[外絮] How good is Jeremy Lin really?
國外這一串討論文裡面的 一個網友hysan 觀點實在是太棒了 值得翻譯
http://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/1qae7n/how_good_is_jeremy_lin_really/
不過對岸已經有人翻譯了 XD
林書豪吧
http://tieba.baidu.com/p/2702590899
原文(後面接翻譯)
The problem with Lin so far is that his career has been mired by having to
adjust to different coaches and to playing seemingly every type of PG style
imaginable.
In Golden State, his was told to work on his shooting and not to drive. Given
the lack of minutes, it might be good advice but it prevented him from
developing his best skill (which is why it took until now for him to learn to
use his left, which he has done very well this season). Basically, they
wanted him to be a traditional PG that doesn't score so they can slot him in
next to Monta or Curry.
In NY, he got to be an attacking PnR PG under D'Antoni. Then under Woodson,
he became more of a tempo pusher / setup PG.
Then last year in Houston, he was set to be a PnR PG again until they signed
Harden. Then they turned him into an offball PG (think any PG in Phil
Jackson's Triangle Offense except in a run & gun system - makes no sense).
Finally this year, they decided at the END of the summer to tell him that
he'd be playing as a 6th man scoring PG (think Jarett Jack but far far less
usage rate). thus marginalizing his opportunities to be a playmaker.
In his career, that means he has had to adapt and play to 5 different PG
playing styles. Of which, 4 of the style changes happened in under 2 years
(one summer of which was spent recovering from injury). And of which, only
one style really fits him as an inexperienced player. As a 3rd year pro, I
can't think of any player in any position that has had to deal with as much
change as Lin. So it is expected in my opinion that Lin should not be a good
decision maker at this point.
To rant a bit, it doesn't make much sense for anyone to judge how good Lin is
compared to any other PG right now because McHale hasn't decided how to use
Lin. We don't know what kind of PG Lin is/can/should be. So it is unfair to
compare him to other players who know their roles. I know people are annoyed
at McHale for not making Lin the primary playmaker, but I personally am
pissed at him for dumping Lin to 6th man and changing his role AT THE LAST
SECOND. It is a sign of a terrible coach when you cannot decide before
training camp what role to give to your "starting" PG. People can say what
they want of the D'Antonis, Mike Browns, and Larry Browns of the world. They
may not know how to best utilize all of their players but at least they
implement a system and force everyone to buy in. Players know what they have
to do and they go out and (try to) do it.
He was never drafted, so he obviously never got the same franchise investment
and opportunities as 1st round picks. Nor was he exactly in one of those
grooming and player development programs like the Spurs system with Pop.
Heck, the D-League team he was assigned to (Reno Bighorns) was shared by
several NBA teams because the Warriors didn't own a D-League team at the
time. He's been jerked around so much that he's had to constantly adapt his
playstyle and role.
I don't know what he'll look like when he hits free agency in 2 years, but he
won't reach his potential on the Rockets. His growth as a playmaking pg will
be limited since Harden plays point, and McHale wants Lin to play scoring
machine off the bench instead of facilitator.
Only thing that's certain is that Lin is a hard worker and very coachable and
will adjust. He'll probably be traded with Asik, or walk when his contract is
up. He won't reach his highest potential on the Rockets bench, just as Harden
couldn't reach his potential on OKC's bench (not saying that Lin is near
Harden in talent), and just as he would never have had Linsanity if he stayed
on the Rockets the first time around or on GSW's bench.
It'll be interesting to see where he ends up in 2yrs when he's a free agent
again, and what he'll look like. I hope he ends up on a team where he can
spread his wings and develop as a playmaking PG instead of being pigeonholed
as the off-ball scoring machine off the bench that McHale wants. What a waste
of Linsanity playmaking, PnR, and passing skills, if he's only asked to be a
scorer off the bench playing off the ball.
