Re: [新聞] 為打擊IS 川普:不排除用核武消失
有鑑於某國教授說"很多炸彈的威力超過小型核武",看到嘴巴掉下來。
目前最強大的常規炸彈,大概就是美製的空氣燃燒炸彈,俗稱炸彈之母,很猛,丟一顆下
去幾百平方米的任何物體都會燃燒殆盡,周邊高溫會造成嚴重灼傷跟窒息。
但是他的爆炸當量是多少呢?大概20噸不到,俄國也弄個類似的炸彈之父,當量也差不多
。
戰術核武也就是所謂的小型應用核武,有飛彈啦,砲彈啦,魚雷水雷,但是隨便都破千噸
當量,甚至是一萬到五千噸是正常的,戰略核武都是百萬噸起跳。
戰術核武的設計是要在瞬間消滅整個師或艦隊或是大型要塞,就算再不濟,一枚戰術核武
也夠把台北市夷平,幾百幾十噸的威力不如就叫飛機轟炸比較實在。
能不能做出像FO4那種幾百噸的核武,當然有,但是美國很快就放棄啦,而且還嚴格限定
核武的噸數一定要一定水準,就是怕把核武當常規炸彈丟,模糊了威懾用跟實際作戰用的
界線。
就算叫整個編隊的B52載滿炸彈媽一起丟,可能威力還不到戰術核武的一兩成
所以一定要阻止川普啊!!!!這傢伙瘋惹
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.15.163.80
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1458909829.A.EB3.html
※ 編輯: bill6613 (101.15.163.80), 03/25/2016 20:45:06
→
03/25 20:54, , 1F
03/25 20:54, 1F
→
03/25 20:55, , 2F
03/25 20:55, 2F
→
03/25 20:59, , 3F
03/25 20:59, 3F
→
03/25 20:59, , 4F
03/25 20:59, 4F
推
03/25 21:00, , 5F
03/25 21:00, 5F
→
03/25 21:01, , 6F
03/25 21:01, 6F
→
03/25 21:01, , 7F
03/25 21:01, 7F
→
03/25 21:08, , 8F
03/25 21:08, 8F
→
03/25 21:11, , 9F
03/25 21:11, 9F
推
03/25 21:13, , 10F
03/25 21:13, 10F
→
03/25 21:17, , 11F
03/25 21:17, 11F
→
03/25 21:18, , 12F
03/25 21:18, 12F
→
03/25 21:18, , 13F
03/25 21:18, 13F
→
03/25 21:18, , 14F
03/25 21:18, 14F
推
03/25 21:19, , 15F
03/25 21:19, 15F
→
03/25 21:19, , 16F
03/25 21:19, 16F
→
03/25 21:19, , 17F
03/25 21:19, 17F
→
03/25 21:21, , 18F
03/25 21:21, 18F
推
03/25 21:22, , 19F
03/25 21:22, 19F
→
03/25 21:22, , 20F
03/25 21:22, 20F
→
03/25 21:22, , 21F
03/25 21:22, 21F
→
03/25 21:22, , 22F
03/25 21:22, 22F
→
03/25 21:23, , 23F
03/25 21:23, 23F
→
03/25 21:23, , 24F
03/25 21:23, 24F
→
03/25 21:23, , 25F
03/25 21:23, 25F
→
03/25 21:23, , 26F
03/25 21:23, 26F
→
03/25 21:23, , 27F
03/25 21:23, 27F
→
03/25 21:24, , 28F
03/25 21:24, 28F
→
03/25 21:25, , 29F
03/25 21:25, 29F
→
03/25 21:26, , 30F
03/25 21:26, 30F
→
03/25 21:26, , 31F
03/25 21:26, 31F
推
03/25 21:27, , 32F
03/25 21:27, 32F
→
03/25 21:28, , 33F
03/25 21:28, 33F
→
03/25 21:29, , 34F
03/25 21:29, 34F
→
03/25 21:29, , 35F
03/25 21:29, 35F
→
03/25 21:31, , 36F
03/25 21:31, 36F
→
03/25 21:31, , 37F
03/25 21:31, 37F
→
03/25 21:31, , 38F
03/25 21:31, 38F
→
03/25 21:32, , 39F
03/25 21:32, 39F
還有 21 則推文
→
03/25 21:38, , 61F
03/25 21:38, 61F
→
03/25 21:39, , 62F
03/25 21:39, 62F
→
03/25 21:39, , 63F
03/25 21:39, 63F
→
03/25 21:40, , 64F
03/25 21:40, 64F
→
03/25 21:41, , 65F
03/25 21:41, 65F
→
03/25 21:41, , 66F
03/25 21:41, 66F
→
03/25 21:42, , 67F
03/25 21:42, 67F
→
03/25 21:42, , 68F
03/25 21:42, 68F
→
03/25 21:42, , 69F
03/25 21:42, 69F
→
03/25 21:42, , 70F
03/25 21:42, 70F
→
03/25 21:42, , 71F
03/25 21:42, 71F
→
03/25 21:43, , 72F
03/25 21:43, 72F
→
03/25 21:43, , 73F
03/25 21:43, 73F
→
03/25 21:43, , 74F
03/25 21:43, 74F
→
03/25 21:45, , 75F
03/25 21:45, 75F
推
03/25 21:45, , 76F
03/25 21:45, 76F
→
03/25 21:45, , 77F
03/25 21:45, 77F
→
03/25 21:46, , 78F
03/25 21:46, 78F
→
03/25 21:46, , 79F
03/25 21:46, 79F
→
03/25 21:47, , 80F
03/25 21:47, 80F
→
03/25 21:47, , 81F
03/25 21:47, 81F
→
03/25 21:47, , 82F
03/25 21:47, 82F
噓
03/25 22:33, , 83F
03/25 22:33, 83F
推
03/25 23:02, , 84F
03/25 23:02, 84F
→
03/25 23:04, , 85F
03/25 23:04, 85F
→
03/25 23:05, , 86F
03/25 23:05, 86F
推
03/25 23:15, , 87F
03/25 23:15, 87F
→
03/25 23:16, , 88F
03/25 23:16, 88F
→
03/25 23:17, , 89F
03/25 23:17, 89F
→
03/25 23:18, , 90F
03/25 23:18, 90F
→
03/25 23:19, , 91F
03/25 23:19, 91F
推
03/25 23:22, , 92F
03/25 23:22, 92F
→
03/25 23:23, , 93F
03/25 23:23, 93F
→
03/25 23:23, , 94F
03/25 23:23, 94F
→
03/25 23:24, , 95F
03/25 23:24, 95F
→
03/25 23:25, , 96F
03/25 23:25, 96F
→
03/25 23:25, , 97F
03/25 23:25, 97F
推
03/26 00:15, , 98F
03/26 00:15, 98F
→
03/26 00:16, , 99F
03/26 00:16, 99F
推
03/26 16:25, , 100F
03/26 16:25, 100F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):