[討論] 到底為什不能接受92共識消失
92共識就是一個中國
一個中國是哪一國 就是中華人民共和國呀
那中華民國是什麼? 當然是流亡政府呀
這不是小英一貫的中國政策嗎?
到底哪裡不能接受了?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.184.39.95
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1473605220.A.68A.html
噓
09/11 22:53, , 1F
09/11 22:53, 1F
→
09/11 22:53, , 2F
09/11 22:53, 2F
→
09/11 22:53, , 3F
09/11 22:53, 3F
我們是流亡政府 屬暫時分裂狀態 所以可以不是prc
噓
09/11 22:56, , 4F
09/11 22:56, 4F
中華民國流亡政府的人民
噓
09/11 22:56, , 5F
09/11 22:56, 5F
噓
09/11 22:56, , 6F
09/11 22:56, 6F
從暫時狀態 可以選統一或獨立
→
09/11 22:57, , 7F
09/11 22:57, 7F
現實就是流亡政府
→
09/11 22:57, , 8F
09/11 22:57, 8F
就請蔡總統正名我們是一中一台
推
09/11 22:59, , 9F
09/11 22:59, 9F
→
09/11 22:59, , 10F
09/11 22:59, 10F
洪承認92只是不要各表
→
09/11 23:00, , 11F
09/11 23:00, 11F
噓
09/11 23:01, , 12F
09/11 23:01, 12F
→
09/11 23:01, , 13F
09/11 23:01, 13F
→
09/11 23:01, , 14F
09/11 23:01, 14F
不承認可以避免?
噓
09/11 23:02, , 15F
09/11 23:02, 15F
其實現狀主權沒差 只是兩岸交流能不能順利而已
→
09/11 23:02, , 16F
09/11 23:02, 16F
噓
09/11 23:02, , 17F
09/11 23:02, 17F
美國也承認一中呀 哪裡不存在?
→
09/11 23:04, , 18F
09/11 23:04, 18F
→
09/11 23:04, , 19F
09/11 23:04, 19F
有差嗎 小英承認美國的 要跟你中共說嗎?
推
09/11 23:05, , 20F
09/11 23:05, 20F
→
09/11 23:05, , 21F
09/11 23:05, 21F
如果承認92後還無法順利交流 那我就認為錯是支那
→
09/11 23:05, , 22F
09/11 23:05, 22F
噓
09/11 23:05, , 23F
09/11 23:05, 23F
→
09/11 23:05, , 24F
09/11 23:05, 24F
你以為美國怎麼獨立的 想太多
→
09/11 23:06, , 25F
09/11 23:06, 25F
那是韓國團體 關交流什麼事?
→
09/11 23:07, , 26F
09/11 23:07, 26F
還有 25 則推文
還有 10 段內文
推
09/11 23:18, , 52F
09/11 23:18, 52F
→
09/11 23:19, , 53F
09/11 23:19, 53F
噓
09/11 23:29, , 54F
09/11 23:29, 54F
推
09/11 23:47, , 55F
09/11 23:47, 55F
→
09/11 23:48, , 56F
09/11 23:48, 56F
噓
09/11 23:49, , 57F
09/11 23:49, 57F
→
09/11 23:56, , 58F
09/11 23:56, 58F
就是「一個中國」
→
09/11 23:57, , 59F
09/11 23:57, 59F
→
09/11 23:58, , 60F
09/11 23:58, 60F
→
09/11 23:58, , 61F
09/11 23:58, 61F
推
09/11 23:58, , 62F
09/11 23:58, 62F
我看起來不認真?
※ 編輯: dakkk (111.184.39.95), 09/11/2016 23:59:53
→
09/11 23:59, , 63F
09/11 23:59, 63F
→
09/12 00:00, , 64F
09/12 00:00, 64F
→
09/12 00:03, , 65F
09/12 00:03, 65F
→
09/12 00:10, , 66F
09/12 00:10, 66F
→
09/12 00:11, , 67F
09/12 00:11, 67F
噓
09/12 00:29, , 68F
09/12 00:29, 68F
噓
09/12 01:02, , 69F
09/12 01:02, 69F
→
09/12 03:21, , 70F
09/12 03:21, 70F
→
09/12 03:21, , 71F
09/12 03:21, 71F
噓
09/12 04:55, , 72F
09/12 04:55, 72F
噓
09/12 08:32, , 73F
09/12 08:32, 73F
噓
09/12 08:42, , 74F
09/12 08:42, 74F
噓
09/12 08:44, , 75F
09/12 08:44, 75F
推
09/12 09:14, , 76F
09/12 09:14, 76F
→
09/12 09:14, , 77F
09/12 09:14, 77F
噓
09/12 09:19, , 78F
09/12 09:19, 78F
推
09/12 10:03, , 79F
09/12 10:03, 79F
推
09/12 11:50, , 80F
09/12 11:50, 80F
→
09/12 12:47, , 81F
09/12 12:47, 81F
噓
09/12 14:35, , 82F
09/12 14:35, 82F
噓
09/12 15:06, , 83F
09/12 15:06, 83F
噓
09/12 15:18, , 84F
09/12 15:18, 84F
噓
09/12 15:32, , 85F
09/12 15:32, 85F
噓
09/12 18:09, , 86F
09/12 18:09, 86F
→
09/13 11:25, , 87F
09/13 11:25, 87F
噓
09/13 12:40, , 88F
09/13 12:40, 88F
→
09/13 12:41, , 89F
09/13 12:41, 89F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 16 篇):