Re: [討論] Lin的中距離消失
※ 引述《zkow (難忘憶秋年)》之銘言:
: 最近這兩場比賽,林書豪的中距離可說是消失了
: 今天得分幾乎都是靠切入上籃,外線嘗試2顆沒進
: 也就是說,林書豪的攻擊模式有些改變
: 靠切入的好處是進籃率較高,也有買犯規的機會
: 但上場對熱火裁判不太賞臉,讓Lin幾次切入衝撞都鍛羽而歸
: 因此,在接下來的比賽中可以好好觀察
: Lin的中距離佔他攻擊次數多少
: 我是以為他應該還是要多嘗試中距離,以免投籃身手生疏
: 今天兩顆三分球投射未若以往出手果決,可能是一心想要分球的緣故
: 希望該攻擊時他還是能顧慮太多
我也挺贊同這樣的說法的...目前尼克中距離穩定的真的不多...
除了拳王以外的先發大將Anthony, Stoudemire, 都是缺少中距離的急停跳投...
而Lin也就是在對湖人以前的幾場會有中距離的單擋射球,
後來就開始專注於切傳...
(當然換個角度想, 現在他都是會被貼著防, 機會的確較少)
然而其他幾個, Fields, Shumpert, Jefriess, 也多是切近禁區攻擊,
少有在三分內邊緣停球出手的..(當然前兩個比較定位是全方位型的)
對中代表性的射手, J.R.Smith近期外線很不穩(可能是防守太積極了)
剩下就是Novak...他是少有難得三分不能投, 有機會還會帶一步進來投射兩分的..
然而體能的活躍度不足又使得他只能盡量在外圍找空檔出手...
所以的確尼克缺少一個能在中距離急停穩定度高的前鋒型射手SP...
往往這機會就是會看到Stoudemire外線空檔放槍,
而對手卻都能掌握到中距離的機會...
如果能補強這點,
尼克的攻擊火力依定更加旺盛!!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 163.21.252.206
推
03/02 09:25, , 1F
03/02 09:25, 1F
推
03/02 09:29, , 2F
03/02 09:29, 2F
→
03/02 09:29, , 3F
03/02 09:29, 3F
→
03/02 09:30, , 4F
03/02 09:30, 4F
→
03/02 09:30, , 5F
03/02 09:30, 5F
推
03/02 09:30, , 6F
03/02 09:30, 6F
→
03/02 09:30, , 7F
03/02 09:30, 7F
推
03/02 09:31, , 8F
03/02 09:31, 8F
→
03/02 09:31, , 9F
03/02 09:31, 9F
推
03/02 09:31, , 10F
03/02 09:31, 10F
→
03/02 09:32, , 11F
03/02 09:32, 11F
推
03/02 09:32, , 12F
03/02 09:32, 12F
→
03/02 09:32, , 13F
03/02 09:32, 13F
→
03/02 09:33, , 14F
03/02 09:33, 14F
→
03/02 09:33, , 15F
03/02 09:33, 15F
→
03/02 09:33, , 16F
03/02 09:33, 16F
推
03/02 09:34, , 17F
03/02 09:34, 17F
→
03/02 09:34, , 18F
03/02 09:34, 18F
→
03/02 09:34, , 19F
03/02 09:34, 19F
→
03/02 09:35, , 20F
03/02 09:35, 20F
推
03/02 09:38, , 21F
03/02 09:38, 21F
推
03/02 09:40, , 22F
03/02 09:40, 22F
→
03/02 09:41, , 23F
03/02 09:41, 23F
→
03/02 09:41, , 24F
03/02 09:41, 24F
→
03/02 09:42, , 25F
03/02 09:42, 25F
→
03/02 09:44, , 26F
03/02 09:44, 26F
推
03/02 09:44, , 27F
03/02 09:44, 27F
推
03/02 09:45, , 28F
03/02 09:45, 28F
→
03/02 09:45, , 29F
03/02 09:45, 29F
→
03/02 09:45, , 30F
03/02 09:45, 30F
→
03/02 09:46, , 31F
03/02 09:46, 31F
推
03/02 09:46, , 32F
03/02 09:46, 32F
→
03/02 09:48, , 33F
03/02 09:48, 33F
推
03/02 09:48, , 34F
03/02 09:48, 34F
推
03/02 09:49, , 35F
03/02 09:49, 35F
→
03/02 09:49, , 36F
03/02 09:49, 36F
→
03/02 09:50, , 37F
03/02 09:50, 37F
推
03/02 09:52, , 38F
03/02 09:52, 38F
→
03/02 09:52, , 39F
03/02 09:52, 39F
推
03/02 09:55, , 40F
03/02 09:55, 40F
推
03/02 09:55, , 41F
03/02 09:55, 41F
→
03/02 09:56, , 42F
03/02 09:56, 42F
→
03/02 09:58, , 43F
03/02 09:58, 43F
→
03/02 09:59, , 44F
03/02 09:59, 44F
推
03/02 09:59, , 45F
03/02 09:59, 45F
推
03/02 09:59, , 46F
03/02 09:59, 46F
噓
03/02 10:00, , 47F
03/02 10:00, 47F
→
03/02 10:00, , 48F
03/02 10:00, 48F
推
03/02 10:00, , 49F
03/02 10:00, 49F
推
03/02 10:02, , 50F
03/02 10:02, 50F
→
03/02 10:02, , 51F
03/02 10:02, 51F
→
03/02 10:03, , 52F
03/02 10:03, 52F
→
03/02 10:03, , 53F
03/02 10:03, 53F
→
03/02 10:04, , 54F
03/02 10:04, 54F
→
03/02 10:04, , 55F
03/02 10:04, 55F
→
03/02 10:07, , 56F
03/02 10:07, 56F
推
03/02 10:09, , 57F
03/02 10:09, 57F
→
03/02 10:10, , 58F
03/02 10:10, 58F
推
03/02 10:14, , 59F
03/02 10:14, 59F
推
03/02 10:27, , 60F
03/02 10:27, 60F
→
03/02 10:28, , 61F
03/02 10:28, 61F
推
03/02 10:29, , 62F
03/02 10:29, 62F
推
03/02 10:46, , 63F
03/02 10:46, 63F
推
03/02 10:49, , 64F
03/02 10:49, 64F
→
03/02 11:40, , 65F
03/02 11:40, 65F
推
03/02 11:57, , 66F
03/02 11:57, 66F
→
03/02 11:58, , 67F
03/02 11:58, 67F
噓
03/02 12:56, , 68F
03/02 12:56, 68F
推
03/02 16:03, , 69F
03/02 16:03, 69F
→
03/02 16:08, , 70F
03/02 16:08, 70F
→
03/02 16:09, , 71F
03/02 16:09, 71F
→
03/02 16:10, , 72F
03/02 16:10, 72F
推
03/02 17:28, , 73F
03/02 17:28, 73F
→
03/02 18:26, , 74F
03/02 18:26, 74F
噓
03/02 18:43, , 75F
03/02 18:43, 75F
噓
03/03 06:00, , 76F
03/03 06:00, 76F
討論串 (同標題文章)