Re: [新聞] Grassley 不再擋 HR 3012 了

看板Immigration作者 (Inspire me!)時間12年前 (2012/07/12 22:18), 編輯推噓3(305)
留言8則, 3人參與, 最新討論串6/16 (看更多)
轉貼Trackitt.com上面的人的分析: 通過HR 3012接下來得完成的步驟 (Posted by Gravitation) The next steps are: 1. It's brought to the floor for voting in Senate. 2. It's brought to House again for voting due to amendments introduced in the Senate. 3. If any amendments are approved by house, a conference committee of House and Senate makes a compromise bill. 4. Compromised bill is brought for an up or down vote in Senate. 5. Compromised bill is brought to House for an up and down vote. 6. President needs to sign it. 7. USCIS begins rule-making process. The first 5 steps have to be _completed_ in the next two weeks... or its chances of passing fall dramatically due to beginning of the election cycle. It has a long way to go. He lifted his hold but insisted on an amendment as a condition. It doesn't matter how simple or significant the amendment is, because as long as an amendment is there, it'll go back to the house... and mostly likely they'll add an amendment... and it'll either come back to the Senate or have to go through a conference committee... Anybody knows that it's like building a skyscraper in two weeks. While it's within the realm of possibility for this bill to go fast... Congress (especially _this_ congress) is not known for its efficiency. ---- (Posted by peppermint82) One of the probable reasons Grassley lifted his hold may be that he knows as good as anybody that there's a very little chance of it passing due to the tight calendar in both chambers of congress. My feedback: The bill has passed just one hurdle. We don't know the: 1) Amendments. The devil is in the details. How are the amendments going to affect current H1B, I485 Pending, those who are planning to file for GC in coming years. 2) If senate/companies etc are even going to agree with he amendments, if the amendments are not granted, the Grassley will put a hold again. Long story short, nothing progressive until at least 1 year. Folks need to understand that the HR 3012 Bill was for removing per country cap only.Grassland put a hold on it only because he wanted changes to the H1B program and there was no other way he was going to get it. This is how politics work. ※ 引述《Iwish (Plowing)》之銘言: : ※ 引述《jen26 (jen)》之銘言: : : 最後的希望.. : : 抓緊時間連絡 Scott Brown 和 Chuck Schumer要他們把Irish 的E-3 Visa Bill加進 : : HR3012。 : : 一定要在這個法案在參議院投票前,再多加一些有爭議性的東西進去。這樣才能夠多 : : 拖延時間。參議院只剩下17個工作天的議期。撐過這17天,離大選就會更近,移民法 : : 案就會比較被擱置在一旁。 : : Scott Brown- : : https://www.scottbrown.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contactme : : Chuck Schumer- : : https://www.schumer.senate.gov/Contact/contact_chuck.cfm : America Benefits 有一封範例的信 : http://americabenefits.org/forums/index.php?topic=289.0 : 大家可以把信寄到Scott Brown 和 Chuck Schumer的信箱 : 加油! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 71.60.234.36

07/13 01:34, , 1F
這就跟我上面講的一樣,來來回回幾趟...
07/13 01:34, 1F

07/13 01:35, , 2F
最後只要拖過這個會期,一切都要從來...
07/13 01:35, 2F

07/13 01:35, , 3F
期待愛爾蘭再出來攪局吧....
07/13 01:35, 3F

07/14 13:15, , 4F
看來Irish E3會跟HR3012脫勾 http://goo.gl/qvTnp
07/14 13:15, 4F

07/14 14:43, , 5F
如果這樣,就只能期待來不及投票了...
07/14 14:43, 5F

07/14 20:20, , 6F
IV上的這個訊息有點存疑,就算E3過的了Senate也過不了House
07/14 20:20, 6F

07/14 20:21, , 7F
只有綁在一起才有機會,這點Schumer不會不知道的
07/14 20:21, 7F

07/14 20:22, , 8F
除非Schumer只是要做做樣子
07/14 20:22, 8F
文章代碼(AID): #1F_joqa6 (Immigration)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1F_joqa6 (Immigration)