Re: [討論] 火箭打十場了...
Lin off bench
That’s just silly! Lin dropped 45pxs 12ast5 rbs & 9 trays as the starting
shooting guard.
The only reason to start Beverly is theyhope to marginalized Lin’s star
power.
It’s all about Harden and Howard.
They don’t fear Parson’s as a “brand”, sohis good play isn’t an issue.
But every time Lin does something like theother night with the 9 three’s
which tied Robert Horry’s 1997 mark,
THIS causes them a problem
LINSANITY…THEY DO NOT WANT.
And this is on Harden.
Look at the last time Harden had a boo boo,last year.
Lin dropped 37 that night, and suddenlyHarden is well.
If Lin had got Harden’s calls the othernight, he’d scored 40 easy.
Lin plays well because he’s that good.
It’s not a trick. He’s not lucky.
You don’t have as many of those types ofgames that he’s had if it’s luck.
There is no basketball reason to bestarting Beverly. This is pure politics.
by Sparkkspark on 11.16.13 1:08pm
…………………………………
這是美國一位球迷的文章,由百度林吧的網友小美76翻譯,
我認為這篇的看法頗一針見血,可以參考看看.
林從板凳出發
大簡直太蠢了!林在擔任先發得分後衛時拿了34分12助5板9個三分球
讓小貝先發的唯一理由就是他們希望將林的球星效應邊緣話
一切都與哈登和魔獸有關
他們並不擔心帕帥的品牌效應,所以帕帥的好表現不會是問題
但每次林做了什麼向那天晚上9記三分球追平羅伯特何理1997年成績的事情時
那就會給他們找難題
林瘋狂...他們並不要看見這個.
而這個得怪哈登
看看上一次哈登去年受傷的時候
那個晚上林拿了37分,而突然之間哈登就康復了
那晚如果林拿能到哈登的吹哨的話,他輕易就能得到40分
林打的好是因為他就是那麼好
那不是花招,他不是好運
如果只是好運的話,就不會有那麼多場像林所打出的那種類型的比賽
讓小貝先發不是籃球上的理由,這只是純粹籃球政治學.
===
個人感想
類似的想法之前也有不少鄉民在討論,不過這篇更為明白直接的直指核心,
目前的火箭隊看起來的確是有類似的矛盾,
他們希望Lin打的好,但他們不希望Lin搶了哈登的鋒頭.
所以火箭無預警的,同時對外鬼扯一些似是而非的理由把Lin降下了替補,
但實際上場時間卻又比小貝多,同時第四節的關門戰Lin在場上的時間也越來越高.
而從Lin實際上場時間和先發時的34分12助表現來看,
Lin打的好純粹就是因為Lin打的好,跟先發替補的啥鬼調度理由無關.
看起來,Lin能去一個後場沒有與他同性質全明星的球隊對Lin來說應不是壞事
Lin可以去有老大的球隊,但這位老大最好不是後場球員,這樣才不會讓火箭這種鳥事
又再次上演,從這點來看,如果Lin真的被交易到了塞爾提克或其他可以遠離
這些是非的球隊,對Lin和Lin迷來說倒也不是壞事.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 36.226.97.215
→
11/18 14:53, , 1F
11/18 14:53, 1F
→
11/18 14:54, , 2F
11/18 14:54, 2F
尊重原文我就不修正了.
→
11/18 14:55, , 3F
11/18 14:55, 3F
※ 編輯: watwmark 來自: 36.226.97.215 (11/18 14:56)
推
11/18 14:57, , 4F
11/18 14:57, 4F
推
11/18 15:09, , 5F
11/18 15:09, 5F
→
11/18 15:10, , 6F
11/18 15:10, 6F
推
11/18 15:10, , 7F
11/18 15:10, 7F
→
11/18 15:11, , 8F
11/18 15:11, 8F
→
11/18 15:11, , 9F
11/18 15:11, 9F
→
11/18 15:11, , 10F
11/18 15:11, 10F
→
11/18 15:12, , 11F
11/18 15:12, 11F
→
11/18 15:14, , 12F
11/18 15:14, 12F
推
11/18 15:15, , 13F
11/18 15:15, 13F
→
11/18 15:15, , 14F
11/18 15:15, 14F
推
11/18 15:16, , 15F
11/18 15:16, 15F
推
11/18 15:16, , 16F
11/18 15:16, 16F
→
11/18 15:16, , 17F
11/18 15:16, 17F
推
11/18 15:17, , 18F
11/18 15:17, 18F
推
11/18 15:18, , 19F
11/18 15:18, 19F
→
11/18 15:18, , 20F
11/18 15:18, 20F
→
11/18 15:19, , 21F
11/18 15:19, 21F
→
11/18 15:19, , 22F
11/18 15:19, 22F
→
11/18 15:20, , 23F
11/18 15:20, 23F
推
11/18 15:21, , 24F
11/18 15:21, 24F
推
11/18 15:22, , 25F
11/18 15:22, 25F
→
11/18 15:25, , 26F
11/18 15:25, 26F
→
11/18 15:25, , 27F
11/18 15:25, 27F
推
11/18 15:26, , 28F
11/18 15:26, 28F
→
11/18 15:29, , 29F
11/18 15:29, 29F
推
11/18 15:37, , 30F
11/18 15:37, 30F
推
11/18 15:37, , 31F
11/18 15:37, 31F
→
11/18 15:37, , 32F
11/18 15:37, 32F
推
11/18 15:44, , 33F
11/18 15:44, 33F
→
11/18 15:44, , 34F
11/18 15:44, 34F
→
11/18 15:46, , 35F
11/18 15:46, 35F
→
11/18 15:46, , 36F
11/18 15:46, 36F
→
11/18 15:51, , 37F
11/18 15:51, 37F
推
11/18 15:52, , 38F
11/18 15:52, 38F
推
11/18 15:55, , 39F
11/18 15:55, 39F
→
11/18 15:55, , 40F
11/18 15:55, 40F
推
11/18 16:25, , 41F
11/18 16:25, 41F
推
11/18 16:54, , 42F
11/18 16:54, 42F
→
11/18 17:31, , 43F
11/18 17:31, 43F
→
11/18 17:32, , 44F
11/18 17:32, 44F
→
11/18 17:32, , 45F
11/18 17:32, 45F
推
11/18 17:33, , 46F
11/18 17:33, 46F
→
11/18 17:41, , 47F
11/18 17:41, 47F
推
11/18 17:41, , 48F
11/18 17:41, 48F
推
11/18 17:52, , 49F
11/18 17:52, 49F
推
11/18 18:02, , 50F
11/18 18:02, 50F
推
11/18 19:30, , 51F
11/18 19:30, 51F
推
11/18 19:40, , 52F
11/18 19:40, 52F
討論串 (同標題文章)