[問卦] 為了廢核,台灣人願意電價漲多少?消失
之前看雜誌,德國為了廢核,願意忍受高電價,而且基本上沒有甚麼人抱怨,還一堆人
用節能家電,好像是82%的人支持廢核的樣子。
但即便如此,德國到現在好像也還沒完全廢核。
反觀台灣,之前馬英九油電雙漲,結果民調一路跌,跌到都變9.2總統了,而且他還是
台灣史上得票最高的民選總統,其他之後的總統大概更不敢動電價。
台灣人反核感覺都是用嘴巴喊喊,真的要漲電價就好像要殺你全家一樣,隨便一個鬍鬚
張漲價大概都要他們的命。
台灣如果真要反核,願意漲多少電價?
我猜是0啦,有沒有這方面的八卦?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.227.217.232
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1502810119.A.F04.html
推
08/15 23:15, , 1F
08/15 23:15, 1F
推
08/15 23:16, , 2F
08/15 23:16, 2F
推
08/15 23:16, , 3F
08/15 23:16, 3F
推
08/15 23:16, , 4F
08/15 23:16, 4F
→
08/15 23:16, , 5F
08/15 23:16, 5F
推
08/15 23:16, , 6F
08/15 23:16, 6F
推
08/15 23:17, , 7F
08/15 23:17, 7F
等到真廢核的時候還會再漲的,放心好了。
→
08/15 23:17, , 8F
08/15 23:17, 8F
推
08/15 23:17, , 9F
08/15 23:17, 9F
→
08/15 23:17, , 10F
08/15 23:17, 10F
→
08/15 23:17, , 11F
08/15 23:17, 11F
推
08/15 23:17, , 12F
08/15 23:17, 12F
※ 編輯: DarkHolbach (36.227.217.232), 08/15/2017 23:18:24
→
08/15 23:18, , 13F
08/15 23:18, 13F
說實在,這也是我覺得滿可笑的地方,他們說要廢核結果還是用核電。
這就好像我說不要用自來水,然後去隔壁鄰居家借自來水。
→
08/15 23:18, , 14F
08/15 23:18, 14F
推
08/15 23:18, , 15F
08/15 23:18, 15F
→
08/15 23:18, , 16F
08/15 23:18, 16F
推
08/15 23:18, , 17F
08/15 23:18, 17F
→
08/15 23:18, , 18F
08/15 23:18, 18F
→
08/15 23:18, , 19F
08/15 23:18, 19F
→
08/15 23:18, , 20F
08/15 23:18, 20F
→
08/15 23:18, , 21F
08/15 23:18, 21F
※ 編輯: DarkHolbach (36.227.217.232), 08/15/2017 23:21:14
推
08/15 23:20, , 22F
08/15 23:20, 22F
→
08/15 23:20, , 23F
08/15 23:20, 23F
噓
08/15 23:20, , 24F
08/15 23:20, 24F
→
08/15 23:21, , 25F
08/15 23:21, 25F

→
08/15 23:21, , 26F
08/15 23:21, 26F
→
08/15 23:22, , 27F
08/15 23:22, 27F
推
08/15 23:22, , 28F
08/15 23:22, 28F
→
08/15 23:23, , 29F
08/15 23:23, 29F
噓
08/15 23:23, , 30F
08/15 23:23, 30F
推
08/15 23:23, , 31F
08/15 23:23, 31F
→
08/15 23:24, , 32F
08/15 23:24, 32F
推
08/15 23:25, , 33F
08/15 23:25, 33F
→
08/15 23:25, , 34F
08/15 23:25, 34F
噓
08/15 23:26, , 35F
08/15 23:26, 35F
→
08/15 23:27, , 36F
08/15 23:27, 36F
→
08/15 23:27, , 37F
08/15 23:27, 37F
噓
08/15 23:27, , 38F
08/15 23:27, 38F
→
08/15 23:27, , 39F
08/15 23:27, 39F
推
08/15 23:27, , 40F
08/15 23:27, 40F
→
08/15 23:28, , 41F
08/15 23:28, 41F
→
08/15 23:28, , 42F
08/15 23:28, 42F
噓
08/15 23:29, , 43F
08/15 23:29, 43F
噓
08/15 23:30, , 44F
08/15 23:30, 44F
推
08/15 23:31, , 45F
08/15 23:31, 45F
→
08/15 23:32, , 46F
08/15 23:32, 46F
→
08/15 23:33, , 47F
08/15 23:33, 47F
推
08/15 23:34, , 48F
08/15 23:34, 48F
推
08/15 23:38, , 49F
08/15 23:38, 49F
→
08/15 23:44, , 50F
08/15 23:44, 50F
→
08/15 23:45, , 51F
08/15 23:45, 51F
→
08/15 23:48, , 52F
08/15 23:48, 52F
→
08/15 23:48, , 53F
08/15 23:48, 53F
推
08/15 23:49, , 54F
08/15 23:49, 54F
推
08/15 23:51, , 55F
08/15 23:51, 55F
推
08/15 23:52, , 56F
08/15 23:52, 56F
噓
08/15 23:58, , 57F
08/15 23:58, 57F
→
08/15 23:58, , 58F
08/15 23:58, 58F
→
08/15 23:59, , 59F
08/15 23:59, 59F
噓
08/16 00:03, , 60F
08/16 00:03, 60F
→
08/16 00:42, , 61F
08/16 00:42, 61F
→
08/16 01:40, , 62F
08/16 01:40, 62F
噓
08/16 01:42, , 63F
08/16 01:42, 63F
→
08/16 01:42, , 64F
08/16 01:42, 64F
推
08/16 04:19, , 65F
08/16 04:19, 65F
→
08/16 04:19, , 66F
08/16 04:19, 66F
推
08/16 08:56, , 67F
08/16 08:56, 67F
推
08/16 09:15, , 68F
08/16 09:15, 68F
噓
08/16 10:57, , 69F
08/16 10:57, 69F
推
08/16 20:05, , 70F
08/16 20:05, 70F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):