[討論] 拔管效應-關於王威中議員與dpp們消失
先說我認為王議員是還ok的,至少不至於整天在那邊胡說八道,但就拔管案
包含+ <><議員在內,都犯了一個很嚴重的錯誤,只是因為他們是地方議員層級
選民還不至於把火往他們身上燒.....
王議員在28日的政論節目提到他自已都嚇一下,認為台北市選民的教育程度較
高,應該會有能力分析判別,怎麼會美麗島電子民調出來,台北市民有這樣大
的比例認為拔管是錯誤的,感到非常錯愕,接著開始提到自已也是台大的,
以前國民黨如何等等... + <><議員講到管案,也是提到自已是台大的,以前
kmt怎樣如何,所以管不適任等等..
今天你不喜歡管、他不喜歡管,可能獨眼龍也不喜歡管,但是他就是好運啊,賽局
的偶然、命運的巧合,被管給選上了,然後你們DPP全黨上下也拿不出一個明確的法
條來說明你們擋他的法源根據,硬是不發聘書,結果妳們眼中以為會跟你們站在一起的
所謂教育程度較高的知識分子反不跟你們站在一起,天生反骨的台大教授們過半也不跟
你們站在一起,正是因為他們有在思辯,思辯的是程序正議,法律的明確性,人家想的
是合不合法,想的是白紙黑字的法條依據,結果你們DPP想的是適不適任,想的是KMT遺毒
這一類主觀認定的層級,這樣的鴻溝,結果就是弄掉了自已兩任部長,還是解決不了這個
問題,台大一定會跟你訴訟一路打下去,每次有新的變進展,新聞一定又跑去問柯P,柯P
一定還是回你拔管爭議大,訴訟未定之前,你們DPP在教育部這個戰場就永無寧日,民意
是不是反對你們拔管,反的是你們不"照品照行",選輸翻桌的鴨霸行為。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.200.58.147
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1527601656.A.EA5.html
推
05/29 21:50, , 1F
05/29 21:50, 1F
推
05/29 21:50, , 2F
05/29 21:50, 2F
推
05/29 21:51, , 3F
05/29 21:51, 3F
推
05/29 21:51, , 4F
05/29 21:51, 4F
→
05/29 21:52, , 5F
05/29 21:52, 5F
推
05/29 21:52, , 6F
05/29 21:52, 6F
→
05/29 21:52, , 7F
05/29 21:52, 7F
→
05/29 21:52, , 8F
05/29 21:52, 8F
→
05/29 21:52, , 9F
05/29 21:52, 9F
→
05/29 21:54, , 10F
05/29 21:54, 10F
推
05/29 21:54, , 11F
05/29 21:54, 11F
推
05/29 21:54, , 12F
05/29 21:54, 12F
→
05/29 21:54, , 13F
05/29 21:54, 13F
推
05/29 21:55, , 14F
05/29 21:55, 14F
→
05/29 21:55, , 15F
05/29 21:55, 15F
→
05/29 21:56, , 16F
05/29 21:56, 16F
推
05/29 21:56, , 17F
05/29 21:56, 17F
→
05/29 21:57, , 18F
05/29 21:57, 18F
→
05/29 21:57, , 19F
05/29 21:57, 19F
→
05/29 21:57, , 20F
05/29 21:57, 20F
推
05/29 21:58, , 21F
05/29 21:58, 21F
→
05/29 21:58, , 22F
05/29 21:58, 22F
→
05/29 21:58, , 23F
05/29 21:58, 23F
→
05/29 21:59, , 24F
05/29 21:59, 24F
→
05/29 21:59, , 25F
05/29 21:59, 25F
推
05/29 21:59, , 26F
05/29 21:59, 26F
→
05/29 22:00, , 27F
05/29 22:00, 27F
→
05/29 22:00, , 28F
05/29 22:00, 28F
→
05/29 22:00, , 29F
05/29 22:00, 29F
→
05/29 22:00, , 30F
05/29 22:00, 30F
→
05/29 22:01, , 31F
05/29 22:01, 31F
→
05/29 22:02, , 32F
05/29 22:02, 32F
→
05/29 22:02, , 33F
05/29 22:02, 33F
→
05/29 22:03, , 34F
05/29 22:03, 34F
→
05/29 22:03, , 35F
05/29 22:03, 35F
→
05/29 22:03, , 36F
05/29 22:03, 36F
→
05/29 22:03, , 37F
05/29 22:03, 37F
→
05/29 22:03, , 38F
