[問卦] 館長整天捐助警消算是賄賂嗎消失
單純捐錢是沒什麼問題啦
但是跟警消越走越近這樣真的沒問題嗎
常常在實況台說自己跟局長很熟啊
請警員喝星巴克 還要捐資讓林口的員警學戰技
說要把林口的警察打造成全台最強的
但是這樣警方拿這麼多 人情可以不給嗎?
俗話說吃人嘴軟 拿人手軟
看似美事一樁
但如果把捐贈人 改成黑道或是酒店
現在這些行為看起來就像是建立一個私有的武裝部隊吧
你要捐錢可以 照理就是捐完什麼都不能管
捐錢還走這麼近 又下指導棋
那員警要叫他陳之漢先生 還是叫他老大?
局長做事要不要看館長面子?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.229.136.107
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1526714224.A.755.html
→
05/19 15:17, , 1F
05/19 15:17, 1F
推
05/19 15:17, , 2F
05/19 15:17, 2F
→
05/19 15:18, , 3F
05/19 15:18, 3F
推
05/19 15:18, , 4F
05/19 15:18, 4F
→
05/19 15:18, , 5F
05/19 15:18, 5F
推
05/19 15:18, , 6F
05/19 15:18, 6F
推
05/19 15:18, , 7F
05/19 15:18, 7F
→
05/19 15:18, , 8F
05/19 15:18, 8F
推
05/19 15:18, , 9F
05/19 15:18, 9F
噓
05/19 15:19, , 10F
05/19 15:19, 10F
→
05/19 15:19, , 11F
05/19 15:19, 11F
→
05/19 15:19, , 12F
05/19 15:19, 12F
推
05/19 15:19, , 13F
05/19 15:19, 13F
→
05/19 15:19, , 14F
05/19 15:19, 14F
推
05/19 15:20, , 15F
05/19 15:20, 15F
推
05/19 15:20, , 16F
05/19 15:20, 16F
→
05/19 15:20, , 17F
05/19 15:20, 17F
→
05/19 15:20, , 18F
05/19 15:20, 18F
推
05/19 15:21, , 19F
05/19 15:21, 19F
→
05/19 15:22, , 20F
05/19 15:22, 20F
→
05/19 15:22, , 21F
05/19 15:22, 21F
噓
05/19 15:23, , 22F
05/19 15:23, 22F
→
05/19 15:23, , 23F
05/19 15:23, 23F
捐錢是美事啊 沒在酸
白痴鄉民邏輯可以好一點嗎?
南韓財團也一直捐錢給政府啊 結果有很乾淨嗎
館長是古道熱血 沒什麼問題
那黑道是不是可以循這樣的模式包養整個警局?
這是制度上的問題
※ 編輯: locosun (36.229.136.107), 05/19/2018 15:29:28
推
05/19 15:23, , 24F
05/19 15:23, 24F
→
05/19 15:24, , 25F
05/19 15:24, 25F
噓
05/19 15:24, , 26F
05/19 15:24, 26F
→
05/19 15:25, , 27F
05/19 15:25, 27F
噓
05/19 15:27, , 28F
05/19 15:27, 28F
噓
05/19 15:28, , 29F
05/19 15:28, 29F
噓
05/19 15:29, , 30F
05/19 15:29, 30F
推
05/19 15:29, , 31F
05/19 15:29, 31F
噓
05/19 15:29, , 32F
05/19 15:29, 32F
噓
05/19 15:32, , 33F
05/19 15:32, 33F
我當然尊重意見不同
我是罵邏輯不通的白癡
噓
05/19 15:34, , 34F
05/19 15:34, 34F
推
05/19 15:34, , 35F
05/19 15:34, 35F
※ 編輯: locosun (36.229.136.107), 05/19/2018 15:35:57
推
05/19 15:38, , 36F
05/19 15:38, 36F
推
05/19 15:39, , 37F
05/19 15:39, 37F
噓
05/19 15:40, , 38F
05/19 15:40, 38F
噓
05/19 15:41, , 39F
05/19 15:41, 39F
賄賂是這種定義?
你的參考書跟試題本我不要了
順便跟我講是哪家補習班跟出版社
太爛了 我千萬不要買到
連我的前文後義都看不懂 還敢讀法律
你確實該把你的書拿去回收了
→
05/19 15:41, , 40F
05/19 15:41, 40F
→
05/19 15:41, , 41F
05/19 15:41, 41F
→
05/19 15:41, , 42F
05/19 15:41, 42F
※ 編輯: locosun (36.229.136.107), 05/19/2018 15:46:10
推
05/19 15:42, , 43F
05/19 15:42, 43F
推
05/19 15:42, , 44F
05/19 15:42, 44F
→
05/19 15:42, , 45F
05/19 15:42, 45F
→
05/19 15:42, , 46F
05/19 15:42, 46F
推
05/19 15:43, , 47F
05/19 15:43, 47F
→
05/19 15:44, , 48F
05/19 15:44, 48F
噓
05/19 15:45, , 49F
05/19 15:45, 49F
噓
05/19 15:48, , 50F
05/19 15:48, 50F
推
05/19 15:50, , 51F
05/19 15:50, 51F
推
05/19 15:51, , 52F
05/19 15:51, 52F
→
05/19 16:15, , 53F
05/19 16:15, 53F
→
05/19 16:18, , 54F
05/19 16:18, 54F
推
05/19 16:42, , 55F
05/19 16:42, 55F
噓
05/19 16:43, , 56F
05/19 16:43, 56F
推
05/19 16:45, , 57F
05/19 16:45, 57F
→
05/19 16:53, , 58F
05/19 16:53, 58F
推
05/19 16:56, , 59F
05/19 16:56, 59F
→
05/19 16:57, , 60F
05/19 16:57, 60F
→
05/19 16:58, , 61F
05/19 16:58, 61F
→
05/19 16:58, , 62F
05/19 16:58, 62F
→
05/19 16:59, , 63F
05/19 16:59, 63F
→
05/19 16:59, , 64F
05/19 16:59, 64F
→
05/19 17:02, , 65F
05/19 17:02, 65F
→
05/19 17:03, , 66F
05/19 17:03, 66F
→
05/19 17:03, , 67F
05/19 17:03, 67F
噓
05/19 17:28, , 68F
05/19 17:28, 68F
噓
05/19 17:36, , 69F
05/19 17:36, 69F
→
05/19 17:57, , 70F
05/19 17:57, 70F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):