---------------------------------------------------------
翻譯
林目前的問題就是他的職業生涯陷入了需要為不同的教練調整,打出你能想像的各種方式
的控球後衛。
在金州勇士,他被指定練習他的投籃而不是運球。在他有限的上場時間裡,也許這是一個
好的建議,但是這阻止了他發展他的最強技能(這也是為什麼他直到現在才學會使用左手
,這個賽季發揮的很好的地方)。基本上,他們想要他成為一個傳統控衛,不需要得分,
所以他們可以把他和蒙塔或者庫裡組合。
在紐約,他在德安東尼下成為一名進攻型擋拆控衛。然後在伍德森下,他更像是一位節奏
帶領者或是發起進攻型控衛。
然後去年在休斯頓,他被設定成一位擋拆控衛,直到他們簽下哈登。然後他們把他變成無
球控衛(想像所有的那些在菲爾傑克遜三角進攻系統下的控衛,除非是在炮轟系統下,這
說不通)。
最後,今年,他們在夏天結束後告訴他讓他作為一個第六人得分型控衛(想像下Jarett
Jack,但是利用率要遠遠比他低),而忽視了他作為組織者的機會。
在他職業生涯,這意味著他需要適應並打出5中不同的控衛類型。其中,4種類型的轉換是
在2年內完成的(中間的夏天還花費了些時間從受傷中恢復)。並且這其中,只有一種方
式是他,作為一個缺乏經驗的球員,真正適合的。作為一個打過3個賽季的職業球員,我
無法想到任何一個位置上的任何一個球員需要處理像林這樣這麼多的類型變化。所以我的
觀點,林目前還不是一個好的決定者,也是可以想像的。
直接點說,任何人目前用林和其他控衛比較都是沒有道理的,因為海爾還沒有決定如何使
用林。我們不知道林會/應該/能夠成為什麼樣的控衛。所以把他和其他那些知道他們角色
的球員比較是不公平的。我知道人們對海爾不把林當成主要組織者感到反感,但是我個人
對他感到憤怒,因為他在最後時刻(註:指的是賽季開始前)改變了林的角色,把林扔到
了第六人位置上。這是一個糟糕的教練的信號,因為你不能在訓練營前決定你的「首發」
控衛的角色。這是一個糟糕的教練的信號,因為你不能在訓練營前決定你的「首發」
控衛的角色。人們說他們想要德安東尼,麥克布朗,拉裡布朗。他們也許不知道如何最大
使用他們所有球員,但是至少他們實施了系統,強迫讓所有人融入。球員們知道他們需要
做什麼,上了場並嘗試去做。
他選秀未被選中,所以他顯然不會得到那些1輪秀同樣的投入和機會。同時他也不在那些
球員發展優化的項目裡,比如像波波下的馬刺系統。天啊,他曾經簽約的發展聯盟球隊
Reno Bighorns也是幾個球隊共同擁有的,因為那時勇士隊沒有自己的發展聯盟球隊。他
被人扯來扯去,需要不停適應自己的打球方式和角色。
我不知道兩年後當他成為自由球員時會怎麼樣,但是他在火箭無法完全開發它的潛能。他
在組織型控衛方面的進步將被局限,因為哈登在組織,並且海爾希望林作為一個替補得分
機器,而不是一個引導者。
唯一確定的是,林非常努力,聽教練的話,願意去適應。他可能和阿西克一起被交易,或
者在合同結束後離開。他在火箭隊板凳上無法開發他的最大潛能,就像哈登無法在雷霆板
凳上開發最大潛能(不是說林在天賦上比哈登強),就像他如果當初依舊待在火箭隊或者
勇士隊的板凳上,他根本不會有Linsanity。
當他2年後成為自由球員會去哪,他會成為什麼樣子,這看起來將會很有趣。我希望他去
到一個能夠讓他充分舒展翅膀,發展他成為一個組織型控衛的球隊,而不是把他鎖在無球
替補得分控衛的籠子裡,就像海爾想的。這真是對Linsanity組織,擋拆,傳球能力的浪
費,如果他僅僅是作為一個替補得分機器,沒有控球權。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 122.116.180.191
推
11/14 22:32, , 1F
11/14 22:32, 1F
推
11/14 22:32, , 2F
11/14 22:32, 2F
→
11/14 22:33, , 3F
11/14 22:33, 3F
→
11/14 22:33, , 4F
11/14 22:33, 4F
推
11/14 22:33, , 5F
11/14 22:33, 5F
推
11/14 22:35, , 6F
11/14 22:35, 6F
推
11/14 22:35, , 7F
11/14 22:35, 7F
→
11/14 22:36, , 8F
11/14 22:36, 8F
推
11/14 22:39, , 9F
11/14 22:39, 9F
→
11/14 22:39, , 10F
11/14 22:39, 10F
推
11/14 22:41, , 11F
11/14 22:41, 11F
推
11/14 22:41, , 12F
11/14 22:41, 12F
推
11/14 22:41, , 13F
11/14 22:41, 13F
推
11/14 22:43, , 14F
11/14 22:43, 14F
推
11/14 22:44, , 15F
11/14 22:44, 15F
推
11/14 22:45, , 16F
11/14 22:45, 16F
推
11/14 22:49, , 17F
11/14 22:49, 17F
推
11/14 22:52, , 18F
11/14 22:52, 18F
推
11/14 22:52, , 19F
11/14 22:52, 19F
推
11/14 22:53, , 20F
11/14 22:53, 20F
→
11/14 22:53, , 21F
11/14 22:53, 21F
推
11/14 22:59, , 22F
11/14 22:59, 22F
推
11/14 22:59, , 23F
11/14 22:59, 23F
→
11/14 23:00, , 24F
11/14 23:00, 24F
→
11/14 23:00, , 25F
11/14 23:00, 25F
推
11/14 23:01, , 26F
11/14 23:01, 26F
推
11/14 23:02, , 27F
