[討論] 談談信任野球
對於葉君璋上一軍教頭,早就知道會有這樣的反應
帶的好,帶不好,總是會出現一些聲浪說葉君璋的調度有問題
尤其是今天這場比賽
原本領先的比賽,讓一個投超過120球的投手繼續投下去的理由是什麼?
然後換上來的又是壘上有人又很容易投不好的羅嘉仁
搞到最後希克敗投,羅嘉仁救援失敗
板上又是一團亂,說什麼羅嘉仁釋出什麼的
說真的我自己也很難過,
但我相信教練團 球員會更難過,他們也有戰績壓力,代表用人不對
只是我想知道,葉總把羅嘉仁調離終結者後,讓他留在一軍的原因是為了信任他嗎?
還是沒有想過讓他到二軍調整,而不是用實戰調整?
葉總的信任野球是這樣信任球員,但讓戰績表現更差,這對他的未來也不是好事啊。
開放給大家討論
--
至於如果從這篇開始繼續說釋出那些的,那就不用留言了
講釋出是要誰去投?然後你說了算嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.235.165.251
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Rhinos/M.1438521333.A.DCF.html
推
08/02 21:17, , 1F
08/02 21:17, 1F
→
08/02 21:17, , 2F
08/02 21:17, 2F
推
08/02 21:18, , 3F
08/02 21:18, 3F
→
08/02 21:18, , 4F
08/02 21:18, 4F
→
08/02 21:18, , 5F
08/02 21:18, 5F
→
08/02 21:18, , 6F
08/02 21:18, 6F
推
08/02 21:18, , 7F
08/02 21:18, 7F
→
08/02 21:18, , 8F
08/02 21:18, 8F
推
08/02 21:18, , 9F
08/02 21:18, 9F
→
08/02 21:19, , 10F
08/02 21:19, 10F
→
08/02 21:19, , 11F
08/02 21:19, 11F
推
08/02 21:19, , 12F
08/02 21:19, 12F
→
08/02 21:19, , 13F
08/02 21:19, 13F
→
08/02 21:19, , 14F
08/02 21:19, 14F
→
08/02 21:19, , 15F
08/02 21:19, 15F
推
08/02 21:19, , 16F
08/02 21:19, 16F
→
08/02 21:20, , 17F
08/02 21:20, 17F
推
08/02 21:20, , 18F
08/02 21:20, 18F
→
08/02 21:20, , 19F
08/02 21:20, 19F
→
08/02 21:20, , 20F
08/02 21:20, 20F
→
08/02 21:20, , 21F
08/02 21:20, 21F
推
08/02 21:20, , 22F
08/02 21:20, 22F
推
08/02 21:20, , 23F
08/02 21:20, 23F
→
08/02 21:20, , 24F
08/02 21:20, 24F
→
08/02 21:20, , 25F
08/02 21:20, 25F
→
08/02 21:21, , 26F
08/02 21:21, 26F
→
08/02 21:21, , 27F
08/02 21:21, 27F
→
08/02 21:21, , 28F
08/02 21:21, 28F
推
08/02 21:21, , 29F
08/02 21:21, 29F
→
08/02 21:21, , 30F
08/02 21:21, 30F
推
08/02 21:21, , 31F
08/02 21:21, 31F
→
08/02 21:21, , 32F
08/02 21:21, 32F
→
08/02 21:21, , 33F
08/02 21:21, 33F
→
08/02 21:21, , 34F
08/02 21:21, 34F
→
08/02 21:21, , 35F
08/02 21:21, 35F
→
08/02 21:21, , 36F
08/02 21:21, 36F
推
08/02 21:22, , 37F
08/02 21:22, 37F
推
08/02 21:22, , 38F
08/02 21:22, 38F
→
08/02 21:22, , 39F
08/02 21:22, 39F
還有 57 則推文
推
08/02 21:35, , 97F
08/02 21:35, 97F
→
08/02 21:35, , 98F
08/02 21:35, 98F
→
08/02 21:35, , 99F
08/02 21:35, 99F
推
08/02 21:36, , 100F
08/02 21:36, 100F
→
08/02 21:36, , 101F
08/02 21:36, 101F
→
08/02 21:36, , 102F
08/02 21:36, 102F
推
08/02 21:38, , 103F
08/02 21:38, 103F
→
08/02 21:42, , 104F
08/02 21:42, 104F
→
08/02 21:43, , 105F
08/02 21:43, 105F
→
08/02 21:43, , 106F
08/02 21:43, 106F
→
08/02 21:43, , 107F
08/02 21:43, 107F
→
08/02 21:43, , 108F
08/02 21:43, 108F
推
08/02 21:44, , 109F
08/02 21:44, 109F
推
08/02 21:46, , 110F
08/02 21:46, 110F
推
08/02 21:47, , 111F
08/02 21:47, 111F
推
08/02 21:48, , 112F
08/02 21:48, 112F
→
08/02 21:50, , 113F
08/02 21:50, 113F
→
08/02 21:51, , 114F
08/02 21:51, 114F
推
08/02 21:52, , 115F
08/02 21:52, 115F
→
08/02 21:54, , 116F
08/02 21:54, 116F
推
08/02 21:54, , 117F
08/02 21:54, 117F
推
08/02 21:54, , 118F
08/02 21:54, 118F
→
08/02 21:55, , 119F
08/02 21:55, 119F
推
08/02 21:57, , 120F
08/02 21:57, 120F
推
08/02 21:58, , 121F
08/02 21:58, 121F
推
08/02 22:11, , 122F
08/02 22:11, 122F
→
08/02 22:17, , 123F
08/02 22:17, 123F
→
08/02 22:18, , 124F
08/02 22:18, 124F
推
08/02 22:35, , 125F
08/02 22:35, 125F
推
08/02 22:42, , 126F
08/02 22:42, 126F
→
08/02 22:42, , 127F
08/02 22:42, 127F
→
08/02 22:43, , 128F
08/02 22:43, 128F
→
08/02 22:43, , 129F
08/02 22:43, 129F
推
08/02 22:43, , 130F
08/02 22:43, 130F
推
08/02 22:44, , 131F
08/02 22:44, 131F
→
08/02 22:44, , 132F
08/02 22:44, 132F
推
08/02 22:47, , 133F
08/02 22:47, 133F
推
08/03 00:30, , 134F
08/03 00:30, 134F
推
08/03 00:50, , 135F
08/03 00:50, 135F
→
08/03 00:50, , 136F
08/03 00:50, 136F
討論串 (同標題文章)