使是我方單橫砲迴避也會上升,大多數老手提督還是不用選擇去用啊XD
: 還是老老實實用單縱陣先把對方打爆
: 3-2那種門神單縱也打不爆的就另外再說了
剛才看關於砲擊檢證的nico生放送時,剛好有討論這件事情,
http://bs-arekore.at.webry.info/201504/article_7.html
再驗證完深海後,五月同作者也驗證了我方單橫迴避,(下面追記部分)
結果單橫對上單縱的被彈率約下降5~7%左右
同時したらば 檢証串也有新的數據
http://jbbs.shitaraba.net/bbs/read.cgi/netgame/12394/1432666279
>145
測試方法是拿低等驅逐到3-5-1測試
単縦陣: 51.9%(482/928)
複縦陣: 47.2%(488/1033)
輪形陣: 48.9%(496/1014)
梯形陣: 54.4%(565/1039)
単横陣: 55.5%(491/885)
所以體感上單橫比較會閃有可能不是錯覺
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.113.250.44
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/KanColle/M.1433564813.A.779.html
→
06/06 12:31, , 1F
06/06 12:31, 1F
推
06/06 12:31, , 2F
06/06 12:31, 2F
推
06/06 12:32, , 3F
06/06 12:32, 3F
→
06/06 12:33, , 4F
06/06 12:33, 4F
推
06/06 12:34, , 5F
06/06 12:34, 5F
→
06/06 12:34, , 6F
06/06 12:34, 6F
※ 編輯: jimmy123678 (140.113.250.44), 06/06/2015 12:35:32
→
06/06 12:40, , 7F
06/06 12:40, 7F
推
06/06 12:46, , 8F
06/06 12:46, 8F
推
06/06 12:48, , 9F
06/06 12:48, 9F
→
06/06 12:49, , 10F
06/06 12:49, 10F
推
06/06 12:58, , 11F
06/06 12:58, 11F
推
06/06 12:58, , 12F
06/06 12:58, 12F
→
06/06 12:59, , 13F
06/06 12:59, 13F
推
06/06 13:01, , 14F
06/06 13:01, 14F
推
06/06 13:01, , 15F
06/06 13:01, 15F
→
06/06 13:01, , 16F
06/06 13:01, 16F
→
06/06 13:01, , 17F
06/06 13:01, 17F
→
06/06 13:01, , 18F
06/06 13:01, 18F
推
06/06 13:02, , 19F
06/06 13:02, 19F
→
06/06 13:03, , 20F
06/06 13:03, 20F
→
06/06 13:03, , 21F
06/06 13:03, 21F
推
06/06 13:04, , 22F
06/06 13:04, 22F
推
06/06 13:06, , 23F
06/06 13:06, 23F
→
06/06 13:07, , 24F
06/06 13:07, 24F
→
06/06 13:07, , 25F
06/06 13:07, 25F
→
06/06 13:12, , 26F
06/06 13:12, 26F
→
06/06 13:12, , 27F
06/06 13:12, 27F
→
06/06 13:13, , 28F
06/06 13:13, 28F
推
06/06 13:15, , 29F
06/06 13:15, 29F
推
06/06 13:16, , 30F
06/06 13:16, 30F
→
06/06 13:16, , 31F
06/06 13:16, 31F
→
06/06 13:17, , 32F
06/06 13:17, 32F
→
06/06 13:18, , 33F
06/06 13:18, 33F
推
06/06 13:18, , 34F
06/06 13:18, 34F
→
06/06 13:19, , 35F
06/06 13:19, 35F
推
06/06 13:19, , 36F
06/06 13:19, 36F
→
06/06 13:24, , 37F
06/06 13:24, 37F
→
06/06 13:25, , 38F
06/06 13:25, 38F
→
06/06 13:26, , 39F
06/06 13:26, 39F
推
06/06 13:27, , 40F
06/06 13:27, 40F
推
06/06 13:28, , 41F
06/06 13:28, 41F
→
06/06 13:29, , 42F
06/06 13:29, 42F
推
06/06 13:29, , 43F
06/06 13:29, 43F
推
06/06 14:02, , 44F
06/06 14:02, 44F
→
06/06 14:48, , 45F
06/06 14:48, 45F
→
06/06 14:54, , 46F
06/06 14:54, 46F
→
06/06 14:56, , 47F
06/06 14:56, 47F
推
06/06 14:58, , 48F
06/06 14:58, 48F
→
06/06 14:59, , 49F
06/06 14:59, 49F
→
06/06 14:59, , 50F
06/06 14:59, 50F
推
06/06 15:00, , 51F
06/06 15:00, 51F
→
06/06 15:00, , 52F
06/06 15:00, 52F
推
06/06 15:20, , 53F
06/06 15:20, 53F
→
06/06 15:29, , 54F
06/06 15:29, 54F
→
06/06 16:22, , 55F
06/06 16:22, 55F
→
06/06 16:25, , 56F
06/06 16:25, 56F
→
06/06 16:25, , 57F
06/06 16:25, 57F
推
06/06 16:34, , 58F
06/06 16:34, 58F
推
06/06 16:36, , 59F
06/06 16:36, 59F
推
06/06 16:51, , 60F
06/06 16:51, 60F
推
06/06 16:57, , 61F
06/06 16:57, 61F
→
06/06 17:01, , 62F
06/06 17:01, 62F
推
06/06 17:01, , 63F
06/06 17:01, 63F
推
06/06 17:22, , 64F
06/06 17:22, 64F
推
06/06 19:25, , 65F
06/06 19:25, 65F
推
06/06 19:32, , 66F
06/06 19:32, 66F
推
06/06 22:00, , 67F
06/06 22:00, 67F
推
06/07 10:17, , 68F
06/07 10:17, 68F
→
06/07 13:31, , 69F
06/07 13:31, 69F
討論串 (同標題文章)