[新聞] 漲基本工資?產業大老:軍公教先調薪再說消失
聯合新聞網
漲基本工資?產業大老:軍公教先調薪再說
基本工資審議委員會本月18日登場,經濟部長李世光及勞動部長林美珠今天上午先與七大
工商團體及資方代表會面溝通,工商協進會理事長林伯豐今天表示,如果政府執意要漲基
本工資,應該從軍公教調薪先做起,企業再跟進,做到全國調薪。
林伯豐今天上午在進入會場前表示,產業界有兩個立場,第一、目前有必要重新立法的勞
基法修正,應該先過了、再來談其他的,第二、現在領基本工資的本國勞工只有24萬人,
產業界認為如果要調薪,不只勞工需要,全國都需要,建議軍公教先調薪,企業再follow
,再跟上。
林伯豐解釋,造成物價上漲因素很多,一例一休也是物價上漲因素之一,現在已造成物價
上漲了,再來談調薪,那就要全員調薪,全國調薪,才是正確方向。
林伯豐表示,調薪和一例一休都會造成企業成本增加,適者生存,能夠生存的繼續生存,
努力在台灣奮鬥,生存不了的就是減產或是外移,跟隨國家政策到東南亞,到美國,到非
洲去投資。
對於是否要拿一例一休當作和政府談判基本工資調漲的籌碼?林伯豐表示,「一例一休如
果能夠重新立法修正,全員調漲工資,我們會做的」。
https://udn.com/news/story/7238/2641015
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.132.62.62
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1502683949.A.81F.html
→
08/14 12:12, , 1F
08/14 12:12, 1F
噓
08/14 12:13, , 2F
08/14 12:13, 2F
噓
08/14 12:13, , 3F
08/14 12:13, 3F
→
08/14 12:13, , 4F
08/14 12:13, 4F
噓
08/14 12:13, , 5F
08/14 12:13, 5F
→
08/14 12:13, , 6F
08/14 12:13, 6F
推
08/14 12:13, , 7F
08/14 12:13, 7F
噓
08/14 12:13, , 8F
08/14 12:13, 8F
推
08/14 12:13, , 9F
08/14 12:13, 9F
噓
08/14 12:13, , 10F
08/14 12:13, 10F
→
08/14 12:13, , 11F
08/14 12:13, 11F
噓
08/14 12:14, , 12F
08/14 12:14, 12F
→
08/14 12:14, , 13F
08/14 12:14, 13F
→
08/14 12:14, , 14F
08/14 12:14, 14F
→
08/14 12:14, , 15F
08/14 12:14, 15F
→
08/14 12:14, , 16F
08/14 12:14, 16F
→
08/14 12:14, , 17F
08/14 12:14, 17F
→
08/14 12:15, , 18F
08/14 12:15, 18F
→
08/14 12:15, , 19F
08/14 12:15, 19F
噓
08/14 12:15, , 20F
08/14 12:15, 20F
→
08/14 12:15, , 21F
08/14 12:15, 21F
→
08/14 12:15, , 22F
08/14 12:15, 22F
推
08/14 12:16, , 23F
08/14 12:16, 23F
噓
08/14 12:16, , 24F
08/14 12:16, 24F
→
08/14 12:16, , 25F
08/14 12:16, 25F
→
08/14 12:16, , 26F
08/14 12:16, 26F
→
08/14 12:17, , 27F
08/14 12:17, 27F
推
08/14 12:17, , 28F
08/14 12:17, 28F
推
08/14 12:17, , 29F
08/14 12:17, 29F
→
08/14 12:17, , 30F
08/14 12:17, 30F
→
08/14 12:17, , 31F
08/14 12:17, 31F
推
08/14 12:18, , 32F
08/14 12:18, 32F
推
08/14 12:20, , 33F
08/14 12:20, 33F
推
08/14 12:20, , 34F
08/14 12:20, 34F
推
08/14 12:21, , 35F
08/14 12:21, 35F
→
08/14 12:22, , 36F
08/14 12:22, 36F
噓
08/14 12:22, , 37F
08/14 12:22, 37F
噓
08/14 12:22, , 38F
08/14 12:22, 38F
噓
08/14 12:22, , 39F
08/14 12:22, 39F
還有 27 則推文
→
08/14 12:32, , 67F
08/14 12:32, 67F
→
08/14 12:32, , 68F
08/14 12:32, 68F
噓
08/14 12:32, , 69F
08/14 12:32, 69F
推
08/14 12:33, , 70F
08/14 12:33, 70F
→
08/14 12:33, , 71F
08/14 12:33, 71F
噓
08/14 12:33, , 72F
08/14 12:33, 72F
→
08/14 12:33, , 73F
08/14 12:33, 73F
噓
08/14 12:37, , 74F
08/14 12:37, 74F
→
08/14 12:37, , 75F
08/14 12:37, 75F
噓
08/14 12:37, , 76F
08/14 12:37, 76F
→
08/14 12:37, , 77F
08/14 12:37, 77F
→
08/14 12:38, , 78F
08/14 12:38, 78F
推
08/14 12:41, , 79F
08/14 12:41, 79F
噓
08/14 12:41, , 80F
08/14 12:41, 80F
推
08/14 12:41, , 81F
08/14 12:41, 81F
→
08/14 12:44, , 82F
08/14 12:44, 82F
→
08/14 12:45, , 83F
08/14 12:45, 83F
噓
08/14 12:49, , 84F
08/14 12:49, 84F
→
08/14 12:49, , 85F
08/14 12:49, 85F
噓
08/14 12:51, , 86F
08/14 12:51, 86F
噓
08/14 13:02, , 87F
08/14 13:02, 87F
→
08/14 13:10, , 88F
08/14 13:10, 88F
噓
08/14 13:13, , 89F
08/14 13:13, 89F
噓
08/14 13:24, , 90F
08/14 13:24, 90F
噓
08/14 13:27, , 91F
08/14 13:27, 91F
推
08/14 13:33, , 92F
08/14 13:33, 92F
噓
08/14 13:53, , 93F
08/14 13:53, 93F
噓
08/14 13:55, , 94F
08/14 13:55, 94F
噓
08/14 14:30, , 95F
08/14 14:30, 95F
噓
08/14 16:10, , 96F
08/14 16:10, 96F
噓
08/14 16:10, , 97F
08/14 16:10, 97F
噓
08/14 16:12, , 98F
08/14 16:12, 98F
推
08/14 16:48, , 99F
08/14 16:48, 99F
噓
08/14 17:01, , 100F
08/14 17:01, 100F
噓
08/14 18:19, , 101F
08/14 18:19, 101F
噓
08/14 19:19, , 102F
08/14 19:19, 102F
噓
08/14 19:45, , 103F
08/14 19:45, 103F
噓
08/14 19:48, , 104F
08/14 19:48, 104F
→
08/15 01:56, , 105F
08/15 01:56, 105F
噓
08/15 15:12, , 106F
08/15 15:12, 106F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):