Re: [討論] 陳明軒是不是應該轉RP比較適合 ?
富邦這三隻年輕投手除了黃亦志可以無腦配球以外另外兩個都很吃捕手
黃只要手狀況正常他會自己把球修得比較進去好球帶,就是自己會很積極適應比賽狀況的人,所以他狀況好會異常省球數,狀況不好會一直被打,因為他手狀況一直不好,今年一整個糟糕,其實他剛進富邦第一年也是這樣,這三個裡面他最成熟,但如果真的狀況一直隨著手臂狀況起伏這麼大,他反而未來最可能沒辦法吃固定先發。
林政賢的問題是投球動作不固定他控不準,保送總比丟進去好所以就丟比較外面,但是他變化球引誘力真的很好,打者還是會被騙。但他很多保送可以說來自於丟了很多不必要的引誘球,結果捕手也是一直摳在浪費球。
陳明軒的問題就是他沒有可以用的指叉或變速,以前的中職他光靠144均速+滑球一定是固定先發,但現在真的很拼,他今年有多練變速,但也看不太出來有找到用法,其實放他上來就是來付學費的,捕手就應該要敢配,偏偏林崑笙這個唯一及格的捕手很少上了,現在簡直變成郭泓志專武似的後段才上= =
好重點就是陳明軒其實應該再花個一年練練變速球,這種速球有威力的投手練起來至少吃個五號一定沒問題,不用這麼早放棄啦,趁現在還有幾次先發多練練就是了,富邦問題最大的就是捕手,除了林崑笙剩下的根本都沒有先發的本事,然後因為沒捕手一直先發。
-----
Sent from JPTT on my Sony F5121.
--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.136.79.155
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Guardians/M.1502549125.A.A99.html
推
08/12 22:46, , 1F
08/12 22:46, 1F
推
08/12 22:47, , 2F
08/12 22:47, 2F
推
08/12 22:52, , 3F
08/12 22:52, 3F
推
08/12 22:54, , 4F
08/12 22:54, 4F
推
08/12 22:54, , 5F
08/12 22:54, 5F
→
08/12 22:56, , 6F
08/12 22:56, 6F
推
08/12 22:58, , 7F
08/12 22:58, 7F
→
08/12 22:59, , 8F
08/12 22:59, 8F
推
08/12 23:01, , 9F
08/12 23:01, 9F
→
08/12 23:01, , 10F
08/12 23:01, 10F
→
08/12 23:07, , 11F
08/12 23:07, 11F
→
08/12 23:08, , 12F
08/12 23:08, 12F
→
08/12 23:08, , 13F
08/12 23:08, 13F
→
08/12 23:09, , 14F
08/12 23:09, 14F
推
08/12 23:10, , 15F
08/12 23:10, 15F
→
08/12 23:10, , 16F
08/12 23:10, 16F
推
08/12 23:11, , 17F
08/12 23:11, 17F
推
08/12 23:20, , 18F
08/12 23:20, 18F
→
08/12 23:20, , 19F
08/12 23:20, 19F
→
08/12 23:20, , 20F
08/12 23:20, 20F
推
08/12 23:34, , 21F
08/12 23:34, 21F
推
08/12 23:34, , 22F
08/12 23:34, 22F
→
08/12 23:43, , 23F
08/12 23:43, 23F
推
08/12 23:49, , 24F
08/12 23:49, 24F
推
08/12 23:55, , 25F
08/12 23:55, 25F
推
08/13 00:00, , 26F
08/13 00:00, 26F
推
08/13 00:02, , 27F
08/13 00:02, 27F
推
08/13 00:13, , 28F
08/13 00:13, 28F
→
08/13 00:13, , 29F
08/13 00:13, 29F
推
08/13 00:22, , 30F
08/13 00:22, 30F
→
08/13 00:22, , 31F
08/13 00:22, 31F
→
08/13 00:24, , 32F
08/13 00:24, 32F
→
08/13 00:25, , 33F
08/13 00:25, 33F
推
08/13 00:27, , 34F
08/13 00:27, 34F
推
08/13 00:38, , 35F
08/13 00:38, 35F
→
08/13 00:38, , 36F
08/13 00:38, 36F
推
08/13 00:39, , 37F
08/13 00:39, 37F
推
08/13 00:41, , 38F
08/13 00:41, 38F
推
08/13 01:13, , 39F
08/13 01:13, 39F
→
08/13 01:15, , 40F
08/13 01:15, 40F
推
08/13 01:16, , 41F
08/13 01:16, 41F
→
08/13 01:16, , 42F
08/13 01:16, 42F
推
08/13 01:19, , 43F
08/13 01:19, 43F
→
08/13 01:19, , 44F
08/13 01:19, 44F
推
08/13 01:21, , 45F
08/13 01:21, 45F
推
08/13 01:23, , 46F
08/13 01:23, 46F
→
08/13 01:25, , 47F
08/13 01:25, 47F
推
08/13 01:40, , 48F
08/13 01:40, 48F
推
08/13 06:25, , 49F
08/13 06:25, 49F
→
08/13 06:25, , 50F
08/13 06:25, 50F
推
08/13 06:35, , 51F
08/13 06:35, 51F
→
08/13 06:35, , 52F
08/13 06:35, 52F
→
08/13 06:35, , 53F
08/13 06:35, 53F
推
08/13 09:23, , 54F
08/13 09:23, 54F
推
08/13 09:28, , 55F
08/13 09:28, 55F
推
08/13 09:45, , 56F
08/13 09:45, 56F
→
08/13 09:45, , 57F
08/13 09:45, 57F
→
08/13 09:45, , 58F
08/13 09:45, 58F
→
08/13 09:45, , 59F
08/13 09:45, 59F
推
08/13 10:04, , 60F
08/13 10:04, 60F
→
08/13 10:04, , 61F
08/13 10:04, 61F
→
08/13 10:08, , 62F
08/13 10:08, 62F
→
08/13 10:08, , 63F
08/13 10:08, 63F
推
08/13 10:28, , 64F
08/13 10:28, 64F
→
08/13 10:28, , 65F
08/13 10:28, 65F
→
08/13 10:28, , 66F
08/13 10:28, 66F
→
08/13 10:38, , 67F
08/13 10:38, 67F
→
08/13 10:38, , 68F
08/13 10:38, 68F
→
08/13 10:42, , 69F
08/13 10:42, 69F
→
08/13 10:42, , 70F
08/13 10:42, 70F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):
討論
72
134