[問卦] 過去公務員到底是搶著當還是沒人當?消失
對於要給公務員18%優惠、子女教育補助金、退休六萬...等族繁不及備載的優惠
有一種說法從10年前我國小還國中的時候就聽過了
因為那時候台灣經濟奇蹟
薪水固定的公務員沒人當
所以要給18%,才有人要去當公務員
這個理由我小時候當真了,現在卻覺得怪怪的
如果公務員沒人當
為什麼1950年開始的高普考,外省人的公務員保障名額高達96%以上?
到了1992年的高普考定額,台灣本土人比例還只有3.84%
如果公務員這麼白癡 都沒有人要當
為什麼掌握各階層資援的外省人要搶著當?
兩個事情明顯相牴觸
有沒有到底哪一個才是假的的八卦?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 163.25.99.91
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1499773915.A.4FD.html
※ 編輯: potter1529 (163.25.99.91), 07/11/2017 19:52:39
→
07/11 19:53, , 1F
07/11 19:53, 1F
推
07/11 19:53, , 2F
07/11 19:53, 2F
→
07/11 19:53, , 3F
07/11 19:53, 3F
推
07/11 19:53, , 4F
07/11 19:53, 4F
噓
07/11 19:53, , 5F
07/11 19:53, 5F
推
07/11 19:54, , 6F
07/11 19:54, 6F
→
07/11 19:54, , 7F
07/11 19:54, 7F
推
07/11 19:54, , 8F
07/11 19:54, 8F
推
07/11 19:54, , 9F
07/11 19:54, 9F
推
07/11 19:54, , 10F
07/11 19:54, 10F
→
07/11 19:54, , 11F
07/11 19:54, 11F
→
07/11 19:55, , 12F
07/11 19:55, 12F
推
07/11 19:55, , 13F
07/11 19:55, 13F
推
07/11 19:56, , 14F
07/11 19:56, 14F
![](https://i.imgur.com/LqVIubI.jpg)
→
07/11 19:56, , 15F
07/11 19:56, 15F
→
07/11 19:56, , 16F
07/11 19:56, 16F
推
07/11 19:56, , 17F
07/11 19:56, 17F
→
07/11 19:57, , 18F
07/11 19:57, 18F
→
07/11 19:58, , 19F
07/11 19:58, 19F
→
07/11 19:59, , 20F
07/11 19:59, 20F
推
07/11 19:59, , 21F
07/11 19:59, 21F
推
07/11 19:59, , 22F
07/11 19:59, 22F
噓
07/11 19:59, , 23F
07/11 19:59, 23F
→
07/11 19:59, , 24F
07/11 19:59, 24F
→
07/11 20:00, , 25F
07/11 20:00, 25F
→
07/11 20:00, , 26F
07/11 20:00, 26F
→
07/11 20:00, , 27F
07/11 20:00, 27F
→
07/11 20:00, , 28F
07/11 20:00, 28F
推
07/11 20:00, , 29F
07/11 20:00, 29F
→
07/11 20:00, , 30F
07/11 20:00, 30F
→
07/11 20:00, , 31F
07/11 20:00, 31F
→
07/11 20:01, , 32F
07/11 20:01, 32F
→
07/11 20:01, , 33F
07/11 20:01, 33F
→
07/11 20:01, , 34F
07/11 20:01, 34F
→
07/11 20:01, , 35F
07/11 20:01, 35F
→
07/11 20:02, , 36F
07/11 20:02, 36F
→
07/11 20:02, , 37F
07/11 20:02, 37F
→
07/11 20:03, , 38F
07/11 20:03, 38F
→
07/11 20:03, , 39F
07/11 20:03, 39F
還有 116 則推文
→
07/11 21:03, , 156F
07/11 21:03, 156F
→
07/11 21:04, , 157F
07/11 21:04, 157F
→
07/11 21:06, , 158F
07/11 21:06, 158F
→
07/11 21:06, , 159F
07/11 21:06, 159F
→
07/11 21:06, , 160F
07/11 21:06, 160F
推
07/11 21:13, , 161F
07/11 21:13, 161F
→
07/11 21:13, , 162F
07/11 21:13, 162F
→
07/11 21:14, , 163F
07/11 21:14, 163F
→
07/11 21:14, , 164F
07/11 21:14, 164F
→
07/11 21:15, , 165F
07/11 21:15, 165F
→
07/11 21:15, , 166F
07/11 21:15, 166F
→
07/11 21:15, , 167F
07/11 21:15, 167F
推
07/11 21:27, , 168F
07/11 21:27, 168F
→
07/11 21:27, , 169F
07/11 21:27, 169F
→
07/11 21:31, , 170F
07/11 21:31, 170F
推
07/11 21:35, , 171F
07/11 21:35, 171F
→
07/11 21:35, , 172F
07/11 21:35, 172F
→
07/11 21:36, , 173F
07/11 21:36, 173F
推
07/11 21:54, , 174F
07/11 21:54, 174F
推
07/11 21:55, , 175F
07/11 21:55, 175F
→
07/11 21:55, , 176F
07/11 21:55, 176F
推
07/11 22:00, , 177F
07/11 22:00, 177F
→
07/11 22:01, , 178F
07/11 22:01, 178F
噓
07/11 22:08, , 179F
07/11 22:08, 179F
→
07/11 22:08, , 180F
07/11 22:08, 180F
推
07/11 22:13, , 181F
07/11 22:13, 181F
→
07/11 22:13, , 182F
07/11 22:13, 182F
推
07/11 22:17, , 183F
07/11 22:17, 183F
→
07/11 22:17, , 184F
07/11 22:17, 184F
推
07/11 22:37, , 185F
07/11 22:37, 185F
→
07/11 22:38, , 186F
07/11 22:38, 186F
→
07/11 22:38, , 187F
07/11 22:38, 187F
噓
07/12 03:26, , 188F
07/12 03:26, 188F
→
07/12 06:38, , 189F
07/12 06:38, 189F
推
07/12 07:24, , 190F
07/12 07:24, 190F
推
07/12 11:33, , 191F
07/12 11:33, 191F
推
07/12 23:07, , 192F
07/12 23:07, 192F
→
07/12 23:07, , 193F
07/12 23:07, 193F
→
07/12 23:07, , 194F
07/12 23:07, 194F
→
07/12 23:07, , 195F
07/12 23:07, 195F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):