[外絮] Revisiting Lin vs. Felton decision
資料來源:ESPN,http://goo.gl/Q7fbf
作者:kevin pelton
Revisiting Lin vs. Felton decision
From the standpoint of the New York Knicks, hoping to justify their decision
to let Jeremy Lin leave in free agency and replace him at point guard with
Raymond Felton, this season couldn't have started any better. Felton was
excellent during the month of November as the Knicks got off to a surprising
start, while Lin struggled to find his place next to James Harden with the
Houston Rockets.
對尼克隊而言,十一月開季戰績長紅加上Raymond Felton(Lin的替代品)大爆發多少合理
化夏天沒有留下Lin的決定,因為Lin表現不佳且還在學習如何與James Harden一起打球。
Some three months later, it's worth revisiting the Lin decision. Felton's
success, like his team's, has proved fleeting. Meanwhile, the Rockets and Lin
are one of the league's hottest teams.
過了三個再來看看這個決定,好不?Felton的爆發一閃即逝,而Lin的火箭則是聯盟最火
熱的球隊之一。
Misleading month
令人誤會的那個月
You remember November, right? President Barack Obama had just been
re-elected, Manti Te'o was merely a linebacker in contention for the Heisman,
and the Knicks were one of the NBA's best teams. Behind a flurry of
3-pointers and a smaller lineup with Carmelo Anthony at power forward, New
York started the season 14-4. The Knicks capped that stretch with their
second win over the Miami Heat and marked themselves as serious contenders in
the Eastern Conference.
還記得12月嗎?尼克隊是聯盟最強球隊之一。充滿激情的三分球和以Carmelo Anthony為
主的小個子先發陣容,讓尼克得到14-4戰績。包括兩次戰勝熱火的壯舉,也讓尼克成為東
區冠軍的熱門隊伍之一。
New York's backcourt of Felton and fellow newcomer Jason Kidd played a major
role in the fast start. Felton made 40 percent of his 3s in November while
averaging 14.6 points and 6.7 assists. Kidd was even better beyond the arc at
nearly 49 percent. As a team, the Knicks shot 41.6 percent from 3-point
range, powering the league's best offensive rating in the month.
Felton 和新同學Jason Kidd是這套快速球風的關鍵後場。Felton 12月的三分命中率超過
40%、平均得分14.6分、助攻6.7次,Kidd則有高於生涯平均的49%命中率。尼克隊的三分
命中率高達41.6%,是聯盟中進攻最犀利的隊伍。
Everyone said the shooting couldn't last, and it didn't. Since Dec. 1, New
York has shot exactly the league average (35.8 percent) on 3-pointers.
Felton, at 31.4 percent, has been even worse. The Knicks are still a very
good offensive team, ranking sixth in points per possession from December
onward, but not the juggernaut they once were.
但有人說"你以為可以天天過年嗎!",當然不行。自從12/1之後,尼克隊三分命中率回復
到聯盟平均35.8%,Felton只有31.4%。尼克還保持著每回合進攻得分排行第6的佳績,但
已經不再像是juggernaut般無敵(Xman中的怪物,比巨石強森還壯)。
At the same time, as the chart shows, the Rockets were making the opposite
transformation, with Lin as one of the leaders. As Houston has figured out
how to utilize both Harden and Lin, the Rockets' offense has gone from
solidly above average in November to elite. Lin's own statistics, as measured
by wins above replacement, have seen a similar boost.
同時,以Lin為主的火箭卻產生另外相反的變化。當火箭隊學會如何融合Lin和Harden,12
月份他們的進攻從平庸提升到了精英程度。Lin的wins above replacement數據也有成長
。
Knicks finding their level
尼克隊回歸現實
The Knicks, it turns out, are who we thought they were. Since peaking at
14-4, they have consistently played at about a 45-win pace -- matching
preseason expectations. Project that out through the rest of the schedule and
New York figures to finish somewhere around 49 wins, which should be good for
third in the East.
終究來說,尼克隊跟我們預期的一樣,除了14-4的高潮,漸漸走向平均45勝的節奏。預估
季末會有49勝左右的水準,占據東區第3。
Fears that the crosstown rival Brooklyn Nets will come back to win the
Atlantic Division are probably overstated. While the Nets have climbed within
two games in the standings, their point differential is barely better than
.500, suggesting they're likely to regress somewhat the rest of the way. The
same is true of the Atlanta Hawks, who sit fifth, leaving only the Chicago
Bulls with a healthy Derrick Rose as a serious threat to the Knicks'
top-three seed.
同城兄弟籃網不太可能超越老鷹進而贏過尼克,因為籃網只有領先兩場勝差,勝負分差只
有0.5多一點,最終會回歸正常。排名第6老鷹也是同樣狀況,所以唯一能威脅東區前三種
子只有缺少Rose的公牛隊。
Felton, it turns out, is also who we thought he was -- not quite as bad as he
looked during his disastrous 2011-12 campaign in Portland, but not as good as
he played during his first half-season in New York or the opening month this
season. As much as Felton's playmaking and his ability to generate steals
have helped the Knicks, he has had a tough time scoring efficiently since the
3s stopped falling. Felton is making just 42.4 percent of his 2-point
attempts and has seen his true shooting percentage slip to 47.5 percent --
far worse than the league average of 53.2 percent.
