[閒聊] 為什麼要用<我與你>當作開場曲?消失
<我與你>這張專輯(以及這首歌)是1993年發行的,因為前後被<吻別>與<祝福>包夾,所以
這張專輯的光芒,一整個被蓋過去;加上<我與你>的同張專輯裡,有名曲<很想一生跟你走
>,所以<我與你>這首歌,只能說是大大的被比下去了。
結果,這次2017年的classic tour經典旅程演唱會的開唱曲,竟然是選這首<我與你>,歌
曲曲風本身算慢板,即使中段之後速度加快,但萬萬想不到會拿來被當作經典的開唱曲。
究竟,歌神張學友為什麼選擇這首<我與你>呢?各位30cm/D罩杯的學友鐵粉們,請問有什
麼見解呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.195.232.99
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Jacky/M.1488378587.A.539.html
※ 編輯: candysagaboy (123.195.232.99), 03/01/2017 22:30:47
→
03/01 22:35, , 1F
03/01 22:35, 1F
→
03/01 22:35, , 2F
03/01 22:35, 2F
推
03/01 23:00, , 3F
03/01 23:00, 3F
→
03/01 23:01, , 4F
03/01 23:01, 4F
→
03/01 23:02, , 5F
03/01 23:02, 5F
→
03/01 23:03, , 6F
03/01 23:03, 6F
→
03/01 23:03, , 7F
03/01 23:03, 7F
→
03/01 23:03, , 8F
03/01 23:03, 8F
推
03/02 02:55, , 9F
03/02 02:55, 9F
→
03/02 02:56, , 10F
03/02 02:56, 10F
→
03/02 02:58, , 11F
03/02 02:58, 11F
→
03/02 02:58, , 12F
03/02 02:58, 12F
→
03/02 03:00, , 13F
03/02 03:00, 13F
推
03/02 05:53, , 14F
03/02 05:53, 14F
→
03/02 05:53, , 15F
03/02 05:53, 15F
→
03/02 10:01, , 16F
03/02 10:01, 16F
推
03/02 11:11, , 17F
03/02 11:11, 17F
→
03/02 11:12, , 18F
03/02 11:12, 18F
→
03/02 11:17, , 19F
03/02 11:17, 19F
→
03/02 11:18, , 20F
03/02 11:18, 20F
→
03/02 11:19, , 21F
03/02 11:19, 21F
推
03/02 11:23, , 22F
03/02 11:23, 22F
推
03/02 12:21, , 23F
03/02 12:21, 23F
→
03/02 12:21, , 24F
03/02 12:21, 24F
→
03/02 12:43, , 25F
03/02 12:43, 25F
推
03/02 14:44, , 26F
03/02 14:44, 26F
→
03/02 14:44, , 27F
03/02 14:44, 27F
→
03/02 14:44, , 28F
03/02 14:44, 28F
→
03/02 14:44, , 29F
03/02 14:44, 29F
推
03/02 15:09, , 30F
03/02 15:09, 30F
推
03/02 15:28, , 31F
03/02 15:28, 31F
推
03/02 18:14, , 32F
03/02 18:14, 32F
→
03/02 18:15, , 33F
03/02 18:15, 33F
→
03/02 18:15, , 34F
03/02 18:15, 34F
→
03/02 18:16, , 35F
03/02 18:16, 35F
推
03/02 18:21, , 36F
03/02 18:21, 36F
→
03/02 18:23, , 37F
03/02 18:23, 37F
→
03/02 18:23, , 38F
03/02 18:23, 38F
→
03/02 18:25, , 39F
03/02 18:25, 39F
→
03/02 18:25, , 40F
03/02 18:25, 40F
→
03/02 18:26, , 41F
03/02 18:26, 41F
→
03/03 01:11, , 42F
03/03 01:11, 42F
推
03/03 01:25, , 43F
03/03 01:25, 43F
推
03/04 00:37, , 44F
03/04 00:37, 44F
推
03/04 17:46, , 45F
03/04 17:46, 45F
推
03/04 23:51, , 46F
03/04 23:51, 46F
→
03/04 23:51, , 47F
03/04 23:51, 47F
推
03/05 00:02, , 48F
03/05 00:02, 48F
推
03/05 16:37, , 49F
03/05 16:37, 49F
推
03/05 19:19, , 50F
03/05 19:19, 50F
推
03/05 22:23, , 51F
03/05 22:23, 51F
推
03/08 11:42, , 52F
03/08 11:42, 52F
推
03/09 11:08, , 53F
03/09 11:08, 53F
推
03/10 16:32, , 54F
03/10 16:32, 54F
→
03/10 16:32, , 55F
03/10 16:32, 55F
推
03/10 17:51, , 56F
03/10 17:51, 56F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):