[新聞] Python為高收入國家最受歡迎的語言消失
1.媒體來源: iThome
2.完整新聞標題:
程式語言調查:Python為高收入國家最受歡迎的語言
3.完整新聞內文:
開發者論壇Stack Overflow根據論壇中的tags判斷程式語言受歡迎的程度,整體而言,前
三大受歡迎的語言為Javascript、Python、Java,而在高收入國家,Python已躍居第一,
其次是Javascript、Java。
開發者論壇Stack Overflow上週指出,Python已成為高收入國家成長最快也最受歡迎的程
式語言。
1991年誕生的Python為一物件導向的直譯式程式語言,它有一組可輕鬆完成常見任務的標
準庫且語法簡單,這幾年愈來愈受全球開發者青睞。
Stack Overflow是根據世界銀行(World Bank)的定義來篩選高收入國家,涵蓋美國、英
國、德國、加拿大及台灣等逾70個國家,同時觀察這些國家的程式語言發展狀況,再與全
球比較。且這些高收入國家約佔Stack Overflow流量的64%。
由於Stack Overflow為一開發者論壇,因此相關的調查都是仰賴論壇中所出現的標籤數(
tags)來判斷程式語言的受歡迎程度,根據今年5月的調查(下圖,來源:Stack
Overflow),全球最受歡迎的程式語言依序是Javascript、Python、Java、PHP、C#與C++
。
https://imgur.com/2bWDq8C.jpg

然而,在高收入國家中,Python才是最受歡迎的程式語言,Javascript則排名第二,其他
依序是Java、C#、PHP與C++。
https://imgur.com/iBbBewE.jpg

若只觀察那些非高收入的國家,前六大程式語言的排序則是Javascript、Java、C#、PHP
、Python與C++。
https://imgur.com/qwcVGlg.jpg

Stack Overflow說,Python是在今年6月成為該站最多高收入國家開發者所造訪的標籤,
從2012年迄今,造訪Python標籤的數量成長了2.5倍。
其實不管是高收入國家或是開發中國家都可看到Python語言的快速成長,只是Python已名
列高收入國家的最受歡迎語言。
雖然還有其他程式語言在高收入國家的成長速度快過Python,像是Rust、Go及R等,但因
這些語言原本的使用人數就少,因此未被Stack Overflow納入計算。
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
http://www.ithome.com.tw/news/116783
5.備註:
戰程式語言囉!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 58.115.109.218
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1505146544.A.221.html
推
09/12 00:16, , 1F
09/12 00:16, 1F
推
09/12 00:16, , 2F
09/12 00:16, 2F
推
09/12 00:17, , 3F
09/12 00:17, 3F
推
09/12 00:17, , 4F
09/12 00:17, 4F
推
09/12 00:17, , 5F
09/12 00:17, 5F
推
09/12 00:17, , 6F
09/12 00:17, 6F
推
09/12 00:17, , 7F
09/12 00:17, 7F
推
09/12 00:17, , 8F
09/12 00:17, 8F
推
09/12 00:18, , 9F
09/12 00:18, 9F
推
09/12 00:20, , 10F
09/12 00:20, 10F
推
09/12 00:21, , 11F
09/12 00:21, 11F
推
09/12 00:21, , 12F
09/12 00:21, 12F
推
09/12 00:22, , 13F
09/12 00:22, 13F
推
09/12 00:23, , 14F
09/12 00:23, 14F
→
09/12 00:24, , 15F
09/12 00:24, 15F
→
09/12 00:24, , 16F
09/12 00:24, 16F
推
09/12 00:25, , 17F
09/12 00:25, 17F
推
09/12 00:26, , 18F
09/12 00:26, 18F
噓
09/12 00:27, , 19F
09/12 00:27, 19F
推
09/12 00:28, , 20F
09/12 00:28, 20F
噓
09/12 00:29, , 21F
09/12 00:29, 21F
推
09/12 00:30, , 22F
09/12 00:30, 22F
推
09/12 00:30, , 23F
09/12 00:30, 23F
→
09/12 00:37, , 24F
09/12 00:37, 24F
噓
09/12 00:37, , 25F
09/12 00:37, 25F
推
09/12 00:38, , 26F
09/12 00:38, 26F
推
09/12 00:40, , 27F
09/12 00:40, 27F
推
09/12 00:42, , 28F
09/12 00:42, 28F
推
09/12 00:43, , 29F
09/12 00:43, 29F
→
09/12 00:45, , 30F
09/12 00:45, 30F
→
09/12 00:46, , 31F
09/12 00:46, 31F
推
09/12 00:47, , 32F
09/12 00:47, 32F
→
09/12 00:49, , 33F
09/12 00:49, 33F
→
09/12 00:50, , 34F
09/12 00:50, 34F
推
09/12 00:50, , 35F
09/12 00:50, 35F
推
09/12 00:51, , 36F
09/12 00:51, 36F
推
09/12 00:56, , 37F
09/12 00:56, 37F
→
09/12 00:56, , 38F
09/12 00:56, 38F
推
09/12 00:58, , 39F
09/12 00:58, 39F
推
09/12 01:13, , 40F
09/12 01:13, 40F
推
09/12 01:14, , 41F
09/12 01:14, 41F
→
09/12 01:14, , 42F
09/12 01:14, 42F
推
09/12 01:16, , 43F
09/12 01:16, 43F
推
09/12 01:17, , 44F
09/12 01:17, 44F
推
09/12 01:18, , 45F
09/12 01:18, 45F
→
09/12 01:19, , 46F
09/12 01:19, 46F
→
09/12 01:19, , 47F
09/12 01:19, 47F
→
09/12 01:19, , 48F
09/12 01:19, 48F
推
09/12 01:24, , 49F
09/12 01:24, 49F
推
09/12 01:26, , 50F
09/12 01:26, 50F
推
09/12 01:26, , 51F
09/12 01:26, 51F
推
09/12 01:50, , 52F
09/12 01:50, 52F
推
09/12 01:51, , 53F
09/12 01:51, 53F
推
09/12 02:08, , 54F
09/12 02:08, 54F
推
09/12 02:17, , 55F
09/12 02:17, 55F
推
09/12 02:47, , 56F
09/12 02:47, 56F
推
09/12 03:00, , 57F
09/12 03:00, 57F
推
09/12 03:52, , 58F
09/12 03:52, 58F
推
09/12 04:17, , 59F
09/12 04:17, 59F
推
09/12 05:40, , 60F
09/12 05:40, 60F
推
09/12 06:34, , 61F
09/12 06:34, 61F
推
09/12 07:44, , 62F
09/12 07:44, 62F
推
09/12 07:47, , 63F
09/12 07:47, 63F

噓
09/12 08:11, , 64F
09/12 08:11, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):