[討論] 柯文哲跟柯建銘到底有啥好關係啊消失
如題
這次選舉
柯文哲有啥不錄音、不錄影、不站台、不掃街的四不原則
當然除了有時後疏忽所以小破功的不算
幾乎就是不想明確說出來挺誰
可是對柯建銘則是完全不一樣
全力相挺,且是明挺,沒有在搞啥曖昧的
也就是這次立委,柯文哲明確挺的只有柯建銘
昨天看政論忘記哪台誰說的,說1/15選前之夜柯P可能還會去柯建銘選前之夜
為啥?
柯建銘是對柯文哲有啥特別的恩情嗎?
有相關八卦嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.116.53.231
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1451703158.A.63F.html
推
01/02 10:53, , 1F
01/02 10:53, 1F
推
01/02 10:53, , 2F
01/02 10:53, 2F
推
01/02 10:54, , 3F
01/02 10:54, 3F
推
01/02 10:55, , 4F
01/02 10:55, 4F
推
01/02 10:57, , 5F
01/02 10:57, 5F
推
01/02 10:58, , 6F
01/02 10:58, 6F
推
01/02 10:59, , 7F
01/02 10:59, 7F
推
01/02 11:00, , 8F
01/02 11:00, 8F
推
01/02 11:00, , 9F
01/02 11:00, 9F
→
01/02 11:02, , 10F
01/02 11:02, 10F
推
01/02 11:05, , 11F
01/02 11:05, 11F
→
01/02 11:06, , 12F
01/02 11:06, 12F
推
01/02 11:06, , 13F
01/02 11:06, 13F
→
01/02 11:06, , 14F
01/02 11:06, 14F
→
01/02 11:07, , 15F
01/02 11:07, 15F
推
01/02 11:08, , 16F
01/02 11:08, 16F
推
01/02 11:08, , 17F
01/02 11:08, 17F
推
01/02 11:09, , 18F
01/02 11:09, 18F
→
01/02 11:09, , 19F
01/02 11:09, 19F
推
01/02 11:09, , 20F
01/02 11:09, 20F
→
01/02 11:10, , 21F
01/02 11:10, 21F
推
01/02 11:10, , 22F
01/02 11:10, 22F
→
01/02 11:10, , 23F
01/02 11:10, 23F
→
01/02 11:11, , 24F
01/02 11:11, 24F
推
01/02 11:12, , 25F
01/02 11:12, 25F
推
01/02 11:12, , 26F
01/02 11:12, 26F
→
01/02 11:13, , 27F
01/02 11:13, 27F
推
01/02 11:14, , 28F
01/02 11:14, 28F
→
01/02 11:14, , 29F
01/02 11:14, 29F
推
01/02 11:16, , 30F
01/02 11:16, 30F
→
01/02 11:17, , 31F
01/02 11:17, 31F
推
01/02 11:18, , 32F
01/02 11:18, 32F
→
01/02 11:19, , 33F
01/02 11:19, 33F
→
01/02 11:20, , 34F
01/02 11:20, 34F
推
01/02 11:20, , 35F
01/02 11:20, 35F
推
01/02 11:22, , 36F
01/02 11:22, 36F
推
01/02 11:23, , 37F
01/02 11:23, 37F
推
01/02 11:23, , 38F
01/02 11:23, 38F
推
01/02 11:23, , 39F
01/02 11:23, 39F
推
01/02 11:23, , 40F
01/02 11:23, 40F
→
01/02 11:24, , 41F
01/02 11:24, 41F
推
01/02 11:24, , 42F
01/02 11:24, 42F
推
01/02 11:27, , 43F
01/02 11:27, 43F
→
01/02 11:29, , 44F
01/02 11:29, 44F
推
01/02 11:34, , 45F
01/02 11:34, 45F
→
01/02 11:41, , 46F
01/02 11:41, 46F
→
01/02 11:41, , 47F
01/02 11:41, 47F
→
01/02 11:42, , 48F
01/02 11:42, 48F
→
01/02 11:42, , 49F
01/02 11:42, 49F
推
01/02 11:51, , 50F
01/02 11:51, 50F
→
01/02 12:40, , 51F
01/02 12:40, 51F
推
01/02 12:42, , 52F
01/02 12:42, 52F
推
01/02 12:48, , 53F
01/02 12:48, 53F
推
01/02 13:00, , 54F
01/02 13:00, 54F
→
01/02 13:00, , 55F
01/02 13:00, 55F
→
01/02 13:00, , 56F
01/02 13:00, 56F
→
01/02 13:01, , 57F
01/02 13:01, 57F
→
01/02 13:02, , 58F
01/02 13:02, 58F
→
01/02 13:11, , 59F
01/02 13:11, 59F
→
01/02 13:12, , 60F
01/02 13:12, 60F
→
01/02 13:14, , 61F
01/02 13:14, 61F
推
01/02 14:08, , 62F
01/02 14:08, 62F
→
01/02 14:33, , 63F
01/02 14:33, 63F
推
01/02 14:37, , 64F
01/02 14:37, 64F
推
01/02 16:40, , 65F
01/02 16:40, 65F
→
01/02 16:41, , 66F
01/02 16:41, 66F
→
01/02 16:42, , 67F
01/02 16:42, 67F
→
01/02 16:42, , 68F
01/02 16:42, 68F
推
01/02 18:10, , 69F
01/02 18:10, 69F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):