[問卦] 桃園是不是六都最令人傻眼的直轄市消失
台北 台中 高雄 台南道路規劃都很猛
大多有棋盤式設計的影子 台中環狀開發也不錯路大條多了
新北人口爆多,工作機會也多
反觀桃園,路小市容超級醜
之前在桃園待10年有了,終於可以離開了
我都很訝異桃園算是直轄市..
道路真的小到不行,根本沒有人行道可以
更何況腳踏車騎起來超威險
整個城市到處住宅混著工廠
污染嚴重,研發軟體 金融業沒有
這種第三世界為什麼還能一直當直轄市啊?
我自己是覺得桃園本身沒條件沒資格當直轄市啦
花好多錢 開發成這樣..
如果把錢給之前的省轄市台中新竹可能都飛天了吧..
桃園是六都直轄市中最令人傻眼的嗎
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.71.103.94
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1505310013.A.182.html
→
09/13 21:40, , 1F
09/13 21:40, 1F
推
09/13 21:41, , 2F
09/13 21:41, 2F
推
09/13 21:41, , 3F
09/13 21:41, 3F
推
09/13 21:41, , 4F
09/13 21:41, 4F
→
09/13 21:41, , 5F
09/13 21:41, 5F
→
09/13 21:41, , 6F
09/13 21:41, 6F
→
09/13 21:41, , 7F
09/13 21:41, 7F
→
09/13 21:41, , 8F
09/13 21:41, 8F
→
09/13 21:41, , 9F
09/13 21:41, 9F
→
09/13 21:41, , 10F
09/13 21:41, 10F
→
09/13 21:42, , 11F
09/13 21:42, 11F
推
09/13 21:42, , 12F
09/13 21:42, 12F
推
09/13 21:43, , 13F
09/13 21:43, 13F
推
09/13 21:43, , 14F
09/13 21:43, 14F
噓
09/13 21:44, , 15F
09/13 21:44, 15F
→
09/13 21:45, , 16F
09/13 21:45, 16F
噓
09/13 21:45, , 17F
09/13 21:45, 17F
噓
09/13 21:45, , 18F
09/13 21:45, 18F
推
09/13 21:45, , 19F
09/13 21:45, 19F

→
09/13 21:46, , 20F
09/13 21:46, 20F
→
09/13 21:46, , 21F
09/13 21:46, 21F
→
09/13 21:47, , 22F
09/13 21:47, 22F
噓
09/13 21:47, , 23F
09/13 21:47, 23F
推
09/13 21:48, , 24F
09/13 21:48, 24F
→
09/13 21:48, , 25F
09/13 21:48, 25F
噓
09/13 21:48, , 26F
09/13 21:48, 26F
→
09/13 21:50, , 27F
09/13 21:50, 27F
→
09/13 21:50, , 28F
09/13 21:50, 28F
噓
09/13 21:50, , 29F
09/13 21:50, 29F
→
09/13 21:50, , 30F
09/13 21:50, 30F
噓
09/13 21:51, , 31F
09/13 21:51, 31F
→
09/13 21:51, , 32F
09/13 21:51, 32F
→
09/13 21:51, , 33F
09/13 21:51, 33F
→
09/13 21:52, , 34F
09/13 21:52, 34F
噓
09/13 21:52, , 35F
09/13 21:52, 35F
推
09/13 21:54, , 36F
09/13 21:54, 36F
噓
09/13 21:55, , 37F
09/13 21:55, 37F
噓
09/13 21:55, , 38F
09/13 21:55, 38F
→
09/13 21:55, , 39F
09/13 21:55, 39F
→
09/13 21:55, , 40F
09/13 21:55, 40F
→
09/13 21:57, , 41F
09/13 21:57, 41F
噓
09/13 22:02, , 42F
09/13 22:02, 42F
噓
09/13 22:07, , 43F
09/13 22:07, 43F
→
09/13 22:08, , 44F
09/13 22:08, 44F
→
09/13 22:16, , 45F
09/13 22:16, 45F
推
09/13 22:18, , 46F
09/13 22:18, 46F
推
09/13 22:26, , 47F
09/13 22:26, 47F
→
09/13 22:32, , 48F
09/13 22:32, 48F
推
09/13 22:41, , 49F
09/13 22:41, 49F
→
09/13 23:09, , 50F
09/13 23:09, 50F
推
09/13 23:19, , 51F
09/13 23:19, 51F
噓
09/14 00:01, , 52F
09/14 00:01, 52F
推
09/14 00:02, , 53F
09/14 00:02, 53F
→
09/14 00:02, , 54F
09/14 00:02, 54F

→
09/14 00:03, , 55F
09/14 00:03, 55F

→
09/14 00:03, , 56F
09/14 00:03, 56F

→
09/14 00:03, , 57F
09/14 00:03, 57F
推
09/14 00:35, , 58F
09/14 00:35, 58F
噓
12/30 23:53, , 59F
12/30 23:53, 59F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):