[討論] 如果最後有明確證據,小草會有什麼反應
看板HatePolitics作者NTUST (國立金城武科技大學)時間1年前 (2024/09/11 09:40)推噓76(83推 7噓 128→)留言218則, 126人參與討論串1/3 (看更多)
現在小草的問題
就是有什麼消息丟出來都是一律不信
反正就是司法不公
然後隨便拉一堆無關的案例下水
看到一堆小草說
如果柯文哲也有事
那台灣就沒有能夠相信的政治人物了
如果最後有明確證據
那小草會接受嗎
還是會繼續跳針呢
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.140.182.0 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1726018859.A.3AC.html
→
09/11 09:41,
1年前
, 1F
09/11 09:41, 1F
推
09/11 09:41,
1年前
, 2F
09/11 09:41, 2F
→
09/11 09:41,
1年前
, 3F
09/11 09:41, 3F
推
09/11 09:41,
1年前
, 4F
09/11 09:41, 4F
→
09/11 09:41,
1年前
, 5F
09/11 09:41, 5F
推
09/11 09:41,
1年前
, 6F
09/11 09:41, 6F
推
09/11 09:41,
1年前
, 7F
09/11 09:41, 7F
→
09/11 09:42,
1年前
, 8F
09/11 09:42, 8F
→
09/11 09:42,
1年前
, 9F
09/11 09:42, 9F
→
09/11 09:42,
1年前
, 10F
09/11 09:42, 10F
推
09/11 09:42,
1年前
, 11F
09/11 09:42, 11F
→
09/11 09:42,
1年前
, 12F
09/11 09:42, 12F
→
09/11 09:42,
1年前
, 13F
09/11 09:42, 13F
→
09/11 09:42,
1年前
, 14F
09/11 09:42, 14F
→
09/11 09:42,
1年前
, 15F
09/11 09:42, 15F
→
09/11 09:43,
1年前
, 16F
09/11 09:43, 16F
→
09/11 09:43,
1年前
, 17F
09/11 09:43, 17F
推
09/11 09:43,
1年前
, 18F
09/11 09:43, 18F
→
09/11 09:43,
1年前
, 19F
09/11 09:43, 19F
→
09/11 09:43,
1年前
, 20F
09/11 09:43, 20F
→
09/11 09:43,
1年前
, 21F
09/11 09:43, 21F
推
09/11 09:43,
1年前
, 22F
09/11 09:43, 22F
→
09/11 09:44,
1年前
, 23F
09/11 09:44, 23F
→
09/11 09:44,
1年前
, 24F
09/11 09:44, 24F
→
09/11 09:44,
1年前
, 25F
09/11 09:44, 25F
→
09/11 09:44,
1年前
, 26F
09/11 09:44, 26F
→
09/11 09:44,
1年前
, 27F
09/11 09:44, 27F
→
09/11 09:44,
1年前
, 28F
09/11 09:44, 28F
推
09/11 09:45,
1年前
, 29F
09/11 09:45, 29F
推
09/11 09:45,
1年前
, 30F
09/11 09:45, 30F
→
09/11 09:45,
1年前
, 31F
09/11 09:45, 31F
→
09/11 09:45,
1年前
, 32F
09/11 09:45, 32F
推
09/11 09:45,
1年前
, 33F
09/11 09:45, 33F
→
09/11 09:45,
1年前
, 34F
09/11 09:45, 34F
1.我不是深藍
2.國民黨看起來沒在打柯嗎
→
09/11 09:46,
1年前
, 35F
09/11 09:46, 35F
→
09/11 09:46,
1年前
, 36F
09/11 09:46, 36F
推
09/11 09:47,
1年前
, 37F
09/11 09:47, 37F
推
09/11 09:47,
1年前
, 38F
09/11 09:47, 38F
還有 140 則推文
還有 4 段內文
推
09/11 11:29,
1年前
, 179F
09/11 11:29, 179F
→
09/11 11:30,
1年前
, 180F
09/11 11:30, 180F
→
09/11 11:30,
1年前
, 181F
09/11 11:30, 181F
推
09/11 11:30,
1年前
, 182F
09/11 11:30, 182F
→
09/11 11:30,
1年前
, 183F
09/11 11:30, 183F
推
09/11 11:30,
1年前
, 184F
09/11 11:30, 184F
→
09/11 11:31,
1年前
, 185F
09/11 11:31, 185F
推
09/11 11:33,
1年前
, 186F
09/11 11:33, 186F
→
09/11 11:44,
1年前
, 187F
09/11 11:44, 187F
推
09/11 11:44,
1年前
, 188F
09/11 11:44, 188F
噓
09/11 11:51,
1年前
, 189F
09/11 11:51, 189F
→
09/11 11:51,
1年前
, 190F
09/11 11:51, 190F
推
09/11 12:00,
1年前
, 191F
09/11 12:00, 191F
推
09/11 12:04,
1年前
, 192F
09/11 12:04, 192F
→
09/11 12:04,
1年前
, 193F
09/11 12:04, 193F
推
09/11 12:06,
1年前
, 194F
09/11 12:06, 194F
推
09/11 12:09,
1年前
, 195F
09/11 12:09, 195F
噓
09/11 12:10,
1年前
, 196F
09/11 12:10, 196F
→
09/11 12:10,
1年前
, 197F
09/11 12:10, 197F
→
09/11 12:11,
1年前
, 198F
09/11 12:11, 198F
→
09/11 12:12,
1年前
, 199F
09/11 12:12, 199F
→
09/11 12:13,
1年前
, 200F
09/11 12:13, 200F
推
09/11 12:22,
1年前
, 201F
09/11 12:22, 201F
→
09/11 12:25,
1年前
, 202F
09/11 12:25, 202F
→
09/11 12:26,
1年前
, 203F
09/11 12:26, 203F
→
09/11 12:29,
1年前
, 204F
09/11 12:29, 204F
→
09/11 12:30,
1年前
, 205F
09/11 12:30, 205F
推
09/11 12:35,
1年前
, 206F
09/11 12:35, 206F
推
09/11 12:36,
1年前
, 207F
09/11 12:36, 207F
→
09/11 12:36,
1年前
, 208F
09/11 12:36, 208F
→
09/11 12:40,
1年前
, 209F
09/11 12:40, 209F
推
09/11 13:17,
1年前
, 210F
09/11 13:17, 210F
推
09/11 13:49,
1年前
, 211F
09/11 13:49, 211F
→
09/11 13:49,
1年前
, 212F
09/11 13:49, 212F
→
09/11 13:54,
1年前
, 213F
09/11 13:54, 213F
→
09/11 13:54,
1年前
, 214F
09/11 13:54, 214F
→
09/11 13:55,
1年前
, 215F
09/11 13:55, 215F
推
09/11 13:55,
1年前
, 216F
09/11 13:55, 216F
→
09/11 13:55,
1年前
, 217F
09/11 13:55, 217F
推
09/11 14:04,
1年前
, 218F
09/11 14:04, 218F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):