[討教] 不用隔空氣勁 = 武功不高強?
似乎常常看見在討論誰功夫高不高強的時候
都會提到有沒有隔空氣勁的問題
可是金庸書上好像只有提到以下的邏輯
『能使出隔空氣勁 → 武功高強』
這正常的邏輯推論,應該也只能推論出
『武功不高強 → 使不出隔空氣勁』
這種結論
但是應該是導不出下面這種
『使不出隔空氣勁 → 武功不高強』
『沒使出隔空氣勁 → 武功不高強』
之類的結論才對啊...
還是說金書中有哪段的內容提到上面證不出來的這兩句?
到底大家是用金書中的哪段為依據
來說明兩個武功高強的人之間誰高誰低可以用隔空氣勁來判斷的?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.63.109.7
推
11/05 23:05, , 1F
11/05 23:05, 1F
推
11/05 23:36, , 2F
11/05 23:36, 2F
→
11/05 23:46, , 3F
11/05 23:46, 3F
推
11/06 00:10, , 4F
11/06 00:10, 4F
噓
11/06 00:32, , 5F
11/06 00:32, 5F
→
11/06 00:33, , 6F
11/06 00:33, 6F
噓
11/06 00:33, , 7F
11/06 00:33, 7F
→
11/06 00:34, , 8F
11/06 00:34, 8F
→
11/06 00:34, , 9F
11/06 00:34, 9F
→
11/06 00:36, , 10F
11/06 00:36, 10F
→
11/06 00:37, , 11F
11/06 00:37, 11F
→
11/06 00:38, , 12F
11/06 00:38, 12F
→
11/06 00:38, , 13F
11/06 00:38, 13F
→
11/06 00:40, , 14F
11/06 00:40, 14F
→
11/06 00:49, , 15F
11/06 00:49, 15F
→
11/06 00:49, , 16F
11/06 00:49, 16F
推
11/06 01:03, , 17F
11/06 01:03, 17F
→
11/06 01:04, , 18F
11/06 01:04, 18F
→
11/06 01:12, , 19F
11/06 01:12, 19F
→
11/06 01:20, , 20F
11/06 01:20, 20F
→
11/06 01:21, , 21F
11/06 01:21, 21F
→
11/06 01:21, , 22F
11/06 01:21, 22F
→
11/06 01:22, , 23F
11/06 01:22, 23F
→
11/06 01:22, , 24F
11/06 01:22, 24F
→
11/06 01:23, , 25F
11/06 01:23, 25F
→
11/06 01:24, , 26F
11/06 01:24, 26F
→
11/06 01:25, , 27F
11/06 01:25, 27F
→
11/06 01:25, , 28F
11/06 01:25, 28F
→
11/06 01:27, , 29F
11/06 01:27, 29F
→
11/06 01:27, , 30F
11/06 01:27, 30F
→
11/06 01:29, , 31F
11/06 01:29, 31F
→
11/06 01:30, , 32F
11/06 01:30, 32F
→
11/06 01:30, , 33F
11/06 01:30, 33F
→
11/06 01:31, , 34F
11/06 01:31, 34F
→
11/06 01:32, , 35F
11/06 01:32, 35F
→
11/06 01:33, , 36F
11/06 01:33, 36F
→
11/06 01:33, , 37F
11/06 01:33, 37F
→
11/06 01:34, , 38F
11/06 01:34, 38F
→
11/06 01:34, , 39F
11/06 01:34, 39F
→
11/06 01:35, , 40F
11/06 01:35, 40F
→
11/06 01:36, , 41F
11/06 01:36, 41F
→
11/06 01:37, , 42F
11/06 01:37, 42F
→
11/06 01:37, , 43F
11/06 01:37, 43F
→
11/06 01:38, , 44F
11/06 01:38, 44F
→
11/06 01:39, , 45F
11/06 01:39, 45F
→
11/06 01:41, , 46F
11/06 01:41, 46F
推
11/06 01:43, , 47F
11/06 01:43, 47F
→
11/06 01:43, , 48F
11/06 01:43, 48F
→
11/06 01:44, , 49F
11/06 01:44, 49F
→
11/06 01:44, , 50F
11/06 01:44, 50F
→
11/06 01:45, , 51F
11/06 01:45, 51F
→
11/06 01:46, , 52F
11/06 01:46, 52F
→
11/06 01:47, , 53F
11/06 01:47, 53F
→
11/06 01:48, , 54F
11/06 01:48, 54F
→
11/06 01:48, , 55F
11/06 01:48, 55F
→
11/06 01:50, , 56F
11/06 01:50, 56F
→
11/06 01:50, , 57F
11/06 01:50, 57F
→
11/06 01:51, , 58F
11/06 01:51, 58F
→
11/06 01:52, , 59F
11/06 01:52, 59F
→
11/06 01:52, , 60F
11/06 01:52, 60F
→
11/06 01:54, , 61F
11/06 01:54, 61F
→
11/06 01:54, , 62F
11/06 01:54, 62F
→
11/06 01:55, , 63F
11/06 01:55, 63F
→
11/06 01:56, , 64F
11/06 01:56, 64F
→
11/06 01:58, , 65F
11/06 01:58, 65F
→
11/06 01:58, , 66F
11/06 01:58, 66F
→
11/06 01:59, , 67F
11/06 01:59, 67F
→
11/06 02:02, , 68F
11/06 02:02, 68F
→
11/06 02:03, , 69F
11/06 02:03, 69F
→
11/06 02:05, , 70F
11/06 02:05, 70F
→
11/06 02:06, , 71F
11/06 02:06, 71F
→
11/06 02:08, , 72F
11/06 02:08, 72F
→
11/06 07:57, , 73F
11/06 07:57, 73F
→
11/06 07:58, , 74F
11/06 07:58, 74F
→
11/06 07:58, , 75F
11/06 07:58, 75F
→
11/06 08:00, , 76F
11/06 08:00, 76F
→
11/06 08:01, , 77F
11/06 08:01, 77F
→
11/06 08:01, , 78F
11/06 08:01, 78F
→
11/06 12:02, , 79F
11/06 12:02, 79F
→
11/06 12:22, , 80F
11/06 12:22, 80F
→
11/06 12:33, , 81F
11/06 12:33, 81F
→
11/06 12:36, , 82F
11/06 12:36, 82F
→
11/06 12:39, , 83F
11/06 12:39, 83F
→
11/06 12:40, , 84F
11/06 12:40, 84F
→
11/06 12:41, , 85F
11/06 12:41, 85F
→
11/06 12:42, , 86F
11/06 12:42, 86F
推
11/06 13:47, , 87F
11/06 13:47, 87F
→
11/06 13:47, , 88F
11/06 13:47, 88F
→
11/06 13:48, , 89F
11/06 13:48, 89F
→
11/06 13:50, , 90F
11/06 13:50, 90F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):