[問卦] 生小孩會帶財的說法從哪來的?消失
各位帥帥,水水,宅宅,大家好
應該常常聽說長輩勸人生小孩的理由是小孩會帶財吧?
肥宅我很好奇,這個說法的來源到底可以追溯到多久以前呢?
有任何文言文古代書籍,比如說本草綱目之類的有記載生小孩會帶財嗎?
肥宅估狗過生子帶財都查不到甚麼引經據典的來源,
只有近幾年來一堆沒小孩的夫妻在靠北長輩胡言亂語,
還請民俗學家蒞臨指導,謝謝。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.138.153.213
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1504447718.A.FDD.html
推
09/03 22:08, , 1F
09/03 22:08, 1F
→
09/03 22:09, , 2F
09/03 22:09, 2F
→
09/03 22:09, , 3F
09/03 22:09, 3F
→
09/03 22:09, , 4F
09/03 22:09, 4F
→
09/03 22:09, , 5F
09/03 22:09, 5F
→
09/03 22:09, , 6F
09/03 22:09, 6F
推
09/03 22:09, , 7F
09/03 22:09, 7F
推
09/03 22:09, , 8F
09/03 22:09, 8F
推
09/03 22:09, , 9F
09/03 22:09, 9F
推
09/03 22:09, , 10F
09/03 22:09, 10F
→
09/03 22:10, , 11F
09/03 22:10, 11F
推
09/03 22:10, , 12F
09/03 22:10, 12F
推
09/03 22:10, , 13F
09/03 22:10, 13F
→
09/03 22:10, , 14F
09/03 22:10, 14F
→
09/03 22:10, , 15F
09/03 22:10, 15F
→
09/03 22:10, , 16F
09/03 22:10, 16F
→
09/03 22:10, , 17F
09/03 22:10, 17F
→
09/03 22:10, , 18F
09/03 22:10, 18F
→
09/03 22:10, , 19F
09/03 22:10, 19F
推
09/03 22:11, , 20F
09/03 22:11, 20F
→
09/03 22:11, , 21F
09/03 22:11, 21F
→
09/03 22:11, , 22F
09/03 22:11, 22F
→
09/03 22:12, , 23F
09/03 22:12, 23F
推
09/03 22:12, , 24F
09/03 22:12, 24F
→
09/03 22:12, , 25F
09/03 22:12, 25F
→
09/03 22:13, , 26F
09/03 22:13, 26F
推
09/03 22:13, , 27F
09/03 22:13, 27F
→
09/03 22:13, , 28F
09/03 22:13, 28F
→
09/03 22:13, , 29F
09/03 22:13, 29F
推
09/03 22:13, , 30F
09/03 22:13, 30F
推
09/03 22:14, , 31F
09/03 22:14, 31F
推
09/03 22:15, , 32F
09/03 22:15, 32F
→
09/03 22:16, , 33F
09/03 22:16, 33F
→
09/03 22:16, , 34F
09/03 22:16, 34F
推
09/03 22:17, , 35F
09/03 22:17, 35F
→
09/03 22:17, , 36F
09/03 22:17, 36F
→
09/03 22:17, , 37F
09/03 22:17, 37F
所以從古到今五千年來沒有任何稗官野史甚至戲曲小說記載生子帶財這個說法嘛?
我查了半天歷史最接近的只有易子而食,就是個備用糧食的概念;現代沒用了吧= =?
※ 編輯: ray0808 (223.138.153.213), 09/03/2017 22:21:52
推
09/03 22:19, , 38F
09/03 22:19, 38F
推
09/03 22:20, , 39F
09/03 22:20, 39F
推
09/03 22:21, , 40F
09/03 22:21, 40F
→
09/03 22:25, , 41F
09/03 22:25, 41F
→
09/03 22:25, , 42F
09/03 22:25, 42F
→
09/03 22:25, , 43F
09/03 22:25, 43F
推
09/03 22:26, , 44F
09/03 22:26, 44F
噓
09/03 22:29, , 45F
09/03 22:29, 45F
→
09/03 22:29, , 46F
09/03 22:29, 46F
推
09/03 22:31, , 47F
09/03 22:31, 47F
→
09/03 22:32, , 48F
09/03 22:32, 48F
推
09/03 22:33, , 49F
09/03 22:33, 49F
推
09/03 23:09, , 50F
09/03 23:09, 50F
推
09/03 23:12, , 51F
09/03 23:12, 51F
推
09/03 23:17, , 52F
09/03 23:17, 52F
→
09/03 23:18, , 53F
09/03 23:18, 53F
→
09/03 23:23, , 54F
09/03 23:23, 54F
推
09/04 00:55, , 55F
09/04 00:55, 55F
推
09/04 05:51, , 56F
09/04 05:51, 56F
→
09/04 08:02, , 57F
09/04 08:02, 57F
推
09/04 11:36, , 58F
09/04 11:36, 58F
→
09/04 11:58, , 59F
09/04 11:58, 59F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):