[討論] 假如今天真的海巡有撞翻人家
要說錄影設備剛好壞掉真的鬼都不信,
而且對方在大陸已經言之鑿鑿了,
到時候檢查船身也會知道到底有沒有撞,
我們假設撞翻致死是事實好了。
大家覺得政府會怎麼做?
1.堅決隱匿事實,就是他們自己翻的。
2.承認事實並道歉,並允諾提供賠償。
3.承認事實但是他們越界在先,雖然遺憾但是沒錯。
4.承認事實,並說未來會加大執法力度。
我覺得會是3,因為2的話實在太軟了,
這樣沒有辦法對那些死忠塔綠斑交代,
但是3的話必定招致對岸的報復,
如這次的登艦檢查可能只是開始而已,
然而我們的政府就是如此的無能,
錯了也不敢承認,然後被報復了也無力還擊。
今天選擇2基本上就可以平息風波,
甚至處理得好還能緩和兩岸關係,
但以党的尿性只會越弄越糟吧?
大家覺得如果是事實,党會怎麼做?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.221.104.175 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1708504420.A.BCC.html
推
02/21 16:35,
3月前
, 1F
02/21 16:35, 1F
→
02/21 16:35,
3月前
, 2F
02/21 16:35, 2F
→
02/21 16:35,
3月前
, 3F
02/21 16:35, 3F
調查好像還沒結果的樣子?可以根據調查結果再選一次~
→
02/21 16:36,
3月前
, 4F
02/21 16:36, 4F
你確定?重疊海域,要這樣講對岸可以做的文章可多了~
→
02/21 16:36,
3月前
, 5F
02/21 16:36, 5F
推
02/21 16:36,
3月前
, 6F
02/21 16:36, 6F
但事實就是那種地方大家平常好來好去的,
你要這樣撞,台灣漁民百分百不會越界?
※ 編輯: louiswei1986 (61.221.104.175 臺灣), 02/21/2024 16:37:21
推
02/21 16:37,
3月前
, 7F
02/21 16:37, 7F
推
02/21 16:37,
3月前
, 8F
02/21 16:37, 8F
→
02/21 16:37,
3月前
, 9F
02/21 16:37, 9F
→
02/21 16:37,
3月前
, 10F
02/21 16:37, 10F
→
02/21 16:37,
3月前
, 11F
02/21 16:37, 11F
→
02/21 16:37,
3月前
, 12F
02/21 16:37, 12F
我支持海巡反擊阿,問題是後面政府能怎麼處理?
不是我不准海巡做事,是政府能提供什麼後盾?
→
02/21 16:37,
3月前
, 13F
02/21 16:37, 13F
→
02/21 16:37,
3月前
, 14F
02/21 16:37, 14F
→
02/21 16:38,
3月前
, 15F
02/21 16:38, 15F
→
02/21 16:38,
3月前
, 16F
02/21 16:38, 16F
拘捕沒問題啊,但現在弄死人了才是問題啊
→
02/21 16:38,
3月前
, 17F
02/21 16:38, 17F
※ 編輯: louiswei1986 (61.221.104.175 臺灣), 02/21/2024 16:39:02
→
02/21 16:38,
3月前
, 18F
02/21 16:38, 18F
→
02/21 16:38,
3月前
, 19F
02/21 16:38, 19F
→
02/21 16:38,
3月前
, 20F
02/21 16:38, 20F
→
02/21 16:38,
3月前
, 21F
02/21 16:38, 21F
→
02/21 16:38,
3月前
, 22F
02/21 16:38, 22F
→
02/21 16:39,
3月前
, 23F
02/21 16:39, 23F
推
02/21 16:40,
3月前
, 24F
02/21 16:40, 24F
→
02/21 16:40,
3月前
, 25F
02/21 16:40, 25F
→
02/21 16:40,
3月前
, 26F
02/21 16:40, 26F
噓
02/21 16:40,
3月前
, 27F
02/21 16:40, 27F
→
02/21 16:40,
3月前
, 28F
02/21 16:40, 28F
→
02/21 16:40,
3月前
, 29F
02/21 16:40, 29F
推
02/21 16:40,
3月前
, 30F
02/21 16:40, 30F
我也覺得如果是撞翻致死,至少就過失致死的部分也該道歉與賠償
→
02/21 16:40,
3月前
, 31F
02/21 16:40, 31F
這種驅離就好了吧?