Felton也不出我們所料,雖不至於2011-12 拓荒者那樣悲慘,也無法超過上次在尼克隊的
高水準。當他三分命中下滑之後得分變得困難,就只能靠著抄截和指揮幫助球隊。
Felton 兩分命中率只有42.4%,真實命中率也只有47.5%,遠低於聯盟平均53.2%。
Moving beyond Linsanity
超越林來瘋
For both the Knicks and Lin himself, Linsanity has become a distant memory.
Gone are the headlines, the screaming fans and the incredible numbers Lin
posted as the Knicks' go-to player last February. Instead of getting
Linsanity, the Rockets ended up with Jeremy Lin, developing point guard.
對尼克和Lin來說,林來瘋已經遠去。頭條新聞、瘋狂球迷和瘋狂得分秀也是去年二月的
事了。火箭隊得到的Lin只是個開發中的控衛。
Playing next to Harden, Lin isn't the focal point of the Houston offense the
way he was during the stretch that made him a household name. However, he has
defied critics by showing the ability to thrive in that smaller role. In
part, that's because of the adjustments made by the Rockets' coaching staff.
It also reflects Lin's 3-point shooting regressing to the mean. After
shooting 26.3 percent from downtown in November, Lin is at 34.4 percent
since, making him something of a threat when opponents leave him open.
在Harden身邊的Lin,已經不是球隊的得分重心。而他無視旁人評論努力融入教練團設定
的角色球員之中。數據會回歸,Lin從本來的26.3%三分命中率回到34.4%,稱得上對手該
注意的威脅。
The funny thing is Lin's 2012-13 stat line is relatively similar in many ways
to what he did last year in New York. His effective field goal percentage,
for example, is an identical .478. The difference in Lin's offense is
entirely a matter of volume. He's down from using 28.1 percent of the Knicks'
plays to 20 percent of Houston's, putting him precisely at the typical
figure, and his assist rate has dropped by almost a third. Lin's overall
performance, All-Star caliber in 2011-12's limited sample, is slightly below
league average this season. That's a more sustainable level of play.
有趣的是,Lin的數據跟去年有許多相似之處。包括有效命中率effective field goal
47.8%、Lin的被使用率從尼克隊的28.8%下降到20%。助功率下降森三分之一。Lin的本季
表現比聯盟平均還低一些,尚有進步空間。
Looking ahead
往前看吧
Lin's ability to coexist with Harden, who doesn't use as many plays as
Anthony but tends to dominate the ball to a greater extent, leads naturally
to the question of whether Lin could have fit into an Anthony-centric offense
at Madison Square Garden.
Harden不像Anthony占據多數攻擊機會,卻傾向更全面的控制球權。讓人不禁想問 Lin能
否同樣適應Anthony為中心的麥迪遜花園廣場。
There are advantages to Lin's current situation. Houston's fast pace, and the
sheer number of pick-and-rolls the Rockets run as the basis of their offense,
give him more opportunity to play in space than he might have had in New
York. Still, it's not clear that Felton is any better fit for the Knicks than
Lin would have been. According to mySynergySports.com, the two players have
been about equally effective on spot-up opportunities, with Lin averaging
0.91 points per shot to Felton's 0.95. Surprisingly, Lin is a much more
frequent spot-up shooter.
因為快節奏,Lin明顯從火箭隊受益更多。加上pick'N roll的大量使用,讓Lin能在尼克
隊沒有的舒服空間打球。根據 mySynergySports.com,Lin和Felton的 spot-up 每次得分
為0.91分和0.95分差不多接近,但Lin得到spot-up的機會更為頻繁。
We're also comparing these players as they are now, not as they will be at
the end of the three-year contract Houston gave Lin. While Felton, 28, is
likely to be about the same player at that point if not take a slight step
backward, the 24-year-old Lin still has room to grow as an outside shooter
and playmaker.
我們是以目前比現來比較兩位球員,而不是3年合約後的Lin和Felton。3年後28歲的
Felton可能跟現在一樣不上不下。但是目前24歲的Lin仍有成長為射手和playmaker的空間
。
The Knicks won the early rounds of the Lin versus Felton decision. If Lin
already has pulled even, however, there may be no question who the better
choice was in a couple of years.
