[討論] 雙實支 第一間選國泰或富邦
各位網友晚安
家有新生兒 準備依apin大的罐頭保單建立基本保障 有一些不明之處求教
1、apin大建議富邦買兩單位 實支雜費可達17萬6
但富邦現售保單將實支雜費降到6萬多 買兩單位只有12萬 如此,富邦是否還是首選?
2、國泰人壽實支實付兩單位 雜費可達20萬 但金額與病房費共用
是否可想成:A:住的天數不高 自費用藥或自費醫療用具的費用較無疑慮
B:住的天數很長 病房費佔掉大部份的實支額度
若有用到高額的自費項目(支架,義肢) 實支額度就不夠給付
所以若住的天數長 反而富邦比國泰有優勢? 是否正確呢? 或是有思考漏洞?
3、雙實支一定要收正本 雜費又較高的保險公司是富邦6萬 國泰10萬 遠雄6萬
遠雄除了沒有再保公司 老闆現在被收押之外 是否還有其他問題呢
看版上也是很多人詢問的新生兒保單甚至成人是買遠雄的 遠雄是否可買呢?
或是有其他 雙實支限正本的首間保險公司推薦呢?
4、若無 在富邦跟國泰二選一的話 能否請各位網友推薦那間比較值得
謝謝大家
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 59.124.221.124
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Insurance/M.1505397206.A.BE8.html
→
09/14 21:57, , 1F
09/14 21:57, 1F
全球準備當第二實支買了 台灣人壽沒有研究耶... 罐頭保單不是富邦嗎@@
→
09/14 21:58, , 2F
09/14 21:58, 2F
→
09/14 21:58, , 3F
09/14 21:58, 3F
→
09/14 21:58, , 4F
09/14 21:58, 4F
→
09/14 21:59, , 5F
09/14 21:59, 5F
→
09/14 22:00, , 6F
09/14 22:00, 6F
→
09/14 22:00, , 7F
09/14 22:00, 7F
臉書是富邦嗎 剛剛看到nhr1才發現好像是富邦不是遠雄
S大您的意思是 以費用來看的話 富邦目前並沒有優勢 別間公司反而更好嗎?
→
09/14 22:00, , 8F
09/14 22:00, 8F
→
09/14 22:01, , 9F
09/14 22:01, 9F
→
09/14 22:02, , 10F
09/14 22:02, 10F
→
09/14 22:03, , 11F
09/14 22:03, 11F
是我看錯了 謝謝您的提醒
→
09/14 22:03, , 12F
09/14 22:03, 12F
→
09/14 22:04, , 13F
09/14 22:04, 13F
→
09/14 22:04, , 14F
09/14 22:04, 14F
→
09/14 22:07, , 15F
09/14 22:07, 15F
→
09/14 22:07, , 16F
09/14 22:07, 16F
我懂您的意思了 理賠的項目跟內容比正副本更重要 謝謝您的提醒
我有看到前一篇的回文提醒
沒想到富邦現在只剩下保證續保的意外險值得推薦
但是富邦實支實付保證續保
就算同樣保障之下 費率可能高一點 是否可列入加分考量呢?
※ 編輯: ck2oliver (59.124.221.124), 09/14/2017 22:11:47
→
09/14 22:12, , 17F
09/14 22:12, 17F
→
09/14 22:13, , 18F
09/14 22:13, 18F
→
09/14 22:14, , 19F
09/14 22:14, 19F
→
09/14 22:14, , 20F
09/14 22:14, 20F
→
09/14 22:14, , 21F
09/14 22:14, 21F
→
09/14 22:14, , 22F
09/14 22:14, 22F
→
09/14 22:16, , 23F
09/14 22:16, 23F
→
09/14 22:16, , 24F
09/14 22:16, 24F
推
09/14 23:18, , 25F
09/14 23:18, 25F
推
09/14 23:38, , 26F
09/14 23:38, 26F
→
09/15 00:28, , 27F
09/15 00:28, 27F
→
09/15 00:28, , 28F
09/15 00:28, 28F
→
09/15 00:28, , 29F
09/15 00:28, 29F
→
09/15 00:28, , 30F
09/15 00:28, 30F
→
09/15 00:28, , 31F
09/15 00:28, 31F
→
09/15 00:28, , 32F
09/15 00:28, 32F
→
09/15 00:28, , 33F
09/15 00:28, 33F
→
09/15 00:28, , 34F
09/15 00:28, 34F
→
09/15 00:28, , 35F
09/15 00:28, 35F
→
09/15 00:28, , 36F
09/15 00:28, 36F
→
09/15 00:28, , 37F
09/15 00:28, 37F
→
09/15 00:28, , 38F
09/15 00:28, 38F
→
09/15 00:28, , 39F
09/15 00:28, 39F
→
09/15 00:28, , 40F
09/15 00:28, 40F
→
09/15 00:28, , 41F
09/15 00:28, 41F
→
09/15 00:28, , 42F
09/15 00:28, 42F
→
09/15 00:28, , 43F
09/15 00:28, 43F
→
09/15 00:28, , 44F
09/15 00:28, 44F
→
09/15 00:28, , 45F
09/15 00:28, 45F
→
09/15 00:28, , 46F
09/15 00:28, 46F
→
09/15 00:28, , 47F
09/15 00:28, 47F
→
09/15 00:29, , 48F
09/15 00:29, 48F
→
09/15 00:29, , 49F
09/15 00:29, 49F
→
09/15 00:29, , 50F
09/15 00:29, 50F
→
09/15 00:29, , 51F
09/15 00:29, 51F
→
09/15 00:36, , 52F
09/15 00:36, 52F
→
09/15 00:50, , 53F
09/15 00:50, 53F
推
09/16 11:22, , 54F
09/16 11:22, 54F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
討論
3
54