05/29 22:03, 38F
→
05/29 22:04, , 39F
05/29 22:04, 39F
→
05/29 22:04, , 40F
05/29 22:04, 40F
→
05/29 22:04, , 41F
05/29 22:04, 41F
→
05/29 22:05, , 42F
05/29 22:05, 42F
→
05/29 22:05, , 43F
05/29 22:05, 43F
→
05/29 22:05, , 44F
05/29 22:05, 44F
→
05/29 22:06, , 45F
05/29 22:06, 45F
→
05/29 22:06, , 46F
05/29 22:06, 46F
→
05/29 22:06, , 47F
05/29 22:06, 47F
推
05/29 22:06, , 48F
05/29 22:06, 48F
→
05/29 22:06, , 49F
05/29 22:06, 49F
→
05/29 22:06, , 50F
05/29 22:06, 50F
→
05/29 22:07, , 51F
05/29 22:07, 51F
推
05/29 22:07, , 52F
05/29 22:07, 52F
→
05/29 22:07, , 53F
05/29 22:07, 53F
→
05/29 22:07, , 54F
05/29 22:07, 54F
→
05/29 22:07, , 55F
05/29 22:07, 55F
推
05/29 22:07, , 56F
05/29 22:07, 56F
→
05/29 22:07, , 57F
05/29 22:07, 57F
→
05/29 22:07, , 58F
05/29 22:07, 58F
→
05/29 22:07, , 59F
05/29 22:07, 59F
→
05/29 22:08, , 60F
05/29 22:08, 60F
→
05/29 22:08, , 61F
05/29 22:08, 61F
→
05/29 22:08, , 62F
05/29 22:08, 62F
→
05/29 22:09, , 63F
05/29 22:09, 63F
→
05/29 22:09, , 64F
05/29 22:09, 64F
→
05/29 22:09, , 65F
05/29 22:09, 65F
→
05/29 22:09, , 66F
05/29 22:09, 66F
推
05/29 22:11, , 67F
05/29 22:11, 67F
推
05/29 22:11, , 68F
05/29 22:11, 68F
噓
05/29 22:11, , 69F
05/29 22:11, 69F
→
05/29 22:11, , 70F
05/29 22:11, 70F
→
05/29 22:11, , 71F
05/29 22:11, 71F
→
05/29 22:11, , 72F
05/29 22:11, 72F
→
05/29 22:11, , 73F
05/29 22:11, 73F
→
05/29 22:12, , 74F
05/29 22:12, 74F
→
05/29 22:12, , 75F
05/29 22:12, 75F
→
05/29 22:13, , 76F
05/29 22:13, 76F
→
05/29 22:13, , 77F
05/29 22:13, 77F
→
05/29 22:15, , 78F
05/29 22:15, 78F
→
05/29 22:16, , 79F
05/29 22:16, 79F
推
05/29 22:31, , 80F
05/29 22:31, 80F
→
05/29 22:32, , 81F
05/29 22:32, 81F
推
05/29 22:37, , 82F
05/29 22:37, 82F
推
05/29 22:45, , 83F
05/29 22:45, 83F
推
05/29 23:37, , 84F
05/29 23:37, 84F
→
05/29 23:37, , 85F
05/29 23:37, 85F
→
05/29 23:59, , 86F
05/29 23:59, 86F
→
05/30 00:00, , 87F
05/30 00:00, 87F
→
05/30 00:01, , 88F
05/30 00:01, 88F
→
05/30 00:02, , 89F
05/30 00:02, 89F
→
05/30 00:04, , 90F
05/30 00:04, 90F
→
05/30 00:05, , 91F
05/30 00:05, 91F
推
05/30 09:15, , 92F
05/30 09:15, 92F
推
05/30 09:19, , 93F
05/30 09:19, 93F
→
05/30 09:19, , 94F
05/30 09:19, 94F
→
05/30 09:19, , 95F
05/30 09:19, 95F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):