Re: [問卦] 為什麼現在要求結婚對象是處女會被罵消失
※ 引述《manysheep (愛與和平的PTT鄉民)》之銘言:
: ※ 引述《TW123456 (將帥無能 累死三軍)》之銘言:
: : 就是不想撿回收 不可以嗎
: 交過男友的
: 但多少女生因此被渣男騙 射後不理 射後被劈腿 後悔不已
所以我說歐美的假女權真的會害死很多女性
我們假設一個渣男插了100個處女好了
依我國法律,他最後還是只能娶一個當老婆
那剩下的99個怎麼辦?其他男的活該回收二手貨嗎?
我講句明白的啦,真心對待女性的,絕對有辦法忍到結婚後在做愛
『因為他要的是你的心,不是妳的肉體』
那些說啥不上床就不愛他,鬧分手的,根本就只是想要女性的身體
而歐洲女權卻「最支持這種把女性玩玩就丟的渣男」
不覺得矛盾嗎?女權不是應該要保護女性嗎?
或許會有女生生氣:「該死的那塊膜」
但是瑞凡,男生在意的不是那塊膜啊,他們不願意去想像你最私密的表情和情緒有其他男
人看過
他們因為愛你,所以希望可以獨佔你最私密的表情和情緒啊
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 163.49.214.152
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1510369953.A.C60.html
→
11/11 11:13, , 1F
11/11 11:13, 1F
推
11/11 11:13, , 2F
11/11 11:13, 2F
推
11/11 11:13, , 3F
11/11 11:13, 3F
推
11/11 11:14, , 4F
11/11 11:14, 4F
→
11/11 11:14, , 5F
11/11 11:14, 5F
→
11/11 11:14, , 6F
11/11 11:14, 6F
推
11/11 11:14, , 7F
11/11 11:14, 7F
→
11/11 11:14, , 8F
11/11 11:14, 8F
推
11/11 11:14, , 9F
11/11 11:14, 9F
噓
11/11 11:15, , 10F
11/11 11:15, 10F
→
11/11 11:15, , 11F
11/11 11:15, 11F
→
11/11 11:15, , 12F
11/11 11:15, 12F
推
11/11 11:16, , 13F
11/11 11:16, 13F
推
11/11 11:16, , 14F
11/11 11:16, 14F
→
11/11 11:16, , 15F
11/11 11:16, 15F
女權最原本的概念是要保障女性的薪水與生活品質,不希望她們被不平等對待
但自從歐美亂曲解之後,機乎就變成性解放(濫交)與自助餐
推
11/11 11:16, , 16F
11/11 11:16, 16F
→
11/11 11:16, , 17F
11/11 11:16, 17F
※ 編輯: Tapqou (163.49.214.152), 11/11/2017 11:19:01
推
11/11 11:17, , 18F
11/11 11:17, 18F
→
11/11 11:19, , 19F
11/11 11:19, 19F
推
11/11 11:19, , 20F
11/11 11:19, 20F
噓
11/11 11:20, , 21F
11/11 11:20, 21F
噓
11/11 11:21, , 22F
11/11 11:21, 22F
推
11/11 11:21, , 23F
11/11 11:21, 23F
→
11/11 11:22, , 24F
11/11 11:22, 24F
推
11/11 11:22, , 25F
11/11 11:22, 25F
噓
11/11 11:23, , 26F
11/11 11:23, 26F
噓
11/11 11:23, , 27F
11/11 11:23, 27F
→
11/11 11:23, , 28F
11/11 11:23, 28F
→
11/11 11:23, , 29F
11/11 11:23, 29F
推
11/11 11:25, , 30F
11/11 11:25, 30F
推
11/11 11:26, , 31F
11/11 11:26, 31F
推
11/11 11:27, , 32F
11/11 11:27, 32F
推
11/11 11:31, , 33F
11/11 11:31, 33F
懂我的核心理念的,會知道我不是在仇女
我只是希望能有更多的女生獲得幸福而已
很多政客把生育率低用經濟當藉口,我敢打包票絕對不是
推
11/11 11:34, , 34F
11/11 11:34, 34F
噓
11/11 11:35, , 35F
11/11 11:35, 35F
推
11/11 11:36, , 36F
11/11 11:36, 36F
還有 67 則推文
還有 6 段內文
→
11/11 13:12, , 104F
11/11 13:12, 104F
噓
11/11 13:19, , 105F
11/11 13:19, 105F
→
11/11 13:19, , 106F
11/11 13:19, 106F
推
11/11 13:26, , 107F
11/11 13:26, 107F
→
11/11 13:28, , 108F
11/11 13:28, 108F
→
11/11 13:28, , 109F
11/11 13:28, 109F
噓
11/11 13:35, , 110F
11/11 13:35, 110F
推
11/11 13:44, , 111F
11/11 13:44, 111F
→
11/11 13:44, , 112F
11/11 13:44, 112F
→
11/11 13:49, , 113F
11/11 13:49, 113F
→
11/11 13:50, , 114F
11/11 13:50, 114F
→
11/11 13:50, , 115F
11/11 13:50, 115F
→
11/11 13:51, , 116F
11/11 13:51, 116F
→
11/11 13:52, , 117F
11/11 13:52, 117F
推
11/11 13:53, , 118F
11/11 13:53, 118F
→
11/11 13:55, , 119F
11/11 13:55, 119F
→
11/11 13:56, , 120F
11/11 13:56, 120F
→
11/11 13:57, , 121F
11/11 13:57, 121F
→
11/11 13:57, , 122F
11/11 13:57, 122F
→
11/11 13:58, , 123F
11/11 13:58, 123F
推
11/11 14:05, , 124F
11/11 14:05, 124F
→
11/11 14:05, , 125F
11/11 14:05, 125F
→
11/11 16:27, , 126F
11/11 16:27, 126F
→
11/11 16:28, , 127F
11/11 16:28, 127F
→
11/11 16:29, , 128F
11/11 16:29, 128F
→
11/11 16:30, , 129F
11/11 16:30, 129F
→
11/11 16:31, , 130F
11/11 16:31, 130F
→
11/11 16:32, , 131F
11/11 16:32, 131F
→
11/11 16:33, , 132F
11/11 16:33, 132F
→
11/11 16:34, , 133F
11/11 16:34, 133F
→
11/11 16:35, , 134F
11/11 16:35, 134F
→
11/11 16:36, , 135F
11/11 16:36, 135F
推
11/11 17:14, , 136F
11/11 17:14, 136F
→
11/11 17:15, , 137F
11/11 17:15, 137F
→
11/11 17:15, , 138F
11/11 17:15, 138F
推
11/11 17:30, , 139F
11/11 17:30, 139F
→
11/11 17:30, , 140F
11/11 17:30, 140F
→
11/11 17:30, , 141F
11/11 17:30, 141F
推
11/11 18:10, , 142F
11/11 18:10, 142F
推
11/14 12:33, , 143F
11/14 12:33, 143F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 7 篇):