Re: [討論] 敗處與長中繼
並不是先發被打爆了比賽就等於輸了好嗎?
先發投不完應有局數,但是球隊還是要有人
上來維持住差距,讓比分不擴大,接著期待
自己的進攻能追回比數。以上動作哪裡是放
棄贏球了?KUO 擔任的這個凍結比分差的工
作,哪裡有放棄比賽的企圖的?會放KOU 上
來,就是想贏球的!!
對MLB球隊來說,落後個4 5分根本不到認輸
的程度。不要老是覺得別人虧待自己人,搞
清楚狀況……
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.167.172.239
※ 編輯: buehrle 來自: 218.167.172.239 (06/14 06:09)
※ 編輯: buehrle 來自: 218.167.172.239 (06/14 06:11)
→
06/14 06:36, , 1F
06/14 06:36, 1F
→
06/14 06:39, , 2F
06/14 06:39, 2F
→
06/14 06:40, , 3F
06/14 06:40, 3F
→
06/14 06:42, , 4F
06/14 06:42, 4F
→
06/14 06:43, , 5F
06/14 06:43, 5F
推
06/14 10:06, , 6F
06/14 10:06, 6F
推
06/14 10:59, , 7F
06/14 10:59, 7F
→
06/14 11:04, , 8F
06/14 11:04, 8F
→
06/14 11:04, , 9F
06/14 11:04, 9F
推
06/14 11:27, , 10F
06/14 11:27, 10F
→
06/14 11:28, , 11F
06/14 11:28, 11F
→
06/14 12:08, , 12F
06/14 12:08, 12F
→
06/14 12:09, , 13F
06/14 12:09, 13F
→
06/14 12:10, , 14F
06/14 12:10, 14F
→
06/14 12:11, , 15F
06/14 12:11, 15F
→
06/14 12:13, , 16F
06/14 12:13, 16F
→
06/14 12:13, , 17F
06/14 12:13, 17F
→
06/14 13:42, , 18F
06/14 13:42, 18F
→
06/14 13:43, , 19F
06/14 13:43, 19F
→
06/15 09:49, , 20F
06/15 09:49, 20F
→
06/15 09:50, , 21F
06/15 09:50, 21F
討論串 (同標題文章)