[閒聊] 戰術敗北的判定是不是該改掉?
我一直很討厭戰術敗北的判定,因為它是以擊沉對方多少比例的船來算,
但這樣很不公平,比方說明明重創了對方好幾艘船,只因為沒有擊沉,
所以就被判定敗北,我怎樣想都覺得這樣的算法是不對的,
不知道有沒有人跟我一樣,覺得戰術敗的標準應該改變算法的?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.184.35.117
推
11/18 22:20, , 1F
11/18 22:20, 1F
我戰功條比對方長很多,結果還是判定敗,所以覺得超嘔啊。
※ 編輯: jeanvanjohn 來自: 111.184.35.117 (11/18 22:21)
推
11/18 22:20, , 2F
11/18 22:20, 2F
→
11/18 22:21, , 3F
11/18 22:21, 3F
→
11/18 22:21, , 4F
11/18 22:21, 4F
→
11/18 22:21, , 5F
11/18 22:21, 5F
推
11/18 22:22, , 6F
11/18 22:22, 6F
推
11/18 22:22, , 7F
11/18 22:22, 7F
推
11/18 22:22, , 8F
11/18 22:22, 8F
推
11/18 22:23, , 9F
11/18 22:23, 9F
推
11/18 22:23, , 10F
11/18 22:23, 10F
→
11/18 22:24, , 11F
11/18 22:24, 11F
→
11/18 22:24, , 12F
11/18 22:24, 12F
→
11/18 22:24, , 13F
11/18 22:24, 13F
→
11/18 22:25, , 14F
11/18 22:25, 14F
→
11/18 22:29, , 15F
11/18 22:29, 15F
→
11/18 22:29, , 16F
11/18 22:29, 16F
→
11/18 22:29, , 17F
11/18 22:29, 17F
→
11/18 22:30, , 18F
11/18 22:30, 18F
→
11/18 22:30, , 19F
11/18 22:30, 19F
→
11/18 22:31, , 20F
11/18 22:31, 20F
→
11/18 22:32, , 21F
11/18 22:32, 21F
推
11/18 22:37, , 22F
11/18 22:37, 22F
推
11/18 22:38, , 23F
11/18 22:38, 23F
→
11/18 22:39, , 24F
11/18 22:39, 24F
→
11/18 22:40, , 25F
11/18 22:40, 25F
→
11/18 22:42, , 26F
11/18 22:42, 26F
推
11/18 22:44, , 27F
11/18 22:44, 27F
→
11/18 22:44, , 28F
11/18 22:44, 28F
→
11/18 22:46, , 29F
11/18 22:46, 29F
推
11/18 22:51, , 30F
11/18 22:51, 30F
推
11/18 22:53, , 31F
11/18 22:53, 31F
→
11/18 22:54, , 32F
11/18 22:54, 32F
推
11/18 22:57, , 33F
11/18 22:57, 33F
推
11/18 22:58, , 34F
11/18 22:58, 34F
推
11/18 22:59, , 35F
11/18 22:59, 35F
噓
11/18 23:15, , 36F
11/18 23:15, 36F
→
11/18 23:50, , 37F
11/18 23:50, 37F
→
11/18 23:51, , 38F
11/18 23:51, 38F
推
11/18 23:52, , 39F
11/18 23:52, 39F
推
11/18 23:55, , 40F
11/18 23:55, 40F
→
11/18 23:56, , 41F
11/18 23:56, 41F
推
11/19 00:00, , 42F
11/19 00:00, 42F
→
11/19 00:05, , 43F
11/19 00:05, 43F
→
11/19 00:16, , 44F
11/19 00:16, 44F
推
11/19 00:19, , 45F
11/19 00:19, 45F
→
11/19 00:26, , 46F
11/19 00:26, 46F
推
11/19 00:27, , 47F
11/19 00:27, 47F
→
11/19 00:27, , 48F
11/19 00:27, 48F
推
11/19 00:28, , 49F
11/19 00:28, 49F
推
11/19 00:30, , 50F
11/19 00:30, 50F
推
11/19 00:31, , 51F
11/19 00:31, 51F
→
11/19 00:34, , 52F
11/19 00:34, 52F
推
11/19 00:35, , 53F
11/19 00:35, 53F
推
11/19 00:36, , 54F
11/19 00:36, 54F
推
11/19 00:40, , 55F
11/19 00:40, 55F
→
11/19 01:07, , 56F
11/19 01:07, 56F
推
11/19 01:32, , 57F
11/19 01:32, 57F
→
11/19 01:35, , 58F
11/19 01:35, 58F
推
11/19 03:02, , 59F
11/19 03:02, 59F
→
11/19 13:52, , 60F
11/19 13:52, 60F