[新聞] 張哲生不滿雙十條幅沒國旗!他列歷年標誌酸中華美學消失
1.媒體來源:
http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/2213073
2.完整新聞標題:
張哲生不滿雙十條幅沒國旗!他列歷年標誌酸中華美學
3.完整新聞內文:
http://img.ltn.com.tw/Upload/liveNews/BigPic/600_phpujlkQA.jpg
今年採用三彩雙十圖。(圖擷取自中華文化總會)
〔即時新聞/綜合報導〕被封為「懷舊達人」的製作人張哲生因不滿街頭慶祝的條幅沒有
國旗,引起網友不同看法。臉書粉絲團《小聖蚊的治國日記》則列出2012年到2017年代表
國慶日的標誌反酸回去!
http://img.ltn.com.tw/Upload/liveNews/BigPic/600_php1RI5bW.png
《小聖蚊的治國日記》則列出2012年到2017年代表國慶日的標誌反酸。(圖由小聖蚊的治
國日記提供)
張哲生在臉書上表示,在街頭看到政府用這種號稱具有創意的旗幟來慶祝中華民國的生日
,深深覺得不如單純掛上青天白日滿地紅的中華民國國旗,既簡單明瞭又有意義,不是嗎
?「中華民國在國際賽事上被迫使用會旗取代國旗是逼不得已,為什麼政府在自己的國土
上還要弄一個三彩雙十圖樣來取代國旗呢?」
http://img.ltn.com.tw/Upload/liveNews/BigPic/600_php0cv3tJ.jpg
張哲生在臉書發文,並質疑三彩雙十圖。(圖擷取自張哲生)
這樣的言論引起討論,《小聖蚊的治國日記》則列出2012年到2017國慶日的標誌,並諷
刺張哲生「我猜張哲生們的崩潰點應該在於沒有使用中華民國美學吧」、「其實是2016分
水嶺,有眼睛的都知道哪些設計好」。
網友紛紛感嘆,「原來前面那麼ㄘㄡˇ噢!(驚)」、「以前的應該是俗到直接忽略」,
還有網友把焦點放在2014年的標誌,「2014有夠不要臉」。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 175.180.170.100
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1507097741.A.DA9.html
→
10/04 14:15, , 1F
10/04 14:15, 1F
※ 編輯: proprome (175.180.170.100), 10/04/2017 14:16:53
推
10/04 14:18, , 2F
10/04 14:18, 2F
→
10/04 14:18, , 3F
10/04 14:18, 3F
推
10/04 14:18, , 4F
10/04 14:18, 4F
推
10/04 14:18, , 5F
10/04 14:18, 5F
推
10/04 14:19, , 6F
10/04 14:19, 6F
推
10/04 14:19, , 7F
10/04 14:19, 7F
推
10/04 14:20, , 8F
10/04 14:20, 8F
推
10/04 14:20, , 9F
10/04 14:20, 9F
推
10/04 14:21, , 10F
10/04 14:21, 10F
→
10/04 14:21, , 11F
10/04 14:21, 11F
→
10/04 14:22, , 12F
10/04 14:22, 12F
推
10/04 14:22, , 13F
10/04 14:22, 13F
→
10/04 14:22, , 14F
10/04 14:22, 14F
→
10/04 14:23, , 15F
10/04 14:23, 15F
推
10/04 14:23, , 16F
10/04 14:23, 16F
推
10/04 14:23, , 17F
10/04 14:23, 17F
推
10/04 14:23, , 18F
10/04 14:23, 18F
→
10/04 14:23, , 19F
10/04 14:23, 19F
推
10/04 14:23, , 20F
10/04 14:23, 20F
推
10/04 14:23, , 21F
10/04 14:23, 21F
→
10/04 14:24, , 22F
10/04 14:24, 22F
→
10/04 14:24, , 23F
10/04 14:24, 23F
→
10/04 14:24, , 24F
10/04 14:24, 24F
→
10/04 14:24, , 25F
10/04 14:24, 25F
→
10/04 14:25, , 26F
10/04 14:25, 26F
推
10/04 14:25, , 27F
10/04 14:25, 27F
推
10/04 14:26, , 28F
10/04 14:26, 28F
推
10/04 14:26, , 29F
10/04 14:26, 29F
→
10/04 14:27, , 30F
10/04 14:27, 30F
推
10/04 14:27, , 31F
10/04 14:27, 31F
噓
10/04 14:27, , 32F
10/04 14:27, 32F
→
10/04 14:27, , 33F
10/04 14:27, 33F
推
10/04 14:28, , 34F
10/04 14:28, 34F
噓
10/04 14:28, , 35F
10/04 14:28, 35F
推
10/04 14:29, , 36F
10/04 14:29, 36F
推
10/04 14:29, , 37F
10/04 14:29, 37F
推
10/04 14:30, , 38F
10/04 14:30, 38F
還有 128 則推文
→
10/04 19:43, , 167F
10/04 19:43, 167F
推
10/04 19:53, , 168F
10/04 19:53, 168F
推
10/04 19:54, , 169F
10/04 19:54, 169F
噓
10/04 19:57, , 170F
10/04 19:57, 170F
推
10/04 20:04, , 171F
10/04 20:04, 171F
推
10/04 20:08, , 172F
10/04 20:08, 172F
推
10/04 20:10, , 173F
10/04 20:10, 173F
推
10/04 20:37, , 174F
10/04 20:37, 174F
推
10/04 20:39, , 175F
10/04 20:39, 175F
推
10/04 20:41, , 176F
10/04 20:41, 176F
推
10/04 20:44, , 177F
10/04 20:44, 177F
→
10/04 20:44, , 178F
10/04 20:44, 178F
推
10/04 21:07, , 179F
10/04 21:07, 179F
→
10/04 21:08, , 180F
10/04 21:08, 180F
推
10/04 21:17, , 181F
10/04 21:17, 181F
噓
10/04 21:27, , 182F
10/04 21:27, 182F
推
10/04 21:40, , 183F
10/04 21:40, 183F
→
10/04 21:40, , 184F
10/04 21:40, 184F
推
10/04 21:48, , 185F
10/04 21:48, 185F
推
10/04 22:04, , 186F
10/04 22:04, 186F
推
10/04 22:35, , 187F
10/04 22:35, 187F
推
10/04 22:37, , 188F
10/04 22:37, 188F
推
10/04 22:51, , 189F
10/04 22:51, 189F
推
10/04 23:05, , 190F
10/04 23:05, 190F
推
10/04 23:45, , 191F
10/04 23:45, 191F
推
10/05 01:42, , 192F
10/05 01:42, 192F
推
10/05 01:53, , 193F
10/05 01:53, 193F
推
10/05 04:24, , 194F
10/05 04:24, 194F
→
10/05 07:50, , 195F
10/05 07:50, 195F
推
10/05 08:53, , 196F
10/05 08:53, 196F
推
10/05 11:21, , 197F
10/05 11:21, 197F
推
10/05 11:26, , 198F
10/05 11:26, 198F
噓
10/05 12:20, , 199F
10/05 12:20, 199F
推
10/05 12:34, , 200F
10/05 12:34, 200F
推
10/05 12:57, , 201F
10/05 12:57, 201F
推
10/05 13:05, , 202F
10/05 13:05, 202F
→
10/05 13:12, , 203F
10/05 13:12, 203F
→
10/05 13:13, , 204F
10/05 13:13, 204F
推
10/05 17:32, , 205F
10/05 17:32, 205F
推
10/06 01:30, , 206F
10/06 01:30, 206F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):