Re: [新聞] 高端疫苗報告等一年 為何遲不公布?

看板HatePolitics作者 (明星黯月)時間1年前 (2022/09/10 15:41), 1年前編輯推噓7(706)
留言13則, 9人參與, 1年前最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
: 噓 ottoo: 還在問保護力的智商是有問題嗎?我就問莫得納還是bnt保護力 09/10 13:36 : → ottoo: 是多少?有當初說的90以上嗎? 09/10 13:36 保護力不只是確診的保護力,還有住院甚至重症死亡的保護力, 雖然不是隨機分派對照實驗,但新加坡最近發布了一個omicron期間BNT孩童保護力報告 Effectiveness of BNT162b2 Vaccine against Omicron in Children 5 to 11 Years of Age https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2203209 Among partially vaccinated children, vaccine effectiveness was 13.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.7 to 15.5) against all SARS-CoV-2 infections, 24.3% (95% CI, 19.5 to 28.9) against PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 42.3% (95% CI, 24.9 to 55.7) against Covid-19–related hospitalization; in fully vaccinated children, vaccine effectiveness was 36.8% (95% CI, 35.3 to 38.2), 65.3% (95% CI, 62.0 to 68.3), and 82.7% (95% CI, 74.8 to 88.2), respectively. 完整接種BNT疫苗的孩童,通報感染保護力36.8%,PCR確診保護力65.3%, 住院保護力82.7% 就不知道高端的這幾項保護力分別是多少? 幾個月前英國也有一篇omicron流行期間real world數據分析 Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2119451 vaccine effectiveness after two BNT162b2 doses was 65.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63.9 to 67.0) at 2 to 4 weeks, dropping to 8.8% (95% CI, 7.0 to 10.5) at 25 or more weeks. Among ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 primary course recipients, vaccine effectiveness increased to 62.4% (95% CI, 61.8 to 63.0) at 2 to 4 weeks after a BNT162b2 booster before decreasing to 39.6% (95% CI, 38.0 to 41.1) at 10 or more weeks. Among BNT162b2 primary course recipients, vaccine effectiveness increased to 67.2% (95% CI, 66.5 to 67.8) at 2 to 4 weeks after a BNT162b2 booster before declining to 45.7% (95% CI, 44.7 to 46.7) at 10 or more weeks. Vaccine effectiveness after a ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 primary course increased to 70.1% (95% CI, 69.5 to 70.7) at 2 to 4 weeks after an mRNA-1273 booster and decreased to 60.9% (95% CI, 59.7 to 62.1) at 5 to 9 weeks. After a BNT162b2 primary course, the mRNA-1273 booster increased vaccine effectiveness to 73.9% (95% CI, 73.1 to 74.6) at 2 to 4 weeks; vaccine effectiveness fell to 64.4% (95% CI, 62.6 to 66.1) at 5 to 9 weeks. 3劑BNT打完2-4周保護力67.2%,10周後保護力還有45.7% 台灣疾管署手上握有全民新冠疫苗接種資料,也有全民確診通報資料, 如果有心分析的話,應該也能統計出高端的保護力數據 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.249.212.201 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1662795711.A.CA4.html

09/10 15:46, 1年前 , 1F
本文違反數位中介法,已被刪除。
09/10 15:46, 1F

09/10 15:48, 1年前 , 2F
問就是機密三十年
09/10 15:48, 2F

09/10 15:52, 1年前 , 3F
數字好看 早就公布吹翻啦
09/10 15:52, 3F

09/10 15:54, 1年前 , 4F
其他幾個疫苗對o保護力都那麼差 高端想當然不會太好
09/10 15:54, 4F

09/10 15:55, 1年前 , 5F
反正沒公布就不會被打臉
09/10 15:55, 5F

09/10 15:56, 1年前 , 6F
每次問高端的保護力就沒幾個推文,哈哈,死忠仔都不知
09/10 15:56, 6F

09/10 15:56, 1年前 , 7F
道怎麼護航了吧
09/10 15:56, 7F

09/10 16:08, 1年前 , 8F
啊狼勒? 不用扯BNT你高端保護力報告是寫在標案裡要交
09/10 16:08, 8F

09/10 16:08, 1年前 , 9F
的 我們就來看衛福部誰敢簽名驗收
09/10 16:08, 9F
※ 編輯: moondark92 (111.249.212.201 臺灣), 09/10/2022 16:23:16

09/10 17:58, 1年前 , 10F
值得討論的都是被低調的
09/10 17:58, 10F

09/10 18:15, 1年前 , 11F
封存就不需要知道
09/10 18:15, 11F

09/10 18:36, 1年前 , 12F
現在常見的護航變成病毒變太多保護力沒意義了各牌都差
09/10 18:36, 12F

09/10 18:39, 1年前 , 13F
當初一直強調扶植國產技術很重要 結果檢視都不給人檢視
09/10 18:39, 13F
文章代碼(AID): #1Z73-_oa (HatePolitics)
文章代碼(AID): #1Z73-_oa (HatePolitics)