[問卦] 大家對核輻射是不是太過恐慌了?消失
我先前看到一篇文是寫
其實不必過於害怕核輻射
文中寫說長崎廣島被投放原子彈
當時專家預測方圓幾百公里的海洋資源50年內都不能被使用對人類有害
也預測周遭陸上動植物20年內都暴露在極大的基因變異危險
後來出乎意外的是海洋汙染在核災5年後輻射物質衰減到一半以下
不到10年海洋幾乎恢復了原先的生態 生機盎然
輻射汙染沒有想像中如此嚴重
所以說 核電核廢料是不是也只是不停被媒體炒作下才讓民眾過度恐慌的呢
其實核災也沒有想像中這麼危險可怕?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 125.231.169.102
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1502679998.A.9CC.html
→
08/14 11:06, , 1F
08/14 11:06, 1F
→
08/14 11:07, , 2F
08/14 11:07, 2F
→
08/14 11:07, , 3F
08/14 11:07, 3F
→
08/14 11:07, , 4F
08/14 11:07, 4F
噓
08/14 11:07, , 5F
08/14 11:07, 5F
推
08/14 11:07, , 6F
08/14 11:07, 6F
→
08/14 11:07, , 7F
08/14 11:07, 7F
噓
08/14 11:08, , 8F
08/14 11:08, 8F
推
08/14 11:08, , 9F
08/14 11:08, 9F
→
08/14 11:08, , 10F
08/14 11:08, 10F
→
08/14 11:08, , 11F
08/14 11:08, 11F
→
08/14 11:08, , 12F
08/14 11:08, 12F
噓
08/14 11:09, , 13F
08/14 11:09, 13F
推
08/14 11:09, , 14F
08/14 11:09, 14F
推
08/14 11:09, , 15F
08/14 11:09, 15F
推
08/14 11:10, , 16F
08/14 11:10, 16F
推
08/14 11:10, , 17F
08/14 11:10, 17F
推
08/14 11:10, , 18F
08/14 11:10, 18F
→
08/14 11:11, , 19F
08/14 11:11, 19F
噓
08/14 11:11, , 20F
08/14 11:11, 20F
噓
08/14 11:16, , 21F
08/14 11:16, 21F
推
08/14 11:17, , 22F
08/14 11:17, 22F
→
08/14 11:33, , 23F
08/14 11:33, 23F
→
08/14 11:33, , 24F
08/14 11:33, 24F
推
08/14 11:33, , 25F
08/14 11:33, 25F
→
08/14 11:34, , 26F
08/14 11:34, 26F
推
08/14 11:42, , 27F
08/14 11:42, 27F
→
08/14 11:42, , 28F
08/14 11:42, 28F
→
08/14 11:42, , 29F
08/14 11:42, 29F
→
08/14 11:42, , 30F
08/14 11:42, 30F
噓
08/14 11:56, , 31F
08/14 11:56, 31F
→
08/14 12:01, , 32F
08/14 12:01, 32F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):