Re: [討論] 準駐日代表居然反對軍艦護漁 這是叛國?!消失
※ 引述《bul (腹內原來草莽)》之銘言:
: 準駐日代表居然反對軍艦護漁 這是叛國?!
: 什麼叫「軍艦的意義,我不贊成,因為軍艦的意義就是不惜戰爭」
: 這是駐日代表應該說的話嗎?!
: 居然這麼赤裸裸的在幫日本出聲 完全沒有捍衛中華民國主權
: 這樣的準駐日代表 時代力量還繼續吃炸雞嗎?!
: 這樣的準駐日代表 民進黨立委還不跳出來暴走嗎?!
: 這樣的準駐日代表 蔡英文不換人民要繼續挺嗎?!
海巡屬於警察系統
軍艦屬於軍隊系統
軍事的對峙 對區域穩定的影響
遠遠超過警察對峙的影響
海巡署跟日本海上保安廳 不管怎樣互相噴水、互嗆
區域緊張度都不會太高
但如果以軍隊系統去宣示 對方為求對等地位
通常也會以軍隊系統出來回應 將提高區域的緊張
最好的例子 就是
之前太平島也有海軍陸戰隊 後來撤掉
改成海巡署
另外 通常是涉及主權紛爭 才會以軍隊系統去做宣示
或者是出人命的事件
例如釣魚島(主權問題) 菲律賓射殺漁民(出人命)
但沖之鳥礁事件
無關主權(礁的主權屬於日本所有 這點沒爭議)
只關漁權
漁權爭議 用到軍隊 確實是過當的
要討論可以 但想批判人家叛國......
建議先充實相關方面知識 再來批判
不然只是自曝其短
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 182.235.220.205
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1462375183.A.CC0.html
→
05/04 23:27, , 1F
05/04 23:27, 1F
→
05/04 23:28, , 2F
05/04 23:28, 2F
→
05/04 23:28, , 3F
05/04 23:28, 3F
→
05/04 23:29, , 4F
05/04 23:29, 4F
→
05/04 23:30, , 5F
05/04 23:30, 5F
→
05/04 23:30, , 6F
05/04 23:30, 6F
→
05/04 23:31, , 7F
05/04 23:31, 7F
→
05/04 23:31, , 8F
05/04 23:31, 8F
→
05/04 23:32, , 9F
05/04 23:32, 9F
→
05/04 23:32, , 10F
05/04 23:32, 10F
→
05/04 23:34, , 11F
05/04 23:34, 11F
→
05/04 23:35, , 12F
05/04 23:35, 12F
→
05/04 23:35, , 13F
05/04 23:35, 13F
→
05/04 23:36, , 14F
05/04 23:36, 14F
→
05/04 23:36, , 15F
05/04 23:36, 15F
→
05/04 23:36, , 16F
05/04 23:36, 16F
→
05/04 23:37, , 17F
05/04 23:37, 17F
→
05/04 23:37, , 18F
05/04 23:37, 18F
→
05/04 23:37, , 19F
05/04 23:37, 19F
→
05/04 23:38, , 20F
05/04 23:38, 20F
→
05/04 23:38, , 21F
05/04 23:38, 21F
→
05/04 23:39, , 22F
05/04 23:39, 22F
→
05/04 23:39, , 23F
05/04 23:39, 23F
→
05/04 23:39, , 24F
05/04 23:39, 24F
→
05/04 23:40, , 25F
05/04 23:40, 25F
→
05/04 23:40, , 26F
05/04 23:40, 26F
→
05/04 23:41, , 27F
05/04 23:41, 27F
→
05/04 23:42, , 28F
05/04 23:42, 28F
→
05/04 23:42, , 29F
05/04 23:42, 29F
→
05/04 23:43, , 30F
05/04 23:43, 30F
→
05/04 23:43, , 31F
05/04 23:43, 31F
→
05/04 23:43, , 32F
05/04 23:43, 32F
→
05/04 23:43, , 33F
05/04 23:43, 33F
→
05/04 23:44, , 34F
05/04 23:44, 34F
→
05/04 23:45, , 35F
05/04 23:45, 35F
→
05/04 23:46, , 36F
05/04 23:46, 36F
→
05/04 23:47, , 37F
05/04 23:47, 37F
→
05/04 23:47, , 38F
05/04 23:47, 38F
→
05/04 23:47, , 39F
05/04 23:47, 39F
→
05/04 23:48, , 40F
05/04 23:48, 40F
→
05/04 23:48, , 41F
05/04 23:48, 41F
→
05/04 23:49, , 42F
05/04 23:49, 42F
→
05/04 23:49, , 43F
05/04 23:49, 43F
→
05/04 23:49, , 44F
05/04 23:49, 44F
→
05/04 23:50, , 45F
05/04 23:50, 45F
→
05/04 23:50, , 46F
05/04 23:50, 46F
→
05/04 23:50, , 47F
05/04 23:50, 47F
→
05/04 23:50, , 48F
05/04 23:50, 48F
→
05/04 23:50, , 49F
05/04 23:50, 49F
→
05/04 23:51, , 50F
05/04 23:51, 50F
→
05/04 23:51, , 51F
05/04 23:51, 51F
→
05/04 23:51, , 52F
05/04 23:51, 52F
→
05/04 23:52, , 53F
05/04 23:52, 53F
→
05/04 23:52, , 54F
05/04 23:52, 54F
→
05/04 23:53, , 55F
05/04 23:53, 55F
→
05/04 23:53, , 56F
05/04 23:53, 56F
→
05/04 23:53, , 57F
05/04 23:53, 57F
→
05/04 23:54, , 58F
05/04 23:54, 58F
→
05/04 23:55, , 59F
05/04 23:55, 59F
→
05/04 23:56, , 60F
05/04 23:56, 60F
→
05/04 23:56, , 61F
05/04 23:56, 61F
→
05/04 23:57, , 62F
05/04 23:57, 62F
→
05/04 23:59, , 63F
05/04 23:59, 63F
→
05/05 00:00, , 64F
05/05 00:00, 64F
→
05/05 00:00, , 65F
05/05 00:00, 65F
→
05/05 00:00, , 66F
05/05 00:00, 66F
→
05/05 00:00, , 67F
05/05 00:00, 67F
→
05/05 00:30, , 68F
05/05 00:30, 68F
→
05/05 00:31, , 69F
05/05 00:31, 69F
→
05/05 00:32, , 70F
05/05 00:32, 70F
→
05/05 00:32, , 71F
05/05 00:32, 71F
推
05/05 09:54, , 72F
05/05 09:54, 72F
推
05/05 11:29, , 73F
05/05 11:29, 73F
噓
05/05 23:07, , 74F
05/05 23:07, 74F
→
05/05 23:07, , 75F
05/05 23:07, 75F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):