[新聞] 民調/吳敦義選高雄被5人慘電 不支持度破7成消失
1.媒體來源:東森
2.完整新聞標題:民調/吳敦義選高雄被5人慘電 不支持度破7成
3.完整新聞內文:
記者陶本和/台北報導
國民黨準主席吳敦義日前傳出南下征討2018高雄市市長。對此,《ETNEWS新聞雲》於
2017年8月1日至6日進行網路民調,完成959份有效樣本,結果顯示,慘遭民進黨檯面上5
位角逐者,立委趙天麟、陳其邁、劉世芳、管碧玲跟林岱樺打趴,不支持度超過7成。
吳敦義8月底上任國民黨黨主席,首先面對的第一大課題,就是2018年的百里侯選戰,而
日前更傳出他有意御駕親征長年被民進黨把持的高雄市市長大位;對此,《ETNEWS新聞
雲》特別進行網路民調,共計完成959份有效問卷。
▼《ETNEWS新聞雲》針對吳敦義參選高雄進行民調。(圖/記者陶本和攝)
http://i.imgur.com/iqpwJNg.jpg
不過,從民調資料結果顯示,在高雄市民方面,不支持吳敦義的高達71.6%,支持度只有
20%,沒有意見的84%;而在全體網友方面,不支持吳敦義的也高達56.4%、支持的25.9%
,沒有意見的有17.7%。
至於分別對壘方面,勝過吳敦義差距最大的是管碧玲的33.5%支持度,陳其邁32.9%、趙
天麟30.3%緊追在後,而林岱樺跟劉世芳則僅有29%跟24.5%的支持度。
http://i.imgur.com/4LT9ZFi.jpg
▲▼趙天麟(上)、陳其邁(下)爭奪高雄市長大位。(圖/記者周宸亘、陶本和攝)
http://i.imgur.com/SKJkcb6.jpg
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):https://goo.gl/h1QEu5
5.備註:白海豚UCCU~~~XDD
不過這篇報導也奇怪,明明管碧玲是第一名,
為何照片解釋卻說趙天麟與陳其邁爭奪市長大位阿?難道是葉佩雯?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.136.113.26
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1502297469.A.F9B.html
推
08/10 00:51, , 1F
08/10 00:51, 1F
→
08/10 00:51, , 2F
08/10 00:51, 2F
→
08/10 00:51, , 3F
08/10 00:51, 3F
→
08/10 00:51, , 4F
08/10 00:51, 4F
噓
08/10 00:51, , 5F
08/10 00:51, 5F
推
08/10 00:52, , 6F
08/10 00:52, 6F
推
08/10 00:53, , 7F
08/10 00:53, 7F
→
08/10 00:53, , 8F
08/10 00:53, 8F
→
08/10 00:53, , 9F
08/10 00:53, 9F
→
08/10 00:53, , 10F
08/10 00:53, 10F
推
08/10 00:53, , 11F
08/10 00:53, 11F
→
08/10 00:54, , 12F
08/10 00:54, 12F
→
08/10 00:54, , 13F
08/10 00:54, 13F
→
08/10 00:54, , 14F
08/10 00:54, 14F
→
08/10 00:55, , 15F
08/10 00:55, 15F
推
08/10 00:55, , 16F
08/10 00:55, 16F
推
08/10 00:56, , 17F
08/10 00:56, 17F
→
08/10 00:56, , 18F
08/10 00:56, 18F
→
08/10 00:56, , 19F
08/10 00:56, 19F
推
08/10 00:56, , 20F
08/10 00:56, 20F
→
08/10 00:57, , 21F
08/10 00:57, 21F
推
08/10 00:57, , 22F
08/10 00:57, 22F
推
08/10 00:59, , 23F
08/10 00:59, 23F
→
08/10 00:59, , 24F
08/10 00:59, 24F
→
08/10 01:00, , 25F
08/10 01:00, 25F
→
08/10 01:00, , 26F
08/10 01:00, 26F
→
08/10 01:00, , 27F
08/10 01:00, 27F
→
08/10 01:01, , 28F
08/10 01:01, 28F
→
08/10 01:01, , 29F
08/10 01:01, 29F
→
08/10 01:03, , 30F
08/10 01:03, 30F
推
08/10 01:04, , 31F
08/10 01:04, 31F
推
08/10 01:05, , 32F
08/10 01:05, 32F
→
08/10 01:06, , 33F
08/10 01:06, 33F
推
08/10 01:07, , 34F
08/10 01:07, 34F
推
08/10 01:07, , 35F
08/10 01:07, 35F
推
08/10 01:08, , 36F
08/10 01:08, 36F
→
08/10 01:08, , 37F
08/10 01:08, 37F
推
08/10 01:12, , 38F
08/10 01:12, 38F
推
08/10 01:13, , 39F
08/10 01:13, 39F
→
08/10 01:13, , 40F
08/10 01:13, 40F
→
08/10 01:14, , 41F
08/10 01:14, 41F
→
08/10 01:14, , 42F
08/10 01:14, 42F
推
08/10 01:15, , 43F
08/10 01:15, 43F
→
08/10 01:15, , 44F
08/10 01:15, 44F
推
08/10 01:19, , 45F
08/10 01:19, 45F
→
08/10 01:19, , 46F
08/10 01:19, 46F
推
08/10 01:20, , 47F
08/10 01:20, 47F
推
08/10 01:25, , 48F
08/10 01:25, 48F
推
08/10 01:29, , 49F
08/10 01:29, 49F
推
08/10 01:30, , 50F
08/10 01:30, 50F
→
08/10 01:37, , 51F
08/10 01:37, 51F
→
08/10 01:44, , 52F
08/10 01:44, 52F
推
08/10 01:58, , 53F
08/10 01:58, 53F
→
08/10 02:13, , 54F
08/10 02:13, 54F
→
08/10 02:53, , 55F
08/10 02:53, 55F
推
08/10 02:56, , 56F
08/10 02:56, 56F
推
08/10 03:21, , 57F
08/10 03:21, 57F
→
08/10 06:55, , 58F
08/10 06:55, 58F
推
08/10 07:22, , 59F
08/10 07:22, 59F
噓
08/10 07:26, , 60F
08/10 07:26, 60F
→
08/10 07:48, , 61F
08/10 07:48, 61F
→
08/10 07:49, , 62F
08/10 07:49, 62F
噓
08/10 08:22, , 63F
08/10 08:22, 63F
推
08/10 09:07, , 64F
08/10 09:07, 64F
推
08/10 09:40, , 65F
08/10 09:40, 65F
推
08/10 09:56, , 66F
08/10 09:56, 66F
推
08/10 11:30, , 67F
08/10 11:30, 67F
推
08/10 12:14, , 68F
08/10 12:14, 68F
→
08/10 14:11, , 69F
08/10 14:11, 69F
推
08/11 03:40, , 70F
08/11 03:40, 70F
→
08/11 03:40, , 71F
08/11 03:40, 71F
→
09/01 14:38, , 72F
09/01 14:38, 72F