Re: [新聞] 武漢肺炎8市封城破600例18死 WHO:不緊急
譚德塞的圖最近很紅,他肯定中國初期處理武漢肺炎
的透明度,讓我非常無言。
這張圖,可能是出自BBC News的中文臉書。
https://i.imgur.com/YUmw18q.png
https://is.gd/Pho4PF
雖然我在BBC News的英文與中文網站找不到有相關發言
的報導,但我猜該圖指的是譚德塞在2020/01/22的記者
會中所做的發言。
==========================
這段指出中國做完病毒定序分析,立刻就分享資訊,所以
韓國、日本與泰國才能很快判斷出是新型冠狀病毒。
https://youtu.be/46fb8RX-Pnc?t=795
... and the sequencing was done quickly.
But more importantly, it was shared immediately.
And that's why Korea, Japan (and) Thailand were able
to diagnose the new coronavirus quickly.
In addition to that, actions (were) taken immediately,
especially on their market(s). Wuhan Market, seafood
market...
And followed by action, by other actions(?) was
very commendable.
可是我認為應該是:
中國一開始沒有妥善處置,結果帶原者還在別人國家趴趴走,
散播病毒。
中國是不得不分享資訊,因為事情再也掩蓋不下去了。
(而且他們分享的資訊,說不定還要打折)
結果被譚德塞說成好像中國是一個很願意跟別人合作的國家,
真是嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔。
--------------------------------------------------------
而這段,應該就是圖的資料來源。
他肯定中國處理武漢肺炎疫情的透明度。
https://youtu.be/46fb8RX-Pnc?t=3104
I think on the Chinese transparency I have said a lot
earlier, so it will only be a repetition.
But the corporation and transparency is very very
commendable. And we really appreciate it... and we want
that to continue.
And today the committee members have witnessed that during
the presentation from China when they were presenting the
details of what's... what's happening. So we'd like to
encourage them to continue that way.
Transparency is very important, and that really really helps.
And if we're going to keep the world safe, transparency is
number one. And that's what we're seeing happening... and we
encourage them to continue in that direction.
上一段就說中國採取的行動commendable,這一段回答中國處理疫情的
透明度時,一樣說commendable。
我也只能貼這張圖了。
https://i.imgur.com/K7Jdq8Q.png
===============================
備註:
1.雖然有英文字幕,但還是有很多我聽不出來的地方。
有漏聽或誤聽,以致於句子結構不完整或語意不明,還請海涵。
懇請大家指正,感恩。
(1)action那句我真的聽不懂,也不知道為什麼會用was。
(2)the corporation and transparency那句,我一直在掙扎是
cooperation還是corporation。
但因為字幕是顯示corporation,而且它也有市政當局或地方
當局的意思,所以我就選corporation了。
2.Dr.Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus未必是世界上最優秀的公衛專家,
但他肯定比我優秀幾萬倍。
我沒資格審查他的學經歷,但,應該還是能對這種睜眼說瞎話的情況
表達我的感受吧?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.253.13.152 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1579856228.A.045.html
→
01/24 16:58,
4年前
, 1F
01/24 16:58, 1F
推
01/24 16:58,
4年前
, 2F
01/24 16:58, 2F
→
01/24 16:59,
4年前
, 3F
01/24 16:59, 3F
推
01/24 17:00,
4年前
, 4F
01/24 17:00, 4F
→
01/24 17:00,
4年前
, 5F
01/24 17:00, 5F
推
01/24 17:01,
4年前
, 6F
01/24 17:01, 6F
→
01/24 17:02,
4年前
, 7F
01/24 17:02, 7F
推
01/24 17:03,
4年前
, 8F
01/24 17:03, 8F
→
01/24 17:03,
4年前
, 9F
01/24 17:03, 9F
推
01/24 17:18,
4年前
, 10F
01/24 17:18, 10F
推
01/24 17:28,
4年前
, 11F
01/24 17:28, 11F
推
01/24 17:30,
4年前
, 12F
01/24 17:30, 12F
→
01/24 17:31,
4年前
, 13F
01/24 17:31, 13F
推
01/24 17:35,
4年前
, 14F
01/24 17:35, 14F
推
01/24 17:41,
4年前
, 15F
01/24 17:41, 15F
推
01/24 17:49,
4年前
, 16F
01/24 17:49, 16F
→
01/24 17:52,
4年前
, 17F
01/24 17:52, 17F
→
01/24 18:35,
4年前
, 18F
01/24 18:35, 18F
推
01/24 19:16,
4年前
, 19F
01/24 19:16, 19F
→
01/24 22:15,
4年前
, 20F
01/24 22:15, 20F
→
01/25 01:28,
4年前
, 21F
01/25 01:28, 21F
→
01/25 01:29,
4年前
, 22F
01/25 01:29, 22F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 4 篇):