[討論] 要是柯丁對決,柯文哲輸了?消失
1998年台北市長選舉,市政滿意度70%的阿扁輸給了當時老李全力支持的馬邦伯,顯示當時族群政治仍然控制當時選舉政治的大局面。
如今二十年過去,市政滿意度50%的柯P對上藍營過往棄將丁丁一枚,別說柯粉人多勢眾,其中大多也不是台北市民,當今社會仇蔡仇綠是主流,而柯P最緊密政壇盟友正是蔡英文。
柯若無蔡,市政施展難獲中央支持,藍營必會針對此痛處攻擊柯文哲,令淺藍選民回歸,對柯而言這場選戰遠比2014難打。
如果柯P在兩強對決情勢下輸掉選戰,所謂白色力量將會不復存在?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 59.124.157.80
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1525251963.A.F15.html
→
05/02 17:06, , 1F
05/02 17:06, 1F
→
05/02 17:06, , 2F
05/02 17:06, 2F
→
05/02 17:07, , 3F
05/02 17:07, 3F
推
05/02 17:07, , 4F
05/02 17:07, 4F
→
05/02 17:07, , 5F
05/02 17:07, 5F
推
05/02 17:07, , 6F
05/02 17:07, 6F
推
05/02 17:07, , 7F
05/02 17:07, 7F
→
05/02 17:09, , 8F
05/02 17:09, 8F
推
05/02 17:09, , 9F
05/02 17:09, 9F
推
05/02 17:09, , 10F
05/02 17:09, 10F
→
05/02 17:09, , 11F
05/02 17:09, 11F
→
05/02 17:10, , 12F
05/02 17:10, 12F
→
05/02 17:10, , 13F
05/02 17:10, 13F
→
05/02 17:11, , 14F
05/02 17:11, 14F
→
05/02 17:11, , 15F
05/02 17:11, 15F
推
05/02 17:11, , 16F
05/02 17:11, 16F
→
05/02 17:11, , 17F
05/02 17:11, 17F
推
05/02 17:12, , 18F
05/02 17:12, 18F
→
05/02 17:13, , 19F
05/02 17:13, 19F
推
05/02 17:13, , 20F
05/02 17:13, 20F
→
05/02 17:13, , 21F
05/02 17:13, 21F
推
05/02 17:13, , 22F
05/02 17:13, 22F
→
05/02 17:13, , 23F
05/02 17:13, 23F
→
05/02 17:13, , 24F
05/02 17:13, 24F
→
05/02 17:13, , 25F
05/02 17:13, 25F
推
05/02 17:15, , 26F
05/02 17:15, 26F
→
05/02 17:16, , 27F
05/02 17:16, 27F
→
05/02 17:18, , 28F
05/02 17:18, 28F
→
05/02 17:18, , 29F
05/02 17:18, 29F
→
05/02 17:18, , 30F
05/02 17:18, 30F
→
05/02 17:18, , 31F
05/02 17:18, 31F
→
05/02 17:18, , 32F
05/02 17:18, 32F
推
05/02 17:18, , 33F
05/02 17:18, 33F
→
05/02 17:18, , 34F
05/02 17:18, 34F
推
05/02 17:22, , 35F
05/02 17:22, 35F
推
05/02 17:23, , 36F
05/02 17:23, 36F
→
05/02 17:25, , 37F
05/02 17:25, 37F
推
05/02 17:25, , 38F
05/02 17:25, 38F
→
05/02 17:25, , 39F
05/02 17:25, 39F
推
05/02 17:26, , 40F
05/02 17:26, 40F
推
05/02 17:26, , 41F
05/02 17:26, 41F
推
05/02 17:38, , 42F
05/02 17:38, 42F
推
05/02 17:39, , 43F
05/02 17:39, 43F
→
05/02 17:42, , 44F
05/02 17:42, 44F
→
05/02 17:42, , 45F
05/02 17:42, 45F
推
05/02 17:48, , 46F
05/02 17:48, 46F
推
05/02 17:51, , 47F
05/02 17:51, 47F
→
05/02 17:52, , 48F
05/02 17:52, 48F
→
05/02 17:52, , 49F
05/02 17:52, 49F
→
05/02 17:53, , 50F
05/02 17:53, 50F
→
05/02 17:53, , 51F
05/02 17:53, 51F
→
05/02 17:54, , 52F
05/02 17:54, 52F
→
05/02 17:54, , 53F
05/02 17:54, 53F
→
05/02 17:54, , 54F
05/02 17:54, 54F
→
05/02 17:55, , 55F
05/02 17:55, 55F
→
05/02 17:56, , 56F
05/02 17:56, 56F
→
05/02 17:56, , 57F
05/02 17:56, 57F
→
05/02 17:59, , 58F
05/02 17:59, 58F
→
05/02 18:01, , 59F
05/02 18:01, 59F
→
05/02 18:01, , 60F
05/02 18:01, 60F
→
05/02 18:04, , 61F
05/02 18:04, 61F
→
05/02 18:04, , 62F
05/02 18:04, 62F
→
05/02 18:15, , 63F
05/02 18:15, 63F
→
05/02 18:15, , 64F
05/02 18:15, 64F
→
05/02 18:16, , 65F
05/02 18:16, 65F
→
05/02 18:18, , 66F
05/02 18:18, 66F
推
05/02 18:29, , 67F
05/02 18:29, 67F
推
05/02 18:40, , 68F
05/02 18:40, 68F
→
05/02 18:42, , 69F
05/02 18:42, 69F
推
05/02 18:46, , 70F
05/02 18:46, 70F
→
05/02 18:47, , 71F
05/02 18:47, 71F
→
05/02 18:48, , 72F
05/02 18:48, 72F
推
05/02 18:50, , 73F
05/02 18:50, 73F
→
05/02 19:19, , 74F
05/02 19:19, 74F
→
05/02 19:20, , 75F
05/02 19:20, 75F
→
05/02 19:21, , 76F
05/02 19:21, 76F
推
05/02 19:28, , 77F
05/02 19:28, 77F
推
05/02 19:33, , 78F
05/02 19:33, 78F
推
05/02 20:11, , 79F
05/02 20:11, 79F
推
05/02 20:39, , 80F
05/02 20:39, 80F
→
05/02 20:39, , 81F
05/02 20:39, 81F
討論串 (同標題文章)