[討論] 洪素珠事件,KMT跟DPP攻防,KMT敗的很慘消失
這陣子KMT與DPP的攻防,DPP真的做的太漂亮了,KMT敗的真的慘
1.事件發生
2.大量媒體炒作此事件 + 外省派藝人們也跟大量炒作事件
3.KMT期待塑造出「千錯萬錯是DPP跟小英的錯」的氛圍
4.結果小英很大氣的率先轉貼柱柱姐的臉書
5.柱柱姐團隊先吃了一驚,想說「幹,來這招」,於是思考要如何應付。
6.該團隊的結論:
再丟反歧視法,到時你們DPP一定會擋,這樣就可以再次把洪素珠事件
的責任算在小英頭上,可以罵DPP說「看吧,早知道你們DPP是玩假的」。
7.該團隊針對小英的轉貼做出第六點的要求
8.結果總統府竟又再更大氣的說「全力支持反歧視法,請國民黨儘快提出內容」。
重重的反將柱柱姐團隊一軍
9.柱柱姐團隊:幹,那接下來要怎麼辦
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.73.36.98
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1465643839.A.D86.html
※ 編輯: adm123 (42.73.36.98), 06/11/2016 19:17:35
※ 編輯: adm123 (42.73.36.98), 06/11/2016 19:18:20
推
06/11 19:19, , 1F
06/11 19:19, 1F
→
06/11 19:19, , 2F
06/11 19:19, 2F
推
06/11 19:19, , 3F
06/11 19:19, 3F
推
06/11 19:20, , 4F
06/11 19:20, 4F
→
06/11 19:20, , 5F
06/11 19:20, 5F
→
06/11 19:20, , 6F
06/11 19:20, 6F
推
06/11 19:20, , 7F
06/11 19:20, 7F
噓
06/11 19:21, , 8F
06/11 19:21, 8F
小英就是一直接球,你是從那一點認為這是在踢皮球?
另外國民黨說為要解決這問題是要定法令,那國民黨肯定知道這法令怎麼定啊,
那不是國民黨定是誰定?
噓
06/11 19:21, , 9F
06/11 19:21, 9F
※ 編輯: adm123 (42.73.36.98), 06/11/2016 19:23:31
噓
06/11 19:23, , 10F
06/11 19:23, 10F
→
06/11 19:23, , 11F
06/11 19:23, 11F
那擬法好了嗎?拿出來啊
然後以後舉一個牌子「釣魚台是日本」的在路上示威,到時眷村老榮民
看到牌子被激到亂罵人「皇民」,被關進牢裡,外省族群就不要靠北喔
人家可以舉「釣魚台是日本」、「是日治不是日據」、「沖之鳥是島」等等
牌子,到時那些眷村老榮民被激到亂罵人「皇民」,請他們自己負起法律責任喔。科科
※ 編輯: adm123 (42.73.36.98), 06/11/2016 19:25:21
→
06/11 19:24, , 12F
06/11 19:24, 12F
推
06/11 19:24, , 13F
06/11 19:24, 13F
推
06/11 19:25, , 14F
06/11 19:25, 14F
推
06/11 19:25, , 15F
06/11 19:25, 15F
※ 編輯: adm123 (42.73.36.98), 06/11/2016 19:27:24
→
06/11 19:25, , 16F
06/11 19:25, 16F
→
06/11 19:25, , 17F
06/11 19:25, 17F
→
06/11 19:26, , 18F
06/11 19:26, 18F
→
06/11 19:26, , 19F
06/11 19:26, 19F
→
06/11 19:26, , 20F
06/11 19:26, 20F
→
06/11 19:27, , 21F
06/11 19:27, 21F
那就叫國民黨快點拿出來啊。我就來看看他如何避免我在推文講的例子。呵呵
推
06/11 19:27, , 22F
06/11 19:27, 22F
※ 編輯: adm123 (42.73.36.98), 06/11/2016 19:28:10
推
06/11 19:27, , 23F
06/11 19:27, 23F
→
06/11 19:27, , 24F
06/11 19:27, 24F
噓
06/11 19:28, , 25F
06/11 19:28, 25F
→
06/11 19:28, , 26F
06/11 19:28, 26F
→
06/11 19:28, , 27F
06/11 19:28, 27F
推
06/11 19:29, , 28F
06/11 19:29, 28F
→
06/11 19:30, , 29F
06/11 19:30, 29F
→
06/11 19:30, , 30F
06/11 19:30, 30F
擬法躲過皇民說根本是不可能的事情,你先找一條「類似的法條」來看看
你以為是在訂版規嗎? XDDDDDD
※ 編輯: adm123 (42.73.36.98), 06/11/2016 19:31:00
※ 編輯: adm123 (42.73.36.98), 06/11/2016 19:31:38
→
06/11 19:31, , 31F
06/11 19:31, 31F
推
06/11 19:34, , 32F
06/11 19:34, 32F
還有 143 則推文
還有 2 段內文
→
06/11 21:47, , 176F
06/11 21:47, 176F
→
06/11 21:48, , 177F
06/11 21:48, 177F
→
06/11 21:48, , 178F
06/11 21:48, 178F
→
06/11 21:48, , 179F
06/11 21:48, 179F
→
06/11 21:48, , 180F
06/11 21:48, 180F
→
06/11 21:49, , 181F
06/11 21:49, 181F
→
06/11 21:50, , 182F
06/11 21:50, 182F
噓
06/11 21:50, , 183F
06/11 21:50, 183F
推
06/11 21:50, , 184F
06/11 21:50, 184F
→
06/11 21:52, , 185F
06/11 21:52, 185F
→
06/11 21:53, , 186F
06/11 21:53, 186F
→
06/11 21:53, , 187F
06/11 21:53, 187F
→
06/11 21:53, , 188F
06/11 21:53, 188F
→
06/11 21:53, , 189F
06/11 21:53, 189F
→
06/11 21:55, , 190F
06/11 21:55, 190F
→
06/11 21:55, , 191F
06/11 21:55, 191F
→
06/11 21:56, , 192F
06/11 21:56, 192F
→
06/11 21:57, , 193F
06/11 21:57, 193F
→
06/11 21:57, , 194F
06/11 21:57, 194F
→
06/11 21:59, , 195F
06/11 21:59, 195F
推
06/11 22:21, , 196F
06/11 22:21, 196F
推
06/11 22:33, , 197F
06/11 22:33, 197F
→
06/11 22:43, , 198F
06/11 22:43, 198F
推
06/11 22:47, , 199F
06/11 22:47, 199F
噓
06/11 23:22, , 200F
06/11 23:22, 200F
→
06/12 00:30, , 201F
06/12 00:30, 201F
→
06/12 00:32, , 202F
06/12 00:32, 202F
→
06/12 00:33, , 203F
06/12 00:33, 203F
→
06/12 00:33, , 204F
06/12 00:33, 204F
推
06/12 01:05, , 205F
06/12 01:05, 205F
→
06/12 01:06, , 206F
06/12 01:06, 206F
→
06/12 01:06, , 207F
06/12 01:06, 207F
推
06/12 01:29, , 208F
06/12 01:29, 208F
→
06/12 01:29, , 209F
06/12 01:29, 209F
推
06/12 12:19, , 210F
06/12 12:19, 210F
→
06/12 12:19, , 211F
06/12 12:19, 211F
→
06/12 12:19, , 212F
06/12 12:19, 212F
推
06/12 20:02, , 213F
06/12 20:02, 213F
→
06/12 20:02, , 214F
06/12 20:02, 214F
推
06/18 19:10, , 215F
06/18 19:10, 215F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):