11/14 23:02, 27F
推
11/14 23:05, , 28F
11/14 23:05, 28F
推
11/14 23:06, , 29F
11/14 23:06, 29F
推
11/14 23:06, , 30F
11/14 23:06, 30F
推
11/14 23:10, , 31F
11/14 23:10, 31F
推
11/14 23:11, , 32F
11/14 23:11, 32F
推
11/14 23:14, , 33F
11/14 23:14, 33F
推
11/14 23:14, , 34F
11/14 23:14, 34F
→
11/14 23:15, , 35F
11/14 23:15, 35F
推
11/14 23:15, , 36F
11/14 23:15, 36F
推
11/14 23:15, , 37F
11/14 23:15, 37F
→
11/14 23:16, , 38F
11/14 23:16, 38F
→
11/14 23:17, , 39F
11/14 23:17, 39F
推
11/14 23:17, , 40F
11/14 23:17, 40F
推
11/14 23:18, , 41F
11/14 23:18, 41F
推
11/14 23:18, , 42F
11/14 23:18, 42F
→
11/14 23:19, , 43F
11/14 23:19, 43F
→
11/14 23:19, , 44F
11/14 23:19, 44F
推
11/14 23:19, , 45F
11/14 23:19, 45F
→
11/14 23:19, , 46F
11/14 23:19, 46F
→
11/14 23:20, , 47F
11/14 23:20, 47F
推
11/14 23:22, , 48F
11/14 23:22, 48F
推
11/14 23:22, , 49F
11/14 23:22, 49F
推
11/14 23:22, , 50F
11/14 23:22, 50F
推
11/14 23:22, , 51F
11/14 23:22, 51F
→
11/14 23:24, , 52F
11/14 23:24, 52F
→
11/14 23:24, , 53F
11/14 23:24, 53F
→
11/14 23:25, , 54F
11/14 23:25, 54F
推
11/14 23:26, , 55F
11/14 23:26, 55F
→
11/14 23:27, , 56F
11/14 23:27, 56F
推
11/14 23:31, , 57F
11/14 23:31, 57F
→
11/14 23:31, , 58F
11/14 23:31, 58F
→
11/14 23:33, , 59F
11/14 23:33, 59F
推
11/14 23:34, , 60F
11/14 23:34, 60F
→
11/14 23:35, , 61F
11/14 23:35, 61F
推
11/14 23:35, , 62F
11/14 23:35, 62F
→
11/14 23:37, , 63F
11/14 23:37, 63F
推
11/14 23:48, , 64F
11/14 23:48, 64F
推
11/14 23:52, , 65F
11/14 23:52, 65F
推
11/14 23:52, , 66F
11/14 23:52, 66F
→
11/14 23:53, , 67F
11/14 23:53, 67F
推
11/14 23:54, , 68F
11/14 23:54, 68F
推
11/15 00:02, , 69F
11/15 00:02, 69F
→
11/15 00:03, , 70F
11/15 00:03, 70F
→
11/15 00:05, , 71F
11/15 00:05, 71F
推
11/15 00:08, , 72F
11/15 00:08, 72F
→
11/15 00:08, , 73F
11/15 00:08, 73F
推
11/15 00:08, , 74F
11/15 00:08, 74F
推
11/15 00:16, , 75F
11/15 00:16, 75F
推
11/15 00:49, , 76F
11/15 00:49, 76F
→
11/15 01:01, , 77F
11/15 01:01, 77F
→
11/15 01:02, , 78F
11/15 01:02, 78F
推
11/15 01:10, , 79F
11/15 01:10, 79F
推
11/15 03:07, , 80F
11/15 03:07, 80F
→
11/15 03:08, , 81F
11/15 03:08, 81F
推
11/15 03:16, , 82F
11/15 03:16, 82F
推
11/15 04:20, , 83F
11/15 04:20, 83F
推
11/15 06:09, , 84F
11/15 06:09, 84F
→
11/15 06:10, , 85F
11/15 06:10, 85F
推
11/15 07:56, , 86F
11/15 07:56, 86F
推
11/15 08:11, , 87F
11/15 08:11, 87F
推
11/15 09:17, , 88F
11/15 09:17, 88F
推
11/15 09:25, , 89F
11/15 09:25, 89F
→
11/15 09:33, , 90F
11/15 09:33, 90F
推
11/15 13:56, , 91F
11/15 13:56, 91F
推
11/15 15:31, , 92F
11/15 15:31, 92F
推
11/15 15:48, , 93F
11/15 15:48, 93F
推
11/15 17:10, , 94F
11/15 17:10, 94F