[問卦] 為什麼有人可以在中天旺報工作?消失
常常看到很多旺報或是中天的記者
倒不是說立場或是政黨的問題
而是在寫文章的時候根本就不知道在寫三小
無中生有或是完全的偏頗
可是卻依然可以生存下去
三中案過去之後
也沒有看到有誰出來抵制幹嘛的
這些記者不是好歹也讀過大學
也是台灣人
到底怎麼可以做到的
真的很了不起
是中天旺報給的薪水比較高
還是說其實只要對岸多一些這種公司過來施捨台灣人工作
台灣人也可以很快適應兩岸一家親的生活模式
有八卦嗎?
※ 八卦板務請到 GossipPicket 檢舉板詢問
※ a.張貼問卦請注意,充實文章內容、是否有專板,本板並非萬能問板。
※ b.一天只能張貼 "兩則" 問卦,自刪及被刪也算兩篇之內,
※ 超貼者將被水桶,請注意!
※ c.本看板嚴格禁止政治問卦,發文問卦前請先仔細閱讀相關板規。
※ d.未滿30繁體中文字視同鬧板,請注意!
※ (↑看完提醒請刪除ctrl + y)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 73.75.45.232
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1505347663.A.196.html
噓
09/14 08:08, , 1F
09/14 08:08, 1F
噓
09/14 08:08, , 2F
09/14 08:08, 2F
→
09/14 08:08, , 3F
09/14 08:08, 3F
→
09/14 08:08, , 4F
09/14 08:08, 4F
推
09/14 08:08, , 5F
09/14 08:08, 5F
到底是給了多少錢才可以寫出這種東西
非常好奇
※ 編輯: GrandTOTORO (73.75.45.232), 09/14/2017 08:09:37
噓
09/14 08:09, , 6F
09/14 08:09, 6F
→
09/14 08:09, , 7F
09/14 08:09, 7F
噓
09/14 08:09, , 8F
09/14 08:09, 8F
→
09/14 08:09, , 9F
09/14 08:09, 9F
噓
09/14 08:09, , 10F
09/14 08:09, 10F
推
09/14 08:09, , 11F
09/14 08:09, 11F
→
09/14 08:09, , 12F
09/14 08:09, 12F
推
09/14 08:09, , 13F
09/14 08:09, 13F
→
09/14 08:10, , 14F
09/14 08:10, 14F
噓
09/14 08:10, , 15F
09/14 08:10, 15F
→
09/14 08:10, , 16F
09/14 08:10, 16F
→
09/14 08:10, , 17F
09/14 08:10, 17F
推
09/14 08:11, , 18F
09/14 08:11, 18F
→
09/14 08:11, , 19F
09/14 08:11, 19F
→
09/14 08:11, , 20F
09/14 08:11, 20F
噓
09/14 08:11, , 21F
09/14 08:11, 21F
→
09/14 08:11, , 22F
09/14 08:11, 22F
→
09/14 08:11, , 23F
09/14 08:11, 23F
→
09/14 08:11, , 24F
09/14 08:11, 24F
→
09/14 08:11, , 25F
09/14 08:11, 25F
推
09/14 08:12, , 26F
09/14 08:12, 26F
→
09/14 08:13, , 27F
09/14 08:13, 27F
推
09/14 08:13, , 28F
09/14 08:13, 28F
→
09/14 08:14, , 29F
09/14 08:14, 29F
噓
09/14 08:15, , 30F
09/14 08:15, 30F
推
09/14 08:15, , 31F
09/14 08:15, 31F
噓
09/14 08:15, , 32F
09/14 08:15, 32F
推
09/14 08:16, , 33F
09/14 08:16, 33F
推
09/14 08:16, , 34F
09/14 08:16, 34F
→
09/14 08:18, , 35F
09/14 08:18, 35F
→
09/14 08:18, , 36F
09/14 08:18, 36F
推
09/14 08:18, , 37F
09/14 08:18, 37F
噓
09/14 08:19, , 38F
09/14 08:19, 38F
→
09/14 08:19, , 39F
09/14 08:19, 39F
→
09/14 08:20, , 40F
09/14 08:20, 40F
噓
09/14 08:20, , 41F
09/14 08:20, 41F
→
09/14 08:21, , 42F
09/14 08:21, 42F
推
09/14 08:22, , 43F
09/14 08:22, 43F
→
09/14 08:22, , 44F
09/14 08:22, 44F
噓
09/14 08:22, , 45F
09/14 08:22, 45F
噓
09/14 08:24, , 46F
09/14 08:24, 46F
噓
09/14 08:26, , 47F
09/14 08:26, 47F
噓
09/14 08:27, , 48F
09/14 08:27, 48F
噓
09/14 08:27, , 49F
09/14 08:27, 49F
噓
09/14 08:28, , 50F
09/14 08:28, 50F
推
09/14 08:46, , 51F
09/14 08:46, 51F
推
09/14 10:27, , 52F
09/14 10:27, 52F
→
09/14 11:03, , 53F
09/14 11:03, 53F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):