[問卦] 老一輩這種觀念是不是害慘許多人?消失
現代社會,舉凡自閉、過動、智能障礙、發展障礙甚至精神疾病等
如果有被及時診斷
再經由醫療院所、相關社福團體等支援及協助,
透過藥物治療或復健等途徑,便可獲得改善,
家屬也能在專業人士協助下,減輕許多負擔。
然而某些老人家
覺得這些病症講出去丟人現眼
秉持著家醜不可外揚的信念
禁止家屬或其他人帶去就醫
不僅耽誤了患者本身,也害負責照顧的家人超級辛苦。
本魯同學在幼兒園工作,
班級裡有位明顯動作發展遲緩的孩子
在班上也容易被其他同學欺負
聽說祖母就是死也不肯帶去就醫
她堅信小孩沒有問題,是媽媽不懂得照顧所造成的
等小孩長大了自然就會好(WTF?)
這種觀念是否害慘許多人?有沒有卦?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.159.100.182
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1506762597.A.488.html
推
09/30 17:10, , 1F
09/30 17:10, 1F
→
09/30 17:10, , 2F
09/30 17:10, 2F
推
09/30 17:10, , 3F
09/30 17:10, 3F
→
09/30 17:10, , 4F
09/30 17:10, 4F
→
09/30 17:10, , 5F
09/30 17:10, 5F
推
09/30 17:10, , 6F
09/30 17:10, 6F
推
09/30 17:10, , 7F
09/30 17:10, 7F
→
09/30 17:11, , 8F
09/30 17:11, 8F
推
09/30 17:11, , 9F
09/30 17:11, 9F
推
09/30 17:12, , 10F
09/30 17:12, 10F
推
09/30 17:12, , 11F
09/30 17:12, 11F
推
09/30 17:12, , 12F
09/30 17:12, 12F
推
09/30 17:13, , 13F
09/30 17:13, 13F
→
09/30 17:13, , 14F
09/30 17:13, 14F
→
09/30 17:14, , 15F
09/30 17:14, 15F
推
09/30 17:16, , 16F
09/30 17:16, 16F
推
09/30 17:18, , 17F
09/30 17:18, 17F
→
09/30 17:18, , 18F
09/30 17:18, 18F
推
09/30 17:19, , 19F
09/30 17:19, 19F
推
09/30 17:20, , 20F
09/30 17:20, 20F
推
09/30 17:20, , 21F
09/30 17:20, 21F
噓
09/30 17:21, , 22F
09/30 17:21, 22F
→
09/30 17:22, , 23F
09/30 17:22, 23F
→
09/30 17:22, , 24F
09/30 17:22, 24F
推
09/30 17:22, , 25F
09/30 17:22, 25F
→
09/30 17:23, , 26F
09/30 17:23, 26F
噓
09/30 17:24, , 27F
09/30 17:24, 27F
推
09/30 17:24, , 28F
09/30 17:24, 28F
→
09/30 17:25, , 29F
09/30 17:25, 29F
推
09/30 17:27, , 30F
09/30 17:27, 30F
推
09/30 17:27, , 31F
09/30 17:27, 31F
推
09/30 17:30, , 32F
09/30 17:30, 32F
推
09/30 17:30, , 33F
09/30 17:30, 33F
→
09/30 17:30, , 34F
09/30 17:30, 34F
推
09/30 17:34, , 35F
09/30 17:34, 35F
推
09/30 17:35, , 36F
09/30 17:35, 36F
推
09/30 17:35, , 37F
09/30 17:35, 37F
→
09/30 17:35, , 38F
09/30 17:35, 38F
→
09/30 17:36, , 39F
09/30 17:36, 39F
→
09/30 17:36, , 40F
09/30 17:36, 40F
→
09/30 17:37, , 41F
09/30 17:37, 41F
→
09/30 17:37, , 42F
09/30 17:37, 42F
推
09/30 17:38, , 43F
09/30 17:38, 43F
→
09/30 17:39, , 44F
09/30 17:39, 44F
→
09/30 17:39, , 45F
09/30 17:39, 45F
→
09/30 17:39, , 46F
09/30 17:39, 46F
→
09/30 17:40, , 47F
09/30 17:40, 47F
推
09/30 17:42, , 48F
09/30 17:42, 48F
→
09/30 17:42, , 49F
09/30 17:42, 49F
→
09/30 17:43, , 50F
09/30 17:43, 50F
→
09/30 17:45, , 51F
09/30 17:45, 51F
→
09/30 17:48, , 52F
09/30 17:48, 52F
推
09/30 17:51, , 53F
09/30 17:51, 53F
推
09/30 17:51, , 54F
09/30 17:51, 54F
推
09/30 17:52, , 55F
09/30 17:52, 55F
推
09/30 17:58, , 56F
09/30 17:58, 56F
推
09/30 18:04, , 57F
09/30 18:04, 57F
→
09/30 18:10, , 58F
09/30 18:10, 58F
推
09/30 18:11, , 59F
09/30 18:11, 59F
→
09/30 18:19, , 60F
09/30 18:19, 60F
推
09/30 18:35, , 61F
09/30 18:35, 61F
推
09/30 18:38, , 62F
09/30 18:38, 62F
→
09/30 18:39, , 63F
09/30 18:39, 63F
推
09/30 18:50, , 64F
09/30 18:50, 64F
推
09/30 18:53, , 65F
09/30 18:53, 65F
→
09/30 19:11, , 66F
09/30 19:11, 66F
→
09/30 19:18, , 67F
09/30 19:18, 67F
推
09/30 19:28, , 68F
09/30 19:28, 68F
推
09/30 19:59, , 69F
09/30 19:59, 69F
噓
09/30 20:19, , 70F
09/30 20:19, 70F
→
09/30 20:22, , 71F
09/30 20:22, 71F
推
09/30 20:24, , 72F
09/30 20:24, 72F
推
09/30 20:25, , 73F
09/30 20:25, 73F
→
09/30 20:25, , 74F
09/30 20:25, 74F
推
09/30 20:29, , 75F
09/30 20:29, 75F
→
09/30 20:36, , 76F
09/30 20:36, 76F
推
09/30 20:53, , 77F
09/30 20:53, 77F
推
09/30 21:30, , 78F
09/30 21:30, 78F
推
09/30 22:31, , 79F
09/30 22:31, 79F
推
10/01 04:01, , 80F
10/01 04:01, 80F
→
10/01 04:01, , 81F
10/01 04:01, 81F
推
10/01 15:44, , 82F
10/01 15:44, 82F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):