[新聞] 北韓氫彈若在首爾引爆 估200萬人罹難消失
1.媒體來源:
奇摩新聞
2.完整新聞標題:
北韓氫彈若在首爾引爆 估200萬人罹難
3.完整新聞內文:
北韓三日試爆的核武(宣稱為氫彈)假如在南韓首都首爾引爆,估計將有兩百萬人罹難。
南韓朝鮮日報報導,北韓每次核試爆的威力都比前一次要強。美國國防部一九九八年以廣
島原爆的威力模擬首爾與市中心駐韓美軍龍山基地遇襲的情況,結果顯示方圓一百五十公
尺內的建物將被摧毀、方圓一點五公里內的民眾將遭到三度灼傷,預估六十二萬人喪命,
廣島原爆則造成十三萬五千人死亡。北韓在二○○六年才首度進行地下核試爆。
廣島原爆的威力相當於一點五萬噸黃色炸藥,北韓最新一次核試爆的當量預估在五萬到十
萬噸黃色炸藥之間。南韓估五萬噸,美國、中國大陸與日本都估十萬噸。朝鮮日報指出,
南韓政府經常低估北韓核試爆的威力。
北韓若以五萬噸當量核武攻擊首爾且在上空一百公里位置爆炸,電磁脈衝(EMP)將癱瘓
所有電子儀器。
南韓中央日報報導,二○一五年,韓國技術研究所公布分析結果,表示如果十萬噸當量的
核彈在首爾一百公里上空爆炸,將可破壞韓半島和周邊國家所有的電子儀器。
前國防大學教授權容守表示,「如果高度降低為六十至七十公里區間,則韓半島南部地區
(南韓全境)均會產生EMP效果。」
權容守分析,如果北韓攻擊美國,將核彈在四百公里的高空引爆,即可對美國全境造成
EMP效果。
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
https://tinyurl.com/y7lvr7pp
5.備註:
前蘇聯就有5000萬噸TNT的沙皇氫彈了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.254.141.136
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1504658590.A.A12.html
→
09/06 08:44, , 1F
09/06 08:44, 1F
推
09/06 08:44, , 2F
09/06 08:44, 2F
→
09/06 08:44, , 3F
09/06 08:44, 3F
推
09/06 08:44, , 4F
09/06 08:44, 4F
推
09/06 08:44, , 5F
09/06 08:44, 5F
推
09/06 08:44, , 6F
09/06 08:44, 6F
→
09/06 08:44, , 7F
09/06 08:44, 7F
→
09/06 08:44, , 8F
09/06 08:44, 8F
推
09/06 08:44, , 9F
09/06 08:44, 9F
推
09/06 08:45, , 10F
09/06 08:45, 10F
推
09/06 08:45, , 11F
09/06 08:45, 11F
推
09/06 08:45, , 12F
09/06 08:45, 12F
推
09/06 08:45, , 13F
09/06 08:45, 13F
推
09/06 08:45, , 14F
09/06 08:45, 14F
推
09/06 08:45, , 15F
09/06 08:45, 15F
→
09/06 08:46, , 16F
09/06 08:46, 16F
→
09/06 08:46, , 17F
09/06 08:46, 17F
→
09/06 08:46, , 18F
09/06 08:46, 18F
推
09/06 08:46, , 19F
09/06 08:46, 19F
→
09/06 08:46, , 20F
09/06 08:46, 20F
→
09/06 08:47, , 21F
09/06 08:47, 21F
→
09/06 08:47, , 22F
09/06 08:47, 22F
→
09/06 08:47, , 23F
09/06 08:47, 23F
推
09/06 08:47, , 24F
09/06 08:47, 24F
推
09/06 08:47, , 25F
09/06 08:47, 25F
推
09/06 08:48, , 26F
09/06 08:48, 26F
推
09/06 08:49, , 27F
09/06 08:49, 27F
推
09/06 08:50, , 28F
09/06 08:50, 28F
推
09/06 08:50, , 29F
09/06 08:50, 29F
推
09/06 08:51, , 30F
09/06 08:51, 30F
噓
09/06 08:51, , 31F
09/06 08:51, 31F
推
09/06 08:51, , 32F
09/06 08:51, 32F
推
09/06 08:52, , 33F
09/06 08:52, 33F
→
09/06 08:52, , 34F
09/06 08:52, 34F
推
09/06 08:54, , 35F
09/06 08:54, 35F
→
09/06 08:54, , 36F
09/06 08:54, 36F
推
09/06 08:54, , 37F
09/06 08:54, 37F
→
09/06 08:56, , 38F
09/06 08:56, 38F
→
09/06 08:56, , 39F
09/06 08:56, 39F
還有 48 則推文
推
09/06 10:07, , 88F
09/06 10:07, 88F
→
09/06 10:08, , 89F
09/06 10:08, 89F
推
09/06 10:11, , 90F
09/06 10:11, 90F
推
09/06 10:12, , 91F
09/06 10:12, 91F
推
09/06 10:13, , 92F
09/06 10:13, 92F
→
09/06 10:19, , 93F
09/06 10:19, 93F
推
09/06 10:23, , 94F
09/06 10:23, 94F
推
09/06 10:27, , 95F
09/06 10:27, 95F
推
09/06 10:29, , 96F
09/06 10:29, 96F
推
09/06 10:37, , 97F
09/06 10:37, 97F
推
09/06 10:41, , 98F
09/06 10:41, 98F
推
09/06 10:46, , 99F
09/06 10:46, 99F
→
09/06 10:47, , 100F
09/06 10:47, 100F
推
09/06 10:48, , 101F
09/06 10:48, 101F
推
09/06 10:58, , 102F
09/06 10:58, 102F
推
09/06 11:11, , 103F
09/06 11:11, 103F
推
09/06 11:14, , 104F
09/06 11:14, 104F
→
09/06 11:16, , 105F
09/06 11:16, 105F
推
09/06 11:17, , 106F
09/06 11:17, 106F
推
09/06 11:31, , 107F
09/06 11:31, 107F
→
09/06 11:41, , 108F
09/06 11:41, 108F
推
09/06 12:00, , 109F
09/06 12:00, 109F
推
09/06 12:04, , 110F
09/06 12:04, 110F
推
09/06 12:21, , 111F
09/06 12:21, 111F
推
09/06 12:27, , 112F
09/06 12:27, 112F
推
09/06 12:33, , 113F
09/06 12:33, 113F
推
09/06 12:38, , 114F
09/06 12:38, 114F
→
09/06 13:10, , 115F
09/06 13:10, 115F
推
09/06 13:14, , 116F
09/06 13:14, 116F
→
09/06 13:14, , 117F
09/06 13:14, 117F
推
09/06 13:17, , 118F
09/06 13:17, 118F
→
09/06 13:17, , 119F
09/06 13:17, 119F
推
09/06 13:23, , 120F
09/06 13:23, 120F
→
09/06 14:04, , 121F
09/06 14:04, 121F
→
09/06 14:05, , 122F
09/06 14:05, 122F
推
09/06 15:26, , 123F
09/06 15:26, 123F
推
09/06 15:43, , 124F
09/06 15:43, 124F
→
09/06 16:18, , 125F
09/06 16:18, 125F
推
09/06 16:23, , 126F
09/06 16:23, 126F
→
09/06 17:35, , 127F
09/06 17:35, 127F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):