Re: [建議] 有關版主對 setzer:"花果山猴子"這個判決
我有意見可以說嗎
因為我真的搞不懂
猴子就是在花果山吃香蕉打混..所以說花果山猴子
合理
但是虫且呢??虫且在不就是就是在糞坑中玩
所以不能說糞坑打滾 ??
這樣定義為攻擊性
然後 → setzer:食屍吱 XD
吃屍體反而ok???
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.169.86.30
※ 編輯: tosay 來自: 118.169.86.30 (07/11 22:06)
推
07/11 22:05, , 1F
07/11 22:05, 1F
推
07/11 22:06, , 2F
07/11 22:06, 2F
推
07/11 22:06, , 3F
07/11 22:06, 3F
推
07/11 22:06, , 4F
07/11 22:06, 4F
→
07/11 22:07, , 5F
07/11 22:07, 5F
→
07/11 22:08, , 6F
07/11 22:08, 6F
→
07/11 22:08, , 7F
07/11 22:08, 7F
推
07/11 22:08, , 8F
07/11 22:08, 8F
推
07/11 22:09, , 9F
07/11 22:09, 9F
→
07/11 22:10, , 10F
07/11 22:10, 10F
→
07/11 22:10, , 11F
07/11 22:10, 11F
推
07/11 22:10, , 12F
07/11 22:10, 12F
既然版主大大都說了..吱跟蛆都是特定[選民]的代稱 ,要以人的代稱來看
所以吃屎蛆是不行的
那食屍的圖片??
http://ppt.cc/6Of5
食屍人的電影
http://www.verycd.com/entries/84420/
不過把肉食者當成食屍..也真佩服妳的XD
※ 編輯: tosay 來自: 118.169.86.30 (07/11 22:17)
推
07/11 22:13, , 13F
07/11 22:13, 13F
→
07/11 22:13, , 14F
07/11 22:13, 14F
→
07/11 22:13, , 15F
07/11 22:13, 15F
→
07/11 22:14, , 16F
07/11 22:14, 16F
→
07/11 22:14, , 17F
07/11 22:14, 17F
→
07/11 22:14, , 18F
07/11 22:14, 18F
→
07/11 22:15, , 19F
07/11 22:15, 19F
→
07/11 22:15, , 20F
07/11 22:15, 20F
→
07/11 22:16, , 21F
07/11 22:16, 21F
→
07/11 22:16, , 22F
07/11 22:16, 22F
推
07/11 22:17, , 23F
07/11 22:17, 23F
推
07/11 22:18, , 24F
07/11 22:18, 24F
→
07/11 22:19, , 25F
07/11 22:19, 25F
推
07/12 00:59, , 26F
07/12 00:59, 26F
推
07/12 21:23, , 27F
07/12 21:23, 27F
推
07/13 01:59, , 28F
07/13 01:59, 28F
→
07/13 08:39, , 29F
07/13 08:39, 29F
→
07/13 11:23, , 30F
07/13 11:23, 30F
→
07/13 11:24, , 31F
07/13 11:24, 31F
→
07/13 11:25, , 32F
07/13 11:25, 32F
→
07/13 11:26, , 33F
07/13 11:26, 33F
→
07/21 11:11, , 34F
07/21 11:11, 34F
→
07/21 11:13, , 35F
07/21 11:13, 35F
→
07/21 11:13, , 36F
07/21 11:13, 36F
→
07/23 22:42, , 37F
07/23 22:42, 37F
推
07/26 15:28, , 38F
07/26 15:28, 38F
→
07/28 15:43, , 39F
07/28 15:43, 39F
→
07/28 15:43, , 40F
07/28 15:43, 40F
推
04/06 12:03, , 41F
04/06 12:03, 41F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):