[討論] 關於富堅的畫功
獵人板首PO,請各位不吝賜教
最近正在練習畫漫畫,正好碰上獵人復刊
因此想問此問題 本人絕對無意引戰
獵人的畫功到底好不好,實在不好定論
若從分鏡格來說,富堅絕對是個鬼才
人物在戰鬥的分鏡相當的強
不會像火鳳一樣,太多速度線和人物佔太大的分鏡框
以致於戰鬥雖然精彩,但讀者必須花很多時間去思考
浪客行的戰鬥也很精彩,但也必須花時間思考
但獵人就不同了
獵人的戰鬥分鏡完全不複雜(可能和作者息性有關)
所以可以非常快速的明白目前是誰用什麼方式進攻
再從人物造形來說
富堅的人物塑造得很成功,80到90年代的小孩
應該都知道小傑、奇犽、庫拉皮卡、雷歐力
即使他們根本沒有把獵人完整看完過
但人物的臉形,婉轉一點的說
就像週少SUNDAY那些畫給小學生的漫畫
人物的臉形都是扁長方形的,而且臉上都有高角度的角
難以斷定獵人的人設到底有多成功
再從人物骨架來說
其實富堅就算是丟草稿,他的人物骨架也有一定的精度
可是人物骨架的定義到底是什麼
是指靜態的人物骨架,還是動態的人物骨架
若直接難他的骨架和井上雄彥比,那誰的人物骨架畫得比較好
畫面完成度
.......不需要說明吧
畫面表現力
富堅這畫面表現力這塊也很強
在這裡,他的草稿有時反而可以增強畫面力度
使讀者對劇情的不安定性增加
綜合以上可知
富堅在畫功上,有不少的優點
同時也有很多缺點
所以富堅的畫功到底算不算很強?
(我可以肯定絕對不弱 人物的造形和畫面細緻度可以練
但分鏡和畫面表現力真的非常的難練)
如果很強,那應該是和哪些畫家同一個級別?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.227.183.79
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Hunter/M.1402574636.A.247.html
推
06/12 20:12, , 1F
06/12 20:12, 1F
推
06/12 20:12, , 2F
06/12 20:12, 2F
→
06/12 20:18, , 3F
06/12 20:18, 3F
推
06/12 20:25, , 4F
06/12 20:25, 4F
推
06/12 20:28, , 5F
06/12 20:28, 5F
→
06/12 20:34, , 6F
06/12 20:34, 6F
推
06/12 20:37, , 7F
06/12 20:37, 7F
→
06/12 20:37, , 8F
06/12 20:37, 8F
推
06/12 21:02, , 9F
06/12 21:02, 9F
→
06/12 21:10, , 10F
06/12 21:10, 10F
推
06/12 21:45, , 11F
06/12 21:45, 11F
推
06/12 21:45, , 12F
06/12 21:45, 12F
推
06/12 22:06, , 13F
06/12 22:06, 13F
→
06/12 22:19, , 14F
06/12 22:19, 14F
→
06/12 22:21, , 15F
06/12 22:21, 15F
推
06/12 22:28, , 16F
06/12 22:28, 16F
→
06/12 22:29, , 17F
06/12 22:29, 17F
→
06/12 22:30, , 18F
06/12 22:30, 18F
推
06/12 22:41, , 19F
06/12 22:41, 19F
推
06/12 23:59, , 20F
06/12 23:59, 20F
推
06/13 00:38, , 21F
06/13 00:38, 21F
→
06/13 00:38, , 22F
06/13 00:38, 22F
推
06/13 04:14, , 23F
06/13 04:14, 23F
→
06/13 09:47, , 24F
06/13 09:47, 24F
→
06/13 09:48, , 25F
06/13 09:48, 25F
推
06/13 10:30, , 26F
06/13 10:30, 26F
→
06/13 10:41, , 27F
06/13 10:41, 27F
推
06/13 11:54, , 28F
06/13 11:54, 28F
→
06/13 11:55, , 29F
06/13 11:55, 29F
→
06/13 11:57, , 30F
06/13 11:57, 30F
→
06/13 12:01, , 31F
06/13 12:01, 31F
→
06/13 12:01, , 32F
06/13 12:01, 32F
推
06/13 13:00, , 33F
06/13 13:00, 33F
→
06/13 13:00, , 34F
06/13 13:00, 34F
推
06/13 14:17, , 35F
06/13 14:17, 35F
→
06/13 14:18, , 36F
06/13 14:18, 36F
→
06/13 14:22, , 37F
06/13 14:22, 37F
→
06/13 14:24, , 38F
06/13 14:24, 38F
推
06/13 14:35, , 39F
06/13 14:35, 39F
推
06/13 17:09, , 40F
06/13 17:09, 40F
推
06/13 18:15, , 41F
06/13 18:15, 41F
→
06/13 18:16, , 42F
06/13 18:16, 42F
推
06/13 23:16, , 43F
06/13 23:16, 43F
→
06/13 23:17, , 44F
06/13 23:17, 44F
推
06/13 23:32, , 45F
06/13 23:32, 45F
→
06/13 23:33, , 46F
06/13 23:33, 46F
推
06/14 00:35, , 47F
06/14 00:35, 47F
推
06/14 00:58, , 48F
06/14 00:58, 48F
→
06/14 00:59, , 49F
06/14 00:59, 49F
推
06/14 09:58, , 50F
06/14 09:58, 50F
→
06/14 09:59, , 51F
06/14 09:59, 51F
→
06/14 10:00, , 52F
06/14 10:00, 52F
→
06/14 10:01, , 53F
06/14 10:01, 53F
→
06/14 10:01, , 54F
06/14 10:01, 54F
→
06/14 10:02, , 55F
06/14 10:02, 55F
→
06/14 10:05, , 56F
06/14 10:05, 56F
→
06/14 10:07, , 57F
06/14 10:07, 57F
→
06/14 10:09, , 58F
06/14 10:09, 58F
→
06/14 14:38, , 59F
06/14 14:38, 59F
推
06/15 17:52, , 60F
06/15 17:52, 60F
推
06/15 17:54, , 61F
06/15 17:54, 61F
推
06/15 17:57, , 62F
06/15 17:57, 62F
→
06/15 17:59, , 63F
06/15 17:59, 63F
推
06/15 18:00, , 64F
06/15 18:00, 64F
推
06/15 18:03, , 65F
06/15 18:03, 65F
推
06/15 18:05, , 66F
06/15 18:05, 66F