還有 54 則推文
還有 3 段內文
→
02/21 16:57,
3月前
, 86F
02/21 16:57, 86F
→
02/21 16:57,
3月前
, 87F
02/21 16:57, 87F
→
02/21 16:57,
3月前
, 88F
02/21 16:57, 88F
→
02/21 16:57,
3月前
, 89F
02/21 16:57, 89F
→
02/21 16:57,
3月前
, 90F
02/21 16:57, 90F
→
02/21 16:57,
3月前
, 91F
02/21 16:57, 91F
→
02/21 16:58,
3月前
, 92F
02/21 16:58, 92F
推
02/21 17:00,
3月前
, 93F
02/21 17:00, 93F
推
02/21 17:00,
3月前
, 94F
02/21 17:00, 94F
→
02/21 17:00,
3月前
, 95F
02/21 17:00, 95F
→
02/21 17:00,
3月前
, 96F
02/21 17:00, 96F
→
02/21 17:00,
3月前
, 97F
02/21 17:00, 97F
推
02/21 17:02,
3月前
, 98F
02/21 17:02, 98F
→
02/21 17:02,
3月前
, 99F
02/21 17:02, 99F
噓
02/21 17:03,
3月前
, 100F
02/21 17:03, 100F
→
02/21 17:04,
3月前
, 101F
02/21 17:04, 101F
→
02/21 17:04,
3月前
, 102F
02/21 17:04, 102F
→
02/21 17:05,
3月前
, 103F
02/21 17:05, 103F
推
02/21 17:05,
3月前
, 104F
02/21 17:05, 104F
→
02/21 17:05,
3月前
, 105F
02/21 17:05, 105F
→
02/21 17:06,
3月前
, 106F
02/21 17:06, 106F
→
02/21 17:06,
3月前
, 107F
02/21 17:06, 107F
→
02/21 17:06,
3月前
, 108F
02/21 17:06, 108F
→
02/21 17:07,
3月前
, 109F
02/21 17:07, 109F
→
02/21 17:08,
3月前
, 110F
02/21 17:08, 110F
→
02/21 17:08,
3月前
, 111F
02/21 17:08, 111F
→
02/21 17:09,
3月前
, 112F
02/21 17:09, 112F
推
02/21 17:15,
3月前
, 113F
02/21 17:15, 113F
推
02/21 17:16,
3月前
, 114F
02/21 17:16, 114F
噓
02/21 17:19,
3月前
, 115F
02/21 17:19, 115F
這個事實你現在用什麼證明
※ 編輯: louiswei1986 (60.251.143.43 臺灣), 02/21/2024 17:21:35
→
02/21 18:00,
3月前
, 116F
02/21 18:00, 116F
→
02/21 18:00,
3月前
, 117F
02/21 18:00, 117F
→
02/21 18:00,
3月前
, 118F
02/21 18:00, 118F
→
02/21 18:00,
3月前
, 119F
02/21 18:00, 119F
推
02/21 18:20,
3月前
, 120F
02/21 18:20, 120F
→
02/21 18:20,
3月前
, 121F
02/21 18:20, 121F
噓
02/22 03:05,
3月前
, 122F
02/22 03:05, 122F
→
02/22 03:06,
3月前
, 123F
02/22 03:06, 123F
→
02/22 03:06,
3月前
, 124F
02/22 03:06, 124F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
討論
6
124