[問卦] 把台灣人口增加到2億是不是唯一解?消失
說穿了26也不過就是
靠人口紅利和龐大內需撐起經濟的
台灣現在空屋這麼多
中南東部好多地方都沒人
只要政府補住民眾大爆射大暴生
把台灣人口增加到兩億
這樣內需市場也會起來
就再也不用怕26用經濟威脅我們了
這樣是不是救台灣的唯一解呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.95.252.32
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1510480969.A.466.html
推
11/12 18:03, , 1F
11/12 18:03, 1F
→
11/12 18:03, , 2F
11/12 18:03, 2F
→
11/12 18:03, , 3F
11/12 18:03, 3F
推
11/12 18:03, , 4F
11/12 18:03, 4F
噓
11/12 18:03, , 5F
11/12 18:03, 5F
推
11/12 18:03, , 6F
11/12 18:03, 6F
推
11/12 18:04, , 7F
11/12 18:04, 7F
推
11/12 18:04, , 8F
11/12 18:04, 8F
推
11/12 18:04, , 9F
11/12 18:04, 9F
→
11/12 18:04, , 10F
11/12 18:04, 10F
→
11/12 18:04, , 11F
11/12 18:04, 11F
推
11/12 18:05, , 12F
11/12 18:05, 12F
推
11/12 18:05, , 13F
11/12 18:05, 13F
→
11/12 18:05, , 14F
11/12 18:05, 14F
推
11/12 18:05, , 15F
11/12 18:05, 15F
→
11/12 18:05, , 16F
11/12 18:05, 16F
→
11/12 18:05, , 17F
11/12 18:05, 17F
→
11/12 18:05, , 18F
11/12 18:05, 18F
→
11/12 18:05, , 19F
11/12 18:05, 19F
→
11/12 18:06, , 20F
11/12 18:06, 20F
推
11/12 18:06, , 21F
11/12 18:06, 21F
→
11/12 18:06, , 22F
11/12 18:06, 22F
推
11/12 18:06, , 23F
11/12 18:06, 23F
→
11/12 18:06, , 24F
11/12 18:06, 24F
→
11/12 18:06, , 25F
11/12 18:06, 25F
→
11/12 18:06, , 26F
11/12 18:06, 26F
→
11/12 18:07, , 27F
11/12 18:07, 27F
推
11/12 18:07, , 28F
11/12 18:07, 28F
推
11/12 18:07, , 29F
11/12 18:07, 29F
推
11/12 18:07, , 30F
11/12 18:07, 30F
→
11/12 18:08, , 31F
11/12 18:08, 31F
噓
11/12 18:08, , 32F
11/12 18:08, 32F
→
11/12 18:08, , 33F
11/12 18:08, 33F
噓
11/12 18:08, , 34F
11/12 18:08, 34F
→
11/12 18:08, , 35F
11/12 18:08, 35F
→
11/12 18:08, , 36F
11/12 18:08, 36F
→
11/12 18:08, , 37F
11/12 18:08, 37F
推
11/12 18:08, , 38F
11/12 18:08, 38F
→
11/12 18:09, , 39F
11/12 18:09, 39F
還有 60 則推文
推
11/12 18:50, , 100F
11/12 18:50, 100F
推
11/12 18:50, , 101F
11/12 18:50, 101F
→
11/12 18:52, , 102F
11/12 18:52, 102F
→
11/12 18:52, , 103F
11/12 18:52, 103F
→
11/12 18:53, , 104F
11/12 18:53, 104F
→
11/12 18:53, , 105F
11/12 18:53, 105F
→
11/12 19:03, , 106F
11/12 19:03, 106F
推
11/12 19:10, , 107F
11/12 19:10, 107F
推
11/12 19:14, , 108F
11/12 19:14, 108F
推
11/12 19:21, , 109F
11/12 19:21, 109F
→
11/12 19:22, , 110F
11/12 19:22, 110F
→
11/12 19:22, , 111F
11/12 19:22, 111F
推
11/12 19:23, , 112F
11/12 19:23, 112F
推
11/12 19:23, , 113F
11/12 19:23, 113F
→
11/12 19:23, , 114F
11/12 19:23, 114F
→
11/12 19:44, , 115F
11/12 19:44, 115F
推
11/12 20:00, , 116F
11/12 20:00, 116F
→
11/12 20:35, , 117F
11/12 20:35, 117F
噓
11/12 20:37, , 118F
11/12 20:37, 118F
推
11/12 20:37, , 119F
11/12 20:37, 119F
→
11/12 20:40, , 120F
11/12 20:40, 120F
噓
11/12 20:44, , 121F
11/12 20:44, 121F
→
11/12 21:04, , 122F
11/12 21:04, 122F
推
11/12 21:23, , 123F
11/12 21:23, 123F
推
11/12 21:24, , 124F
11/12 21:24, 124F
噓
11/12 21:37, , 125F
11/12 21:37, 125F
推
11/12 22:11, , 126F
11/12 22:11, 126F
→
11/12 22:11, , 127F
11/12 22:11, 127F
推
11/12 23:17, , 128F
11/12 23:17, 128F
推
11/12 23:17, , 129F
11/12 23:17, 129F
推
11/12 23:37, , 130F
11/12 23:37, 130F
→
11/12 23:41, , 131F
11/12 23:41, 131F
→
11/12 23:41, , 132F
11/12 23:41, 132F
→
11/12 23:42, , 133F
11/12 23:42, 133F
→
11/12 23:43, , 134F
11/12 23:43, 134F
推
11/13 07:45, , 135F
11/13 07:45, 135F
→
11/13 08:11, , 136F
11/13 08:11, 136F
推
11/13 08:28, , 137F
11/13 08:28, 137F
→
11/13 10:34, , 138F
11/13 10:34, 138F
推
11/13 12:30, , 139F
11/13 12:30, 139F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):