[新聞] 黃暐瀚:把斷交怪馬和陸 最不花大腦的做法消失
中時 黃暐瀚:把斷交怪馬和陸 最不花大腦的做法
http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20170619000966-260407
巴拿馬上星期宣布和中國大陸建交,對中華民國無疑是個很大打擊,有部分挺綠民眾認為
,這都是前總統馬英九當政期間的「親中」路線所致,不能怪現任總統蔡英文;對此,資
深媒體人黃暐瀚認為,怪馬、怪友邦、怪大陸都不難,但若之後又遇到相同問題,已沒有
替死鬼可怪的話,民進黨還能把錯推給誰?
黃暐瀚今(19)日於《東網》專欄指出,如果蔡英文上任一年來丟了2個邦交國是馬英九
承認九二共識的錯,那在更之前的陳水扁、李登輝這2任總統一共丟了22個邦交國,難道
也都是馬親中所造成?
兩岸分治後,在黃暐瀚看來,大陸從未放棄打壓台灣的國際空間,而隨著雙方金錢和勢力
此消彼長,部分民眾主張的封鎖對岸根本行不通,因為大陸已經沒有什麼東西非靠我們不
可,以觀光產業來說,台灣每天都期盼陸客到來,但大陸就算沒有台灣遊客也不會倒。
「把錯都怪給馬英九,把錯都怪給友邦死愛錢,甚至把錯都怪給『萬惡的中共』,那是最
簡單,也最不花大腦的想法和做法了」。但黃暐瀚直言,現實很殘酷,台灣的國際地位跟
生存空間,並非自我催眠式地學義和團喊喊神功護體,就能將問題解決。
--
我肥得理直氣壯 我胖得比誰都爽
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.160.93.7
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1497840730.A.E97.html
噓
06/19 10:52, , 1F
06/19 10:52, 1F
噓
06/19 10:53, , 2F
06/19 10:53, 2F
噓
06/19 10:53, , 3F
06/19 10:53, 3F
噓
06/19 10:53, , 4F
06/19 10:53, 4F
→
06/19 10:53, , 5F
06/19 10:53, 5F
噓
06/19 10:53, , 6F
06/19 10:53, 6F
→
06/19 10:54, , 7F
06/19 10:54, 7F
→
06/19 10:54, , 8F
06/19 10:54, 8F
噓
06/19 10:54, , 9F
06/19 10:54, 9F
噓
06/19 10:54, , 10F
06/19 10:54, 10F
噓
06/19 10:54, , 11F
06/19 10:54, 11F
噓
06/19 10:55, , 12F
06/19 10:55, 12F
噓
06/19 10:55, , 13F
06/19 10:55, 13F
噓
06/19 10:58, , 14F
06/19 10:58, 14F
噓
06/19 10:58, , 15F
06/19 10:58, 15F
噓
06/19 10:58, , 16F
06/19 10:58, 16F
推
06/19 10:59, , 17F
06/19 10:59, 17F
推
06/19 11:00, , 18F
06/19 11:00, 18F
噓
06/19 11:00, , 19F
06/19 11:00, 19F
噓
06/19 11:01, , 20F
06/19 11:01, 20F
→
06/19 11:01, , 21F
06/19 11:01, 21F
噓
06/19 11:03, , 22F
06/19 11:03, 22F
噓
06/19 11:04, , 23F
06/19 11:04, 23F
→
06/19 11:07, , 24F
06/19 11:07, 24F
推
06/19 11:08, , 25F
06/19 11:08, 25F
推
06/19 11:08, , 26F
06/19 11:08, 26F
→
06/19 11:10, , 27F
06/19 11:10, 27F
推
06/19 11:12, , 28F
06/19 11:12, 28F
→
06/19 11:13, , 29F
06/19 11:13, 29F
噓
06/19 11:23, , 30F
06/19 11:23, 30F
噓
06/19 11:25, , 31F
06/19 11:25, 31F
噓
06/19 11:27, , 32F
06/19 11:27, 32F
推
06/19 11:32, , 33F
06/19 11:32, 33F
噓
06/19 11:33, , 34F
06/19 11:33, 34F
噓
06/19 11:34, , 35F
06/19 11:34, 35F
噓
06/19 11:37, , 36F
06/19 11:37, 36F
→
06/19 11:38, , 37F
06/19 11:38, 37F
噓
06/19 11:38, , 38F
06/19 11:38, 38F
→
06/19 11:39, , 39F
06/19 11:39, 39F
→
06/19 11:39, , 40F
06/19 11:39, 40F
→
06/19 11:41, , 41F
06/19 11:41, 41F
噓
06/19 11:42, , 42F
06/19 11:42, 42F
噓
06/19 11:43, , 43F
06/19 11:43, 43F
噓
06/19 11:47, , 44F
06/19 11:47, 44F
噓
06/19 11:49, , 45F
06/19 11:49, 45F
噓
06/19 11:50, , 46F
06/19 11:50, 46F
→
06/19 11:50, , 47F
06/19 11:50, 47F
推
06/19 11:51, , 48F
06/19 11:51, 48F
噓
06/19 11:57, , 49F
06/19 11:57, 49F
噓
06/19 11:59, , 50F
06/19 11:59, 50F
噓
06/19 12:00, , 51F
06/19 12:00, 51F
推
06/19 12:00, , 52F
06/19 12:00, 52F
→
06/19 12:01, , 53F
06/19 12:01, 53F
噓
06/19 12:10, , 54F
06/19 12:10, 54F
噓
06/19 12:14, , 55F
06/19 12:14, 55F
噓
06/19 12:19, , 56F
06/19 12:19, 56F
噓
06/19 12:27, , 57F
06/19 12:27, 57F
噓
06/19 12:32, , 58F
06/19 12:32, 58F
噓
06/19 12:34, , 59F
06/19 12:34, 59F
噓
06/19 12:42, , 60F
06/19 12:42, 60F
噓
06/19 12:47, , 61F
06/19 12:47, 61F
→
06/19 12:52, , 62F
06/19 12:52, 62F
→
06/19 12:58, , 63F
06/19 12:58, 63F
噓
06/19 12:58, , 64F
06/19 12:58, 64F
噓
06/19 13:02, , 65F
06/19 13:02, 65F
噓
06/19 13:02, , 66F
06/19 13:02, 66F
噓
06/19 13:05, , 67F
06/19 13:05, 67F
噓
06/19 13:11, , 68F
06/19 13:11, 68F
噓
06/19 13:18, , 69F
06/19 13:18, 69F
→
06/19 13:19, , 70F
06/19 13:19, 70F
噓
06/19 13:23, , 71F
06/19 13:23, 71F
→
06/19 14:11, , 72F
06/19 14:11, 72F
噓
06/19 14:17, , 73F
06/19 14:17, 73F
噓
06/19 15:13, , 74F
06/19 15:13, 74F
噓
06/19 16:29, , 75F
06/19 16:29, 75F
→
06/19 16:43, , 76F
06/19 16:43, 76F
→
06/19 19:31, , 77F
06/19 19:31, 77F
噓
06/19 23:47, , 78F
06/19 23:47, 78F
噓
06/20 21:43, , 79F
06/20 21:43, 79F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):