[新聞] 「颱風假」入法有望?林美珠:全世界無立法例消失
1.媒體來源:
中天 紀冠宏、邵鈺敏、中時電子報/杜宇喬
2.完整新聞標題:
「颱風假」入法有望?林美珠:全世界無立法例
3.完整新聞內文:
很多勞工颱風天必須冒風雨上班,卻也因此意外頻傳,朝野立委主張讓「颱風假」入法,
也就是員工沒出勤照給薪水,如果出勤,老闆得給雙倍工資,但勞動部長林美珠說,全世
界各國都沒有這樣的立法例子,如果「颱風假」立法,台灣也將獨步全球。
現行颱風天上班給薪不具約束力,員工不出勤,僱主不可扣假但也可不給薪水,就算冒風
雨上班,老闆也不用給加班費。朝野立委主張颱風假入法,1個版本主張颱風天停班,薪
水要照給,出勤者給雙倍工資,另一版本則主張出勤給雙倍工資。
林美珠說,世界主要國家包括美國、加拿大、英國、日本、南韓及香港等都沒有天災發生
時未出勤勞工要照給工資的立法例。林美珠給立委軟釘子,但承諾1個月內召開公聽會,
討論颱風假修法。
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20171019004433-260407
5.備註:
這個討論才是有意義的
終於有一個是為人民著想的立法案件
希望可以如民所願
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.233.124.22
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1508403948.A.83F.html
→
10/19 17:06, , 1F
10/19 17:06, 1F
→
10/19 17:06, , 2F
10/19 17:06, 2F
推
10/19 17:06, , 3F
10/19 17:06, 3F
推
10/19 17:07, , 4F
10/19 17:07, 4F
→
10/19 17:07, , 5F
10/19 17:07, 5F
噓
10/19 17:07, , 6F
10/19 17:07, 6F
→
10/19 17:07, , 7F
10/19 17:07, 7F
→
10/19 17:07, , 8F
10/19 17:07, 8F
→
10/19 17:07, , 9F
10/19 17:07, 9F
推
10/19 17:07, , 10F
10/19 17:07, 10F
噓
10/19 17:07, , 11F
10/19 17:07, 11F
噓
10/19 17:07, , 12F
10/19 17:07, 12F
→
10/19 17:08, , 13F
10/19 17:08, 13F
→
10/19 17:08, , 14F
10/19 17:08, 14F
→
10/19 17:08, , 15F
10/19 17:08, 15F
→
10/19 17:09, , 16F
10/19 17:09, 16F
推
10/19 17:09, , 17F
10/19 17:09, 17F
→
10/19 17:09, , 18F
10/19 17:09, 18F
推
10/19 17:09, , 19F
10/19 17:09, 19F
噓
10/19 17:09, , 20F
10/19 17:09, 20F
→
10/19 17:09, , 21F
10/19 17:09, 21F
推
10/19 17:09, , 22F
10/19 17:09, 22F
推
10/19 17:10, , 23F
10/19 17:10, 23F
推
10/19 17:10, , 24F
10/19 17:10, 24F
推
10/19 17:10, , 25F
10/19 17:10, 25F
噓
10/19 17:10, , 26F
10/19 17:10, 26F
噓
10/19 17:10, , 27F
10/19 17:10, 27F
推
10/19 17:11, , 28F
10/19 17:11, 28F
→
10/19 17:11, , 29F
10/19 17:11, 29F
推
10/19 17:11, , 30F
10/19 17:11, 30F
→
10/19 17:12, , 31F
10/19 17:12, 31F
推
10/19 17:12, , 32F
10/19 17:12, 32F
→
10/19 17:12, , 33F
10/19 17:12, 33F
→
10/19 17:12, , 34F
10/19 17:12, 34F
推
10/19 17:12, , 35F
10/19 17:12, 35F
→
10/19 17:12, , 36F
10/19 17:12, 36F
→
10/19 17:13, , 37F
10/19 17:13, 37F
噓
10/19 17:14, , 38F
10/19 17:14, 38F
推
10/19 17:15, , 39F
10/19 17:15, 39F
噓
10/19 17:15, , 40F
10/19 17:15, 40F
→
10/19 17:15, , 41F
10/19 17:15, 41F
→
10/19 17:16, , 42F
10/19 17:16, 42F
→
10/19 17:16, , 43F
10/19 17:16, 43F
→
10/19 17:17, , 44F
10/19 17:17, 44F
推
10/19 17:17, , 45F
10/19 17:17, 45F
噓
10/19 17:17, , 46F
10/19 17:17, 46F
噓
10/19 17:19, , 47F
10/19 17:19, 47F
噓
10/19 17:21, , 48F
10/19 17:21, 48F
噓
10/19 17:26, , 49F
10/19 17:26, 49F
噓
10/19 17:30, , 50F
10/19 17:30, 50F
→
10/19 17:32, , 51F
10/19 17:32, 51F
噓
10/19 17:39, , 52F
10/19 17:39, 52F
噓
10/19 17:41, , 53F
10/19 17:41, 53F
噓
10/19 17:47, , 54F
10/19 17:47, 54F
噓
10/19 17:50, , 55F
10/19 17:50, 55F
噓
10/19 17:55, , 56F
10/19 17:55, 56F
噓
10/19 17:56, , 57F
10/19 17:56, 57F
→
10/19 18:00, , 58F
10/19 18:00, 58F
推
10/19 18:22, , 59F
10/19 18:22, 59F
噓
10/19 18:23, , 60F
10/19 18:23, 60F
→
10/19 18:25, , 61F
10/19 18:25, 61F
推
10/19 18:26, , 62F
10/19 18:26, 62F
推
10/19 18:26, , 63F
10/19 18:26, 63F
→
10/19 18:28, , 64F
10/19 18:28, 64F
推
10/19 18:29, , 65F
10/19 18:29, 65F
噓
10/19 18:48, , 66F
10/19 18:48, 66F
噓
10/19 18:53, , 67F
10/19 18:53, 67F
噓
10/19 19:11, , 68F
10/19 19:11, 68F
推
10/19 19:18, , 69F
10/19 19:18, 69F
推
10/19 19:24, , 70F
10/19 19:24, 70F
噓
10/19 19:43, , 71F
10/19 19:43, 71F
噓
10/19 19:54, , 72F
10/19 19:54, 72F
噓
10/19 20:51, , 73F
10/19 20:51, 73F
噓
10/19 22:10, , 74F
10/19 22:10, 74F
→
10/19 22:18, , 75F
10/19 22:18, 75F
→
10/19 22:37, , 76F
10/19 22:37, 76F
推
10/19 22:42, , 77F
10/19 22:42, 77F
→
10/19 22:42, , 78F
10/19 22:42, 78F
噓
10/19 22:42, , 79F
10/19 22:42, 79F
噓
10/19 22:56, , 80F
10/19 22:56, 80F
噓
10/19 23:00, , 81F
10/19 23:00, 81F
噓
10/19 23:01, , 82F
10/19 23:01, 82F
噓
10/19 23:17, , 83F
10/19 23:17, 83F
噓
10/20 01:41, , 84F
10/20 01:41, 84F
噓
10/20 01:58, , 85F
10/20 01:58, 85F
→
10/20 10:38, , 86F
10/20 10:38, 86F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):