目前而言尼克隊對於Lin和Felton的決定是對的,但Lin照著目前節奏成長的話,他們兩人
誰比較好就不用多說了。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 163.25.118.240
→
03/20 22:39, , 1F
03/20 22:39, 1F
推
03/20 22:47, , 2F
03/20 22:47, 2F
→
03/20 22:48, , 3F
03/20 22:48, 3F
→
03/20 22:49, , 4F
03/20 22:49, 4F
推
03/20 22:53, , 5F
03/20 22:53, 5F
推
03/20 23:03, , 6F
03/20 23:03, 6F
→
03/20 23:03, , 7F
03/20 23:03, 7F
不好意思已經補完後面的部分。
※ 編輯: likeway 來自: 163.25.118.240 (03/20 23:24)
→
03/20 23:17, , 8F
03/20 23:17, 8F
推
03/20 23:19, , 9F
03/20 23:19, 9F
→
03/20 23:19, , 10F
03/20 23:19, 10F
→
03/20 23:20, , 11F
03/20 23:20, 11F
→
03/20 23:21, , 12F
03/20 23:21, 12F
推
03/20 23:22, , 13F
03/20 23:22, 13F
推
03/20 23:22, , 14F
03/20 23:22, 14F
→
03/20 23:23, , 15F
03/20 23:23, 15F
→
03/20 23:23, , 16F
03/20 23:23, 16F
推
03/20 23:23, , 17F
03/20 23:23, 17F
→
03/20 23:24, , 18F
03/20 23:24, 18F
推
03/20 23:26, , 19F
03/20 23:26, 19F
→
03/20 23:27, , 20F
03/20 23:27, 20F
推
03/20 23:28, , 21F
03/20 23:28, 21F
→
03/20 23:28, , 22F
03/20 23:28, 22F
推
03/20 23:29, , 23F
03/20 23:29, 23F
推
03/20 23:29, , 24F
03/20 23:29, 24F
→
03/20 23:29, , 25F
03/20 23:29, 25F
推
03/20 23:29, , 26F
03/20 23:29, 26F
→
03/20 23:29, , 27F
03/20 23:29, 27F
→
03/20 23:31, , 28F
03/20 23:31, 28F
推
03/20 23:32, , 29F
03/20 23:32, 29F
→
03/20 23:33, , 30F
03/20 23:33, 30F
推
03/20 23:34, , 31F
03/20 23:34, 31F
→
03/20 23:34, , 32F
03/20 23:34, 32F
→
03/20 23:34, , 33F
03/20 23:34, 33F
→
03/20 23:35, , 34F
03/20 23:35, 34F
→
03/20 23:35, , 35F
03/20 23:35, 35F
→
03/20 23:36, , 36F
03/20 23:36, 36F
推
03/20 23:36, , 37F
03/20 23:36, 37F
→
03/20 23:36, , 38F
03/20 23:36, 38F
還有 99 則推文
推
03/21 00:03, , 138F
03/21 00:03, 138F
→
03/21 00:03, , 139F
03/21 00:03, 139F
→
03/21 00:04, , 140F
03/21 00:04, 140F
→
03/21 00:05, , 141F
03/21 00:05, 141F
推
03/21 00:05, , 142F
03/21 00:05, 142F
→
03/21 00:05, , 143F
03/21 00:05, 143F
→
03/21 00:06, , 144F
03/21 00:06, 144F
→
03/21 00:06, , 145F
03/21 00:06, 145F
→
03/21 00:06, , 146F
03/21 00:06, 146F
推
03/21 00:07, , 147F
03/21 00:07, 147F
→
03/21 00:07, , 148F
03/21 00:07, 148F
→
03/21 00:08, , 149F
03/21 00:08, 149F
→
03/21 00:09, , 150F
03/21 00:09, 150F
→
03/21 00:09, , 151F
03/21 00:09, 151F
→
03/21 00:10, , 152F
03/21 00:10, 152F
推
03/21 00:10, , 153F
03/21 00:10, 153F
推
03/21 00:10, , 154F
03/21 00:10, 154F
推
03/21 00:11, , 155F
03/21 00:11, 155F
→
03/21 00:12, , 156F
03/21 00:12, 156F
推
03/21 00:12, , 157F
03/21 00:12, 157F
推
03/21 00:13, , 158F
03/21 00:13, 158F
推
03/21 00:14, , 159F
03/21 00:14, 159F
→
03/21 00:17, , 160F
03/21 00:17, 160F
推
03/21 00:22, , 161F
03/21 00:22, 161F
推
03/21 00:24, , 162F
03/21 00:24, 162F
推
03/21 00:28, , 163F
03/21 00:28, 163F
→
03/21 00:28, , 164F
03/21 00:28, 164F
→
03/21 00:29, , 165F
03/21 00:29, 165F
推
03/21 00:33, , 166F
03/21 00:33, 166F
→
03/21 00:35, , 167F
03/21 00:35, 167F
→
03/21 00:35, , 168F
03/21 00:35, 168F
→
03/21 00:36, , 169F
03/21 00:36, 169F
推
03/21 02:30, , 170F
03/21 02:30, 170F
→
03/21 02:30, , 171F
03/21 02:30, 171F
推
03/21 10:35, , 172F
03/21 10:35, 172F
推
03/21 10:37, , 173F
03/21 10:37, 173F
推
03/21 10:47, , 174F
03/21 10:47, 174F
→
03/21 10:58, , 175F
03/21 10:58, 175F
推
03/21 14:29, , 176F
03/21 14:29, 176F
→
03/25 10:07, , 177F
03/25 10:07, 177F
討論串 (同標題文章)