[問卦] 桃園憑什麼成為六都?消失
台灣六都最沒資格進來的就是非桃園莫屬了
經濟不發達、人口數不高、科技業金融業全無
就只有一個會漏水的國際機場當地標
反觀
臺北:經濟and政府重鎮
新北:臺北衛星城,有眾多小企業進駐
台中:有中科+火力發電 ,人民薪資穩健成長
臺南:歷史古蹟+南科+南霸天學府
高雄:幸福城市 重工業+南科
請問這要怎麼比?
桃園經濟不行、觀光也不行,連企業也沒人要進駐 科技業也發展不起來
自以為蓋了條捷運就是經濟奇蹟了是不是?蛤?
真的不懂桃園那什麼鳥市為什麼能進六都啊?
把位置讓給真正有在替台灣賺錢的回收業城市還比較好一點
干五八卦?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 125.231.51.195
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1504332898.A.C6B.html
※ 編輯: tte09567 (125.231.51.195), 09/02/2017 14:15:49
→
09/02 14:15, , 1F
09/02 14:15, 1F
→
09/02 14:15, , 2F
09/02 14:15, 2F
推
09/02 14:15, , 3F
09/02 14:15, 3F
噓
09/02 14:16, , 4F
09/02 14:16, 4F
→
09/02 14:16, , 5F
09/02 14:16, 5F
→
09/02 14:16, , 6F
09/02 14:16, 6F
推
09/02 14:16, , 7F
09/02 14:16, 7F
噓
09/02 14:16, , 8F
09/02 14:16, 8F
噓
09/02 14:16, , 9F
09/02 14:16, 9F
推
09/02 14:16, , 10F
09/02 14:16, 10F
→
09/02 14:16, , 11F
09/02 14:16, 11F
噓
09/02 14:17, , 12F
09/02 14:17, 12F
→
09/02 14:17, , 13F
09/02 14:17, 13F
※ 編輯: tte09567 (125.231.51.195), 09/02/2017 14:17:38
→
09/02 14:17, , 14F
09/02 14:17, 14F
→
09/02 14:17, , 15F
09/02 14:17, 15F
推
09/02 14:18, , 16F
09/02 14:18, 16F
台中有中科
噓
09/02 14:18, , 17F
09/02 14:18, 17F
→
09/02 14:18, , 18F
09/02 14:18, 18F
噓
09/02 14:18, , 19F
09/02 14:18, 19F
噓
09/02 14:19, , 20F
09/02 14:19, 20F
→
09/02 14:20, , 21F
09/02 14:20, 21F
※ 編輯: tte09567 (125.231.51.195), 09/02/2017 14:22:41
→
09/02 14:26, , 22F
09/02 14:26, 22F
→
09/02 14:26, , 23F
09/02 14:26, 23F
噓
09/02 14:27, , 24F
09/02 14:27, 24F
推
09/02 14:28, , 25F
09/02 14:28, 25F
噓
09/02 14:29, , 26F
09/02 14:29, 26F
推
09/02 14:29, , 27F
09/02 14:29, 27F
推
09/02 14:30, , 28F
09/02 14:30, 28F
噓
09/02 14:34, , 29F
09/02 14:34, 29F
→
09/02 14:37, , 30F
09/02 14:37, 30F
→
09/02 14:37, , 31F
09/02 14:37, 31F
噓
09/02 14:37, , 32F
09/02 14:37, 32F
噓
09/02 14:38, , 33F
09/02 14:38, 33F
→
09/02 14:39, , 34F
09/02 14:39, 34F
噓
09/02 14:40, , 35F
09/02 14:40, 35F
噓
09/02 14:40, , 36F
09/02 14:40, 36F
→
09/02 14:40, , 37F
09/02 14:40, 37F
推
09/02 14:40, , 38F
09/02 14:40, 38F
→
09/02 14:40, , 39F
09/02 14:40, 39F
→
09/02 14:41, , 40F
09/02 14:41, 40F
→
09/02 14:42, , 41F
09/02 14:42, 41F
→
09/02 14:42, , 42F
09/02 14:42, 42F
推
09/02 14:47, , 43F
09/02 14:47, 43F
噓
09/02 14:48, , 44F
09/02 14:48, 44F
噓
09/02 14:53, , 45F
09/02 14:53, 45F
推
09/02 14:54, , 46F
09/02 14:54, 46F
推
09/02 14:55, , 47F
09/02 14:55, 47F
噓
09/02 14:58, , 48F
09/02 14:58, 48F
推
09/02 14:58, , 49F
09/02 14:58, 49F
噓
09/02 14:59, , 50F
09/02 14:59, 50F
噓
09/02 15:06, , 51F
09/02 15:06, 51F
噓
09/02 15:07, , 52F
09/02 15:07, 52F
推
09/02 15:07, , 53F
09/02 15:07, 53F
→
09/02 15:08, , 54F
09/02 15:08, 54F
→
09/02 15:08, , 55F
09/02 15:08, 55F
→
09/02 15:10, , 56F
09/02 15:10, 56F
→
09/02 15:10, , 57F
09/02 15:10, 57F
噓
09/02 15:12, , 58F
09/02 15:12, 58F
推
09/02 15:37, , 59F
09/02 15:37, 59F
→
09/02 15:38, , 60F
09/02 15:38, 60F
噓
09/02 15:47, , 61F
09/02 15:47, 61F
→
09/02 16:04, , 62F
09/02 16:04, 62F
推
09/02 16:07, , 63F
09/02 16:07, 63F
→
09/02 16:07, , 64F
09/02 16:07, 64F
噓
09/02 16:11, , 65F
09/02 16:11, 65F
→
09/02 16:11, , 66F
09/02 16:11, 66F
噓
09/02 16:22, , 67F
09/02 16:22, 67F
噓
09/02 16:33, , 68F
09/02 16:33, 68F
推
09/02 16:36, , 69F
09/02 16:36, 69F
→
09/02 16:44, , 70F
09/02 16:44, 70F
推
09/02 17:11, , 71F
09/02 17:11, 71F
→
09/02 17:11, , 72F
09/02 17:11, 72F
→
09/02 17:29, , 73F
09/02 17:29, 73F
推
09/02 17:45, , 74F
09/02 17:45, 74F
推
09/02 21:09, , 75F
09/02 21:09, 75F
→
09/02 21:09, , 76F
09/02 21:09, 76F
推
09/02 21:10, , 77F
09/02 21:10, 77F
→
09/02 21:10, , 78F
09/02 21:10, 78F
推
09/02 21:13, , 79F
09/02 21:13, 79F
→
09/02 21:13, , 80F
09/02 21:13, 80F
→
09/02 21:13, , 81F
09/02 21:13, 81F
→
09/02 21:14, , 82F
09/02 21:14, 82F
噓
09/02 21:15, , 83F
09/02 21:15, 83F
噓
09/02 22:29, , 84F
09/02 22:29, 84F
討論串 (同標題文章)