Re: [討論] 時力在自殺嗎?消失
※ 引述《a10141013 (FlyBall)》之銘言:
: ※ 引述《sunyeah ( 湯元嗎)》之銘言:
: : 假設dpp讓柯 所以時力推人 深綠獨派真的投給時力的人包含議員
: : 這時力眼前這顆獨藥真的要吞嗎?
: : 先不論雙北到底有多少張票這麼厲害讓徐先生流口水念念不忘自推人
: : 這些人只要到時宗主黨大喊一聲歸隊囉 時力不就馬上變....台聯嗎? XD
: 民進黨怕柯粉
: 是因為上次有讓過
: 這次被當應該
: 不讓反而柯粉會一直挑戰民進黨
: 時代又沒有這種問題
: 反正時代不欠柯什麼
: 而且縣市議員沒有找母雞帶
: 你以為選的上?
: 縣市長就是母雞
: 只要縣市長拉高票
: 下面的縣市議員就能多上幾席
: 對時代是百利而無一害
這說法有個小問題
時力若雙北支持度如徐永明所說15%穩升中
真有這樣的支持率
在時力策略一區一席
即便北市不推市長 也該是五席全上
又何須試圖引發母雞帶小雞的效應
來拉抬選情?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 115.82.48.196
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1519137709.A.D98.html
※ 編輯: evangelew (115.82.48.196), 02/20/2018 22:46:08
推
02/20 22:46, , 1F
02/20 22:46, 1F
→
02/20 22:46, , 2F
02/20 22:46, 2F
那是因為國民黨提名策略並不是一區一席
因此需要母雞拉抬小雞...
※ 編輯: evangelew (115.82.48.196), 02/20/2018 22:47:50
推
02/20 22:47, , 3F
02/20 22:47, 3F
→
02/20 22:47, , 4F
02/20 22:47, 4F
推
02/20 22:48, , 5F
02/20 22:48, 5F
→
02/20 22:50, , 6F
02/20 22:50, 6F
推
02/20 22:51, , 7F
02/20 22:51, 7F
→
02/20 22:51, , 8F
02/20 22:51, 8F
推
02/20 22:52, , 9F
02/20 22:52, 9F
→
02/20 22:52, , 10F
02/20 22:52, 10F
對了 我先題外話聲明一下
我也是支持時代力量推出台北市市長人選
這不是反串
※ 編輯: evangelew (115.82.48.196), 02/20/2018 22:54:45
推
02/20 22:58, , 11F
02/20 22:58, 11F
→
02/20 22:58, , 12F
02/20 22:58, 12F
推
02/20 23:08, , 13F
02/20 23:08, 13F
推
02/20 23:10, , 14F
02/20 23:10, 14F
→
02/20 23:11, , 15F
02/20 23:11, 15F
→
02/20 23:12, , 16F
02/20 23:12, 16F
徐永明這樣玩 我怎麼覺得這是在搞肥迪xd
※ 編輯: evangelew (115.82.48.196), 02/20/2018 23:13:35
→
02/20 23:12, , 17F
02/20 23:12, 17F
→
02/20 23:13, , 18F
02/20 23:13, 18F
→
02/20 23:13, , 19F
02/20 23:13, 19F
→
02/20 23:15, , 20F
02/20 23:15, 20F
→
02/20 23:15, , 21F
02/20 23:15, 21F
→
02/20 23:16, , 22F
02/20 23:16, 22F
推
02/20 23:19, , 23F
02/20 23:19, 23F
推
02/20 23:20, , 24F
02/20 23:20, 24F
推
02/20 23:41, , 25F
02/20 23:41, 25F
→
02/20 23:42, , 26F
02/20 23:42, 26F
→
02/20 23:46, , 27F
02/20 23:46, 27F
推
02/20 23:46, , 28F
02/20 23:46, 28F
推
02/20 23:47, , 29F
02/20 23:47, 29F
推
02/20 23:47, , 30F
02/20 23:47, 30F
→
02/20 23:48, , 31F
02/20 23:48, 31F
→
02/20 23:48, , 32F
02/20 23:48, 32F
→
02/20 23:49, , 33F
02/20 23:49, 33F
→
02/20 23:50, , 34F
02/20 23:50, 34F
→
02/20 23:51, , 35F
02/20 23:51, 35F
→
02/20 23:52, , 36F
02/20 23:52, 36F
還有 59 則推文
→
02/21 00:26, , 96F
02/21 00:26, 96F
推
02/21 00:26, , 97F
02/21 00:26, 97F
→
02/21 00:28, , 98F
02/21 00:28, 98F
→
02/21 00:28, , 99F
02/21 00:28, 99F
推
02/21 00:28, , 100F
02/21 00:28, 100F
→
02/21 00:29, , 101F
02/21 00:29, 101F
→
02/21 00:29, , 102F
02/21 00:29, 102F
→
02/21 00:30, , 103F
02/21 00:30, 103F
推
02/21 00:30, , 104F
02/21 00:30, 104F
推
02/21 00:32, , 105F
02/21 00:32, 105F
→
02/21 00:33, , 106F
02/21 00:33, 106F
→
02/21 00:33, , 107F
02/21 00:33, 107F
→
02/21 00:34, , 108F
02/21 00:34, 108F
推
02/21 00:35, , 109F
02/21 00:35, 109F
→
02/21 00:35, , 110F
02/21 00:35, 110F
→
02/21 00:35, , 111F
02/21 00:35, 111F
→
02/21 00:36, , 112F
02/21 00:36, 112F
→
02/21 00:37, , 113F
02/21 00:37, 113F
→
02/21 00:38, , 114F
02/21 00:38, 114F
→
02/21 00:39, , 115F
02/21 00:39, 115F
→
02/21 00:39, , 116F
02/21 00:39, 116F
推
02/21 00:46, , 117F
02/21 00:46, 117F
→
02/21 00:46, , 118F
02/21 00:46, 118F
→
02/21 00:47, , 119F
02/21 00:47, 119F
→
02/21 00:47, , 120F
02/21 00:47, 120F
→
02/21 00:47, , 121F
02/21 00:47, 121F
→
02/21 00:48, , 122F
02/21 00:48, 122F
→
02/21 00:48, , 123F
02/21 00:48, 123F
→
02/21 00:49, , 124F
02/21 00:49, 124F
推
02/21 01:02, , 125F
02/21 01:02, 125F
→
02/21 01:05, , 126F
02/21 01:05, 126F
→
02/21 01:06, , 127F
02/21 01:06, 127F
推
02/21 05:00, , 128F
02/21 05:00, 128F
噓
02/21 08:22, , 129F
02/21 08:22, 129F
噓
02/21 08:26, , 130F
02/21 08:26, 130F
推
02/21 09:59, , 131F
02/21 09:59, 131F
→
02/21 09:59, , 132F
02/21 09:59, 132F
推
02/21 10:47, , 133F
02/21 10:47, 133F
→
02/21 10:47, , 134F
02/21 10:47, 134F
推
02/21 23:26, , 135F
02/21 23:26, 135F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
討論
11
28
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 6 篇):
討論
9
35
討論
23
106
討論
11
28
討論
39
135
討論
8
28