[討論] 關於席巴的強度??
如題,
假設西索跟伊爾迷實力大約相當的話,
席巴實力應該比西索強,也不見得會打輸團長。
在目前有出現過戰鬥畫面的"人類"當中,
除了會長跟大傑以外,似乎桀諾是最厲害的。
(也有可能是比斯吉)
不過之前也有聽過反面的說法,
認為席巴的實力並不會輸給桀諾。
這種講法可能是要打破"越老越強"的迷思??
因為之前大家都相信會長仍是最強的人類,
這樣看的話能到達 尼特羅、桀諾 境界的就沒幾位了。
反之,如果獵人世界依然遵守"年老力衰"的常態,
那麼強度就還可以重新定位。
像是席巴一下就解決了那隻速度快的貓男(名字忘了),
當初莫老五也是跟它稍微纏鬥了一陣。
莫老五雖然能力不是戰鬥型的,但也是眾所認同的強者。
雖然,會長只能讓王受到輕傷,貓女被大傑爆氣秒掉,
對上尤匹的實力也不差,但缺乏像席巴這種中年(或青年)戰鬥高手。
我指的是Level 差不多像西索、伊爾迷這種腳色,
至於奇犽,我認為他戰力還有發育的空間(應該還打不贏他哥)
拿酷戮(熱血青年)戰力很優,可是他沒有高輸出的傷害技...
或者拚死可以跟對手玉石俱焚那種氣勢的超級大絕。
如果從這個觀點看,個人覺得旅團其實對上護衛軍也不致被慘電,
每個都 年青氣盛適合打架,論"搏鬥"經驗也很難講。
只是飛坦不管是愛玩還是大意,那一刀沒有秒殺女王,
結果還被打到左手斷掉逼開大絕,害旅團被扣了不少分。
感想:
1. 人類還有許多後起之秀、或者尚未展現出實力的,
整體說來人類與 王 or 護衛軍的差距沒有那麼悲劇,
以後演到暗黑大陸差距應該會越來越小~~
2. 不管怎麼看都覺得席巴非常強,完全不會因為
他被團長傷到就斷定 桀諾 > 團長 > 席巴這種說法,
以年紀跟力量全盛期的觀點,檯面上出過手的人類,
可能沒有一個可以確定電爆他的。
---------------個人想法,歡迎討論 or 指正 XD----------------
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.117.70.155
→
09/12 18:06, , 1F
09/12 18:06, 1F
→
09/12 18:41, , 2F
09/12 18:41, 2F
→
09/12 18:42, , 3F
09/12 18:42, 3F
→
09/12 18:43, , 4F
09/12 18:43, 4F
→
09/12 18:44, , 5F
09/12 18:44, 5F
→
09/12 18:45, , 6F
09/12 18:45, 6F
→
09/12 18:45, , 7F
09/12 18:45, 7F
→
09/12 18:46, , 8F
09/12 18:46, 8F
→
09/12 18:47, , 9F
09/12 18:47, 9F
→
09/12 18:48, , 10F
09/12 18:48, 10F
→
09/12 18:51, , 11F
09/12 18:51, 11F
→
09/12 18:51, , 12F
09/12 18:51, 12F
推
09/12 19:41, , 13F
09/12 19:41, 13F
推
09/12 20:08, , 14F
09/12 20:08, 14F
推
09/12 20:31, , 15F
09/12 20:31, 15F
推
09/12 20:43, , 16F
09/12 20:43, 16F
→
09/12 20:44, , 17F
09/12 20:44, 17F
→
09/12 20:45, , 18F
09/12 20:45, 18F
→
09/12 21:03, , 19F
09/12 21:03, 19F
推
09/12 21:04, , 20F
09/12 21:04, 20F
→
09/12 21:07, , 21F
09/12 21:07, 21F
→
09/12 21:09, , 22F
09/12 21:09, 22F
→
09/12 21:11, , 23F
09/12 21:11, 23F
→
09/12 21:12, , 24F
09/12 21:12, 24F
推
09/12 21:51, , 25F
09/12 21:51, 25F
推
09/12 22:45, , 26F
09/12 22:45, 26F
推
09/13 06:54, , 27F
09/13 06:54, 27F
推
09/13 12:40, , 28F
09/13 12:40, 28F
推
09/13 13:01, , 29F
09/13 13:01, 29F
→
09/13 13:02, , 30F
09/13 13:02, 30F
→
09/13 13:03, , 31F
09/13 13:03, 31F
→
09/13 13:03, , 32F
09/13 13:03, 32F
推
09/13 13:53, , 33F
09/13 13:53, 33F
→
09/13 13:55, , 34F
09/13 13:55, 34F
推
09/13 14:01, , 35F
09/13 14:01, 35F
推
09/13 18:41, , 36F
09/13 18:41, 36F
推
09/13 21:54, , 37F
09/13 21:54, 37F
推
09/13 23:20, , 38F
09/13 23:20, 38F
推
09/14 02:13, , 39F
09/14 02:13, 39F
推
09/14 08:26, , 40F
09/14 08:26, 40F
→
09/14 08:27, , 41F
09/14 08:27, 41F
→
09/14 08:28, , 42F
09/14 08:28, 42F
→
09/14 08:29, , 43F
09/14 08:29, 43F
推
09/14 17:22, , 44F
09/14 17:22, 44F
推
09/14 17:38, , 45F
09/14 17:38, 45F
→
09/14 17:39, , 46F
09/14 17:39, 46F
推
09/14 22:48, , 47F
09/14 22:48, 47F
→
09/14 22:50, , 48F
09/14 22:50, 48F
推
09/14 22:53, , 49F
09/14 22:53, 49F
推
09/15 09:45, , 50F
09/15 09:45, 50F
推
09/15 20:22, , 51F
09/15 20:22, 51F
推
09/15 22:14, , 52F
09/15 22:14, 52F
→
09/16 07:26, , 53F
09/16 07:26, 53F
→
09/16 07:27, , 54F
09/16 07:27, 54F
→
09/16 07:31, , 55F
09/16 07:31, 55F
→
09/16 07:42, , 56F
09/16 07:42, 56F
推
09/16 13:22, , 57F
09/16 13:22, 57F
→
09/16 13:27, , 58F
09/16 13:27, 58F
推
09/16 13:34, , 59F
09/16 13:34, 59F
→
09/16 13:35, , 60F
09/16 13:35, 60F
→
09/16 13:36, , 61F
09/16 13:36, 61F
推
09/16 20:32, , 62F
09/16 20:32, 62F
推
09/17 06:11, , 63F
09/17 06:11, 63F
→
09/17 21:25, , 64F
09/17 21:25, 64F
→
09/17 21:26, , 65F
09/17 21:26, 65F
推
09/18 06:42, , 66F
09/18 06:42, 66F
→
09/18 06:43, , 67F
09/18 06:43, 67F
→
09/18 06:44, , 68F
09/18 06:44, 68F
推
09/22 02:43, , 69F
09/22 02:43, 69F
→
09/22 02:44, , 70F
09/22 02:44, 70F
→
09/22 02:45, , 71F
09/22 02:45, 71F
→
09/22 02:46, , 72F
09/22 02:46, 72F
→
09/22 02:48, , 73F
09/22 02:48, 73F
→
09/22 02:49, , 74F
09/22 02:49, 74F
推
09/23 14:53, , 75F
09/23 14:53, 75F
→
09/23 14:59, , 76F
09/23 14:59, 76F
→
09/23 14:59, , 77F
09/23 14:59, 77F
推
06/28 11:57, , 78F
06/28 11:57, 78F