[討教]為啥降龍十八掌不強調要有內力做後盾
降龍十八掌學了之後
武功就可以直接跳級
打掉原本比你強的對手
照射鵰中的描述(洪七公教郭靖那段)
降龍十八掌幾乎只是一種招式
完全沒提到啥用力的法門(類似乾坤大挪移)或是固本培元的內力培養
何以學了之後馬上就能大幅升級呢?
這明明就是一種硬碰硬的外功啊
掃地僧評價:降龍十八掌剛猛第一
個人以為最佳組合是
九陽真經+降龍十八掌
至陽+至剛
這樣應該才能完全發揮降龍十八掌吧
郭靖的九陰+降龍十八掌
感覺菜色就是配得怪怪的
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.132.221.148
※ 編輯: anshley 來自: 220.132.221.148 (11/21 21:48)
推
11/21 21:52, , 1F
11/21 21:52, 1F
推
11/21 21:52, , 2F
11/21 21:52, 2F
→
11/21 21:52, , 3F
11/21 21:52, 3F
推
11/21 22:02, , 4F
11/21 22:02, 4F
推
11/21 22:04, , 5F
11/21 22:04, 5F
→
11/21 22:04, , 6F
11/21 22:04, 6F
→
11/21 22:04, , 7F
11/21 22:04, 7F
推
11/21 22:27, , 8F
11/21 22:27, 8F
→
11/21 22:36, , 9F
11/21 22:36, 9F
推
11/21 23:06, , 10F
11/21 23:06, 10F
推
11/21 23:20, , 11F
11/21 23:20, 11F
→
11/21 23:24, , 12F
11/21 23:24, 12F
推
11/21 23:45, , 13F
11/21 23:45, 13F
→
11/21 23:46, , 14F
11/21 23:46, 14F
→
11/21 23:47, , 15F
11/21 23:47, 15F
推
11/21 23:51, , 16F
11/21 23:51, 16F
→
11/21 23:51, , 17F
11/21 23:51, 17F
推
11/21 23:54, , 18F
11/21 23:54, 18F
推
11/21 23:55, , 19F
11/21 23:55, 19F
推
11/21 23:55, , 20F
11/21 23:55, 20F
→
11/21 23:56, , 21F
11/21 23:56, 21F
→
11/21 23:56, , 22F
11/21 23:56, 22F
→
11/22 00:01, , 23F
11/22 00:01, 23F
推
11/22 00:04, , 24F
11/22 00:04, 24F
→
11/22 00:04, , 25F
11/22 00:04, 25F
→
11/22 00:05, , 26F
11/22 00:05, 26F
推
11/22 00:05, , 27F
11/22 00:05, 27F
→
11/22 00:07, , 28F
11/22 00:07, 28F
→
11/22 01:31, , 29F
11/22 01:31, 29F
→
11/22 01:32, , 30F
11/22 01:32, 30F
推
11/22 01:35, , 31F
11/22 01:35, 31F
→
11/22 01:35, , 32F
11/22 01:35, 32F
推
11/22 02:08, , 33F
11/22 02:08, 33F
→
11/22 02:10, , 34F
11/22 02:10, 34F
→
11/22 02:11, , 35F
11/22 02:11, 35F
→
11/22 02:12, , 36F
11/22 02:12, 36F
→
11/22 02:13, , 37F
11/22 02:13, 37F
→
11/22 02:14, , 38F
11/22 02:14, 38F
推
11/22 02:26, , 39F
11/22 02:26, 39F
→
11/22 02:27, , 40F
11/22 02:27, 40F
推
11/22 02:36, , 41F
11/22 02:36, 41F
→
11/22 02:36, , 42F
11/22 02:36, 42F
推
11/22 02:40, , 43F
11/22 02:40, 43F
推
11/22 02:47, , 44F
11/22 02:47, 44F
→
11/22 02:48, , 45F
11/22 02:48, 45F
→
11/22 02:49, , 46F
11/22 02:49, 46F
→
11/22 02:49, , 47F
11/22 02:49, 47F
→
11/22 02:50, , 48F
11/22 02:50, 48F
→
11/22 02:51, , 49F
11/22 02:51, 49F
→
11/22 02:54, , 50F
11/22 02:54, 50F
→
11/22 02:55, , 51F
11/22 02:55, 51F
→
11/22 02:56, , 52F
11/22 02:56, 52F
→
11/22 02:56, , 53F
11/22 02:56, 53F
→
11/22 02:59, , 54F
11/22 02:59, 54F
→
11/22 03:00, , 55F
11/22 03:00, 55F
推
11/22 08:20, , 56F
11/22 08:20, 56F
→
11/22 08:21, , 57F
11/22 08:21, 57F
推
11/22 08:58, , 58F
11/22 08:58, 58F
推
11/22 11:00, , 59F
11/22 11:00, 59F
→
11/22 11:00, , 60F
11/22 11:00, 60F
→
11/22 11:01, , 61F
11/22 11:01, 61F
推
11/26 20:08, , 62F
11/26 20:08, 62F
→
11/26 20:08, , 63F
11/26 20:08, 63F
→
11/26 20:10, , 64F
11/26 20:10, 64F
→
11/26 20:11, , 65F
11/26 20:11, 65F
→
11/26 20:12, , 66F
11/26 20:12, 66F
→
11/26 20:14, , 67F
11/26 20:14, 67F
→
12/06 03:59, , 68F
12/06 03:59, 68F
推
12/06 04:01, , 69F
12/06 04:01, 69F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 